The Role, Challenges, and Employment Characteristics of Disability Resource Professionals in Medical Education: A National Study.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Erin Broskowski, Sarah E Triano, Kara James, Rylee Betchkal, Karyn LaTurner Echols, Suzanne Hawks, Ochanya Ogah, Mytien Nguyen, Lisa M Meeks
{"title":"The Role, Challenges, and Employment Characteristics of Disability Resource Professionals in Medical Education: A National Study.","authors":"Erin Broskowski, Sarah E Triano, Kara James, Rylee Betchkal, Karyn LaTurner Echols, Suzanne Hawks, Ochanya Ogah, Mytien Nguyen, Lisa M Meeks","doi":"10.1177/23821205251344771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disability disclosure and accommodation requests among US medical students have increased significantly, yet gaps in support persist. Disability resource professionals (DRPs) are one essential support in bridging these gaps, but only 9% of medical schools employ a dedicated DRP, leaving institutions potentially underprepared to address the needs of students with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the roles, qualifications, and challenges of DRPs in US medical schools to identify barriers to job performance and inform strategies for strengthening and supporting this role in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory, cross-sectional survey was conducted in July to August 2023. A 27-question online survey was distributed through convenience and snowball strategy via social media and listservs. Questions addressed institutional structures, the size of DRP student caseloads, job satisfaction, mentorship, and barriers to managing caseloads. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ<sup>2</sup> tests, qualitative responses were thematically analyzed. The University of Michigan IRB approved this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine DRPs from 72 US MD and 7 DO programs participated. Most respondents reported excessive workloads, with 30% managing caseloads exceeding 100 students. Less than half of DRPs (45.6%) indicated that their workload was manageable. Inadequate professional development, lack of mentorship, and low salary satisfaction emerged as common challenges. Respondents also reported institutional barriers, including stigma, faculty resistance to accommodations, and the complexity of coordinating disability accommodations across didactic, clinical, and testing environments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>DRPs are critical to fostering accessible and inclusive medical education, yet systemic barriers undermine their effectiveness and place institutions at risk of increased student attrition, legal liability, and resource strain. Addressing these challenges requires investments in manageable caseloads, professional development for DRPs, faculty training, and institutional prioritization of the DRP role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systemic investments in staffing, training, and institutional culture are necessary to support DRPs and the growing population of US medical students with disabilities (MSWDs).</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251344771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251344771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disability disclosure and accommodation requests among US medical students have increased significantly, yet gaps in support persist. Disability resource professionals (DRPs) are one essential support in bridging these gaps, but only 9% of medical schools employ a dedicated DRP, leaving institutions potentially underprepared to address the needs of students with disabilities.

Objective: This study explored the roles, qualifications, and challenges of DRPs in US medical schools to identify barriers to job performance and inform strategies for strengthening and supporting this role in medical education.

Methods: An exploratory, cross-sectional survey was conducted in July to August 2023. A 27-question online survey was distributed through convenience and snowball strategy via social media and listservs. Questions addressed institutional structures, the size of DRP student caseloads, job satisfaction, mentorship, and barriers to managing caseloads. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 tests, qualitative responses were thematically analyzed. The University of Michigan IRB approved this study.

Results: Seventy-nine DRPs from 72 US MD and 7 DO programs participated. Most respondents reported excessive workloads, with 30% managing caseloads exceeding 100 students. Less than half of DRPs (45.6%) indicated that their workload was manageable. Inadequate professional development, lack of mentorship, and low salary satisfaction emerged as common challenges. Respondents also reported institutional barriers, including stigma, faculty resistance to accommodations, and the complexity of coordinating disability accommodations across didactic, clinical, and testing environments.

Discussion: DRPs are critical to fostering accessible and inclusive medical education, yet systemic barriers undermine their effectiveness and place institutions at risk of increased student attrition, legal liability, and resource strain. Addressing these challenges requires investments in manageable caseloads, professional development for DRPs, faculty training, and institutional prioritization of the DRP role.

Conclusions: Systemic investments in staffing, training, and institutional culture are necessary to support DRPs and the growing population of US medical students with disabilities (MSWDs).

残疾资源专业人员在医学教育中的角色、挑战和就业特征:一项全国性研究。
背景:美国医学生的残疾信息披露和住宿要求显著增加,但支持方面的差距仍然存在。残疾资源专业人员(DRPs)是弥合这些差距的重要支持,但只有9%的医学院聘请了专门的DRP,这使得机构在解决残疾学生的需求方面可能准备不足。目的:本研究探讨了美国医学院drp的角色、资格和挑战,以确定工作绩效的障碍,并为加强和支持该角色在医学教育中的作用提供策略。方法:于2023年7 - 8月进行探索性横断面调查。一份包含27个问题的在线调查通过便利和滚雪球策略通过社交媒体和listservs进行分发。问题涉及制度结构、DRP学生案例量的大小、工作满意度、指导和管理案例量的障碍。定量资料采用描述性统计和χ2检验进行分析,定性反应采用主题分析。密歇根大学伦理委员会批准了这项研究。结果:来自72个美国MD和7个DO项目的79名drp参与了研究。大多数受访者表示工作量过大,30%的受访者管理的案件数量超过100名学生。不到一半的drp(45.6%)表示他们的工作量是可控的。专业发展不足、缺乏指导和低工资满意度成为了共同的挑战。受访者还报告了制度障碍,包括耻辱,教师对住宿的抵制,以及在教学,临床和测试环境中协调残疾住宿的复杂性。讨论:drp对促进无障碍和包容性医学教育至关重要,但系统性障碍破坏了其有效性,并使机构面临学生流失增加、法律责任增加和资源紧张的风险。应对这些挑战需要在可管理的病例量、DRP的专业发展、教师培训和DRP角色的机构优先级方面进行投资。结论:在人员配置、培训和制度文化方面的系统性投资对于支持drp和不断增长的美国残疾医学生(MSWDs)是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信