Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool Nursing Version-Short Form.

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251346651
Faezeh Yousefi, Ali Asghar Parhizkari, Hamid Sharif-Nia, Saeed Ghasempour, Ali Abbasi
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool Nursing Version-Short Form.","authors":"Faezeh Yousefi, Ali Asghar Parhizkari, Hamid Sharif-Nia, Saeed Ghasempour, Ali Abbasi","doi":"10.1177/23779608251346651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caring is an integral part of the nursing profession, often viewed as an abstract and immeasurable behavior. However, caring behaviors can be measured and evaluated, ultimately improving care outcomes and practices. To accomplish this, a valid and reliable tool for measuring caring behaviors is essential. One such tool is the Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool Nursing Version-Short Form (CBAN-SF), which has not yet been translated and psychometrically evaluated in Iran.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the CBAN-SF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study was conducted at two hospitals affiliated with Shahroud University of Medical Sciences using a cross-sectional approach. The CBAN-SF was translated into Persian following the forward-backward procedure outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The validity (including face, content, and construct) and reliability (encompassing internal consistency and stability) of the Persian version of the CBAN-SF were assessed. In order to assess construct validity, 400 eligible clinical nurses were included in the study. The first 200 samples were used to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA), while the second 200 samples were used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was gauged through Cronbach's alpha coefficient, MacDonald's omega coefficient for internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficient for stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The assessment of content validity and EFA resulted in the removal of one item and six others, leaving a final set of 20 items. These were divided into four factors: \"dignified care,\" \"expression of feelings,\" \"self-sufficiency and self-belief,\" and \"patient-centered care,\" which together explained 56.82% of the total variance. The CFA demonstrated that the model closely matched the observed data. Furthermore, each subscale exhibited strong internal consistency and stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It can be concluded that the Persian version of the CBAN-SF shows adequate validity and reliability in evaluating the caring behavior of clinical nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251346651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251346651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Caring is an integral part of the nursing profession, often viewed as an abstract and immeasurable behavior. However, caring behaviors can be measured and evaluated, ultimately improving care outcomes and practices. To accomplish this, a valid and reliable tool for measuring caring behaviors is essential. One such tool is the Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool Nursing Version-Short Form (CBAN-SF), which has not yet been translated and psychometrically evaluated in Iran.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the CBAN-SF.

Methods: A methodological study was conducted at two hospitals affiliated with Shahroud University of Medical Sciences using a cross-sectional approach. The CBAN-SF was translated into Persian following the forward-backward procedure outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The validity (including face, content, and construct) and reliability (encompassing internal consistency and stability) of the Persian version of the CBAN-SF were assessed. In order to assess construct validity, 400 eligible clinical nurses were included in the study. The first 200 samples were used to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA), while the second 200 samples were used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was gauged through Cronbach's alpha coefficient, MacDonald's omega coefficient for internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficient for stability.

Results: The assessment of content validity and EFA resulted in the removal of one item and six others, leaving a final set of 20 items. These were divided into four factors: "dignified care," "expression of feelings," "self-sufficiency and self-belief," and "patient-centered care," which together explained 56.82% of the total variance. The CFA demonstrated that the model closely matched the observed data. Furthermore, each subscale exhibited strong internal consistency and stability.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the Persian version of the CBAN-SF shows adequate validity and reliability in evaluating the caring behavior of clinical nurses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

波斯语版护理行为评估工具的跨文化适应与心理测量学评价
护理是护理专业的一个组成部分,通常被视为一种抽象的、不可估量的行为。然而,护理行为是可以测量和评估的,最终会改善护理结果和实践。要做到这一点,一个有效和可靠的工具来衡量关怀行为是必不可少的。其中一个工具是护理行为评估工具简表(CBAN-SF),该工具在伊朗尚未翻译和心理测量学评估。目的:本研究旨在评价波斯语版本的CBAN-SF的心理测量特性。方法:采用横断面方法在沙赫鲁德医科大学附属的两家医院进行方法学研究。按照世界卫生组织(世卫组织)指导方针所规定的向前-向后程序,将《国别公报》翻译成波斯语。对波斯语版CBAN-SF的效度(包括面、内容和结构)和信度(包括内部一致性和稳定性)进行评估。为了评估结构效度,400名符合条件的临床护士被纳入研究。前200个样本进行探索性因子分析(EFA),后200个样本进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。信度通过Cronbach’s alpha系数、MacDonald’s omega系数和类内相关系数来衡量。结果:内容效度和EFA的评估导致删除了一个项目和其他六个项目,最终留下了20个项目。这些被分为四个因素:“有尊严的护理”、“情感的表达”、“自给自足和自信”和“以病人为中心的护理”,这些因素加在一起解释了56.82%的总方差。CFA表明,该模型与观测数据非常吻合。各子量表均表现出较强的内部一致性和稳定性。结论:波斯语版CBAN-SF量表在评价临床护士护理行为方面具有足够的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信