Examining gender and critical consciousness in the associations between White privilege attitudes and system-legitimizing ideologies in White college students.
{"title":"Examining gender and critical consciousness in the associations between White privilege attitudes and system-legitimizing ideologies in White college students.","authors":"Delida Sanchez, Sarah Arango, Whitney Adams, Isabella Stoto, Génesis Genao, Enrique Aguayo, Annemarie Dechellis","doi":"10.1037/cou0000799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. <i>T</i> tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. T tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.