Analytical Validation of an Automated Point-of-Care Immunoassay for the Measurement of Feline Pancreatic Lipase Immunoreactivity Concentration (Vcheck fPL 2.0)

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Lisa Wetzel, Joerg M. Steiner, Harry Cridge
{"title":"Analytical Validation of an Automated Point-of-Care Immunoassay for the Measurement of Feline Pancreatic Lipase Immunoreactivity Concentration (Vcheck fPL 2.0)","authors":"Lisa Wetzel,&nbsp;Joerg M. Steiner,&nbsp;Harry Cridge","doi":"10.1111/vcp.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pancreatic lipase assays are commonly utilized in the diagnostic approach to suspected pancreatitis in cats. The Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay is commercially available; however, analytical validation has yet to be reported in the peer-reviewed literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the analytic validity of a fluorescent immunoassay for the point-of-care quantification of feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Linearity was assessed via dilutional parallelism. Intra- and interassay variability was assessed by calculating coefficients of variation (%CV) across replicates on the same day and across multiple days, respectively. Bilirubin, hemoglobin, and intralipid (intralipid 30% IV emulsion, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) were utilized to evaluate the potential effects of interfering substances on the assay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Linearity was sub-optimal, with 12/15 diluted runs having an O/E ratio outside of the 80–120% target range. The mean %CV was 10.2% for intra-assay variability and 16.3% for interassay variability. Interfering substances had no significant effect on the results of the Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay (<i>P</i> = 0.888).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Vcheck fPL 2.0 appears to have poor linearity and suboptimal precision, limiting the accurate interpretation of results. Additional assay optimization should be considered prior to routine clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":23593,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary clinical pathology","volume":"54 2","pages":"154-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vcp.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vcp.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic lipase assays are commonly utilized in the diagnostic approach to suspected pancreatitis in cats. The Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay is commercially available; however, analytical validation has yet to be reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

Objective

To evaluate the analytic validity of a fluorescent immunoassay for the point-of-care quantification of feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay).

Methods

Linearity was assessed via dilutional parallelism. Intra- and interassay variability was assessed by calculating coefficients of variation (%CV) across replicates on the same day and across multiple days, respectively. Bilirubin, hemoglobin, and intralipid (intralipid 30% IV emulsion, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) were utilized to evaluate the potential effects of interfering substances on the assay.

Results

Linearity was sub-optimal, with 12/15 diluted runs having an O/E ratio outside of the 80–120% target range. The mean %CV was 10.2% for intra-assay variability and 16.3% for interassay variability. Interfering substances had no significant effect on the results of the Vcheck fPL 2.0 assay (P = 0.888).

Conclusions

The Vcheck fPL 2.0 appears to have poor linearity and suboptimal precision, limiting the accurate interpretation of results. Additional assay optimization should be considered prior to routine clinical use.

用于测量猫胰腺脂肪酶免疫反应性浓度(Vcheck fPL 2.0)的自动护理点免疫分析法的分析验证。
背景:胰脂肪酶测定通常用于猫疑似胰腺炎的诊断方法。Vcheck fPL 2.0检测已经上市;然而,分析验证尚未在同行评议的文献中报道。目的:评价荧光免疫分析法(Vcheck fPL 2.0法)用于猫胰腺脂肪酶免疫反应性即时定量的分析有效性。方法:稀释平行度法评价线性度。通过计算同一天和多日重复间的变异系数(%CV)来评估组内和组间变异。利用胆红素、血红蛋白和脂内(脂内30% IV乳剂,VWR, Radnor, PA, USA)来评估干扰物质对测定的潜在影响。结果:线性不是最优的,12/15稀释后的样品的O/E比在80-120%的目标范围之外。测定内变异性的平均变异系数为10.2%,测定间变异性的平均变异系数为16.3%。干扰物质对Vcheck fPL 2.0检测结果无显著影响(P = 0.888)。结论:Vcheck fPL 2.0线性度较差,精度不理想,限制了结果的准确解释。在常规临床使用之前,应考虑额外的分析优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary clinical pathology
Veterinary clinical pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
133
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Clinical Pathology is the official journal of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) and the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ESVCP). The journal''s mission is to provide an international forum for communication and discussion of scientific investigations and new developments that advance the art and science of laboratory diagnosis in animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology welcomes original experimental research and clinical contributions involving domestic, laboratory, avian, and wildlife species in the areas of hematology, hemostasis, immunopathology, clinical chemistry, cytopathology, surgical pathology, toxicology, endocrinology, laboratory and analytical techniques, instrumentation, quality assurance, and clinical pathology education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信