Exploring Interpersonal Guilt: Association with Emotion Dysregulation, Mentalization, Frustration Intolerance, and Body Appreciation.

Q4 Psychology
Jessica Leonardi, Federico Dazzi, Francesco Gazzillo
{"title":"Exploring Interpersonal Guilt: Association with Emotion Dysregulation, Mentalization, Frustration Intolerance, and Body Appreciation.","authors":"Jessica Leonardi, Federico Dazzi, Francesco Gazzillo","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.2.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study explored the relationship between different types of interpersonal guilt as conceived according to control-mastery theory and emotion dysregulation, mentalization, frustration intolerance, and body appreciation. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited 200 participants to whom we administered the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-20, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire-8, the Frustration Discomfort Scale, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and a sociodemographic schedule. <b>Results:</b> The data revealed that self-hate and burdening guilt were positively associated with emotion dysregulation and negatively associated with body appreciation. Frustration intolerance correlated with burdening guilt, while mentalization impairments were linked to self-hate. Both constructs also positively correlated with separation/disloyalty guilt. <b>Discussion:</b> The findings of this study underline the association between several guilt-related pathogenic beliefs and relevant psychopathological factors such as emotional dysregulation, mentalization difficulties, frustration intolerance, and body dissatisfaction. Among the pathogenic beliefs investigated, a particular role is played by the belief that one is bad, inadequate, and undeserving; the belief that one's own emotions, needs, and way of being is a burden to other people; and the beliefs that separating physically or psychologically from important others may hurt them. The clinical implications of these finds are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"53 2","pages":"235-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.2.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored the relationship between different types of interpersonal guilt as conceived according to control-mastery theory and emotion dysregulation, mentalization, frustration intolerance, and body appreciation. Methods: We recruited 200 participants to whom we administered the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-20, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire-8, the Frustration Discomfort Scale, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and a sociodemographic schedule. Results: The data revealed that self-hate and burdening guilt were positively associated with emotion dysregulation and negatively associated with body appreciation. Frustration intolerance correlated with burdening guilt, while mentalization impairments were linked to self-hate. Both constructs also positively correlated with separation/disloyalty guilt. Discussion: The findings of this study underline the association between several guilt-related pathogenic beliefs and relevant psychopathological factors such as emotional dysregulation, mentalization difficulties, frustration intolerance, and body dissatisfaction. Among the pathogenic beliefs investigated, a particular role is played by the belief that one is bad, inadequate, and undeserving; the belief that one's own emotions, needs, and way of being is a burden to other people; and the beliefs that separating physically or psychologically from important others may hurt them. The clinical implications of these finds are discussed.

探讨人际内疚感:与情绪失调、心理化、挫折不容忍和身体欣赏的关系。
摘要本研究探讨了控制-掌握理论中不同类型的人际内疚感与情绪失调、心理化、挫折不容忍和身体欣赏的关系。方法:我们招募了200名参与者,对他们进行了人际内疚评定量表-20、情绪调节困难量表-简表、反思功能问卷-8、挫折不适量表、身体欣赏量表-2和社会人口学量表。结果:自我憎恨和内疚负担与情绪失调呈正相关,与身体欣赏呈负相关。沮丧、不宽容与加重内疚感有关,而心智障碍与自我憎恨有关。这两个构念也与分离/不忠内疚感正相关。讨论:本研究的结果强调了几种与内疚相关的致病信念与相关的精神病理因素(如情绪失调、精神化困难、挫折不耐受和身体不满)之间的联系。在被调查的致病信念中,认为自己是坏的、不称职的、不值得的信念起着特殊的作用;自私自利:认为自己的情感、需要和生活方式是他人的负担的信念;并且认为在身体上或心理上与重要的人分开可能会伤害他们。讨论了这些发现的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信