Ana Carolina Bercini Gusmao, Robin L van Dijk, Elsa B Girard, Katja T C A Peijnenburg, Jan Macher, Michal Kucera, Raphaël Morard
{"title":"Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera.","authors":"Ana Carolina Bercini Gusmao, Robin L van Dijk, Elsa B Girard, Katja T C A Peijnenburg, Jan Macher, Michal Kucera, Raphaël Morard","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-03842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabarcoding is a cornerstone of modern ecology, but its accuracy is dependent on the chosen gene marker. While the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) is a powerful tool to describe protist diversity, its reliability in retrieving the composition of communities is less obvious. It is particularly challenging to obtain quantitative estimates of abundance in planktonic foraminifera, where the variability of the SSU gene copy number can span three orders of magnitude. As an alternative, we explored the potential of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) marker. We developed a reference barcode library of 130 sequences of a 1200 bp long COI fragment belonging to 26 morphospecies of foraminifera and performed 201 single-cell qPCR quantifications to evaluate the relationship between the number of COI copies, and the size of individual foraminifera. We found that the COI evolves between 25 and 1000 times slower than the SSU and therefore has a poor taxonomic resolution. However, we observed a significant relationship between COI copy number and foraminifera size. These results suggest that SSU and COI can play complementary roles: the SSU is well-suited for capturing taxonomic diversity, while the COI is useful to retrieve crude information on the community composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"19205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03842-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metabarcoding is a cornerstone of modern ecology, but its accuracy is dependent on the chosen gene marker. While the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) is a powerful tool to describe protist diversity, its reliability in retrieving the composition of communities is less obvious. It is particularly challenging to obtain quantitative estimates of abundance in planktonic foraminifera, where the variability of the SSU gene copy number can span three orders of magnitude. As an alternative, we explored the potential of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) marker. We developed a reference barcode library of 130 sequences of a 1200 bp long COI fragment belonging to 26 morphospecies of foraminifera and performed 201 single-cell qPCR quantifications to evaluate the relationship between the number of COI copies, and the size of individual foraminifera. We found that the COI evolves between 25 and 1000 times slower than the SSU and therefore has a poor taxonomic resolution. However, we observed a significant relationship between COI copy number and foraminifera size. These results suggest that SSU and COI can play complementary roles: the SSU is well-suited for capturing taxonomic diversity, while the COI is useful to retrieve crude information on the community composition.
元条形码是现代生态学的基石,但其准确性取决于所选择的基因标记。虽然小亚单位核糖体DNA (SSU)是描述原生生物多样性的有力工具,但其在检索群落组成方面的可靠性不太明显。在浮游有孔虫中获得丰度的定量估计尤其具有挑战性,其中SSU基因拷贝数的可变性可以跨越三个数量级。作为一种替代方法,我们探索了线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I (COI)标记的潜力。我们建立了26个有孔虫形态种的1200 bp COI片段的130个序列的参考条形码文库,并进行了201次单细胞qPCR定量分析,以评估COI拷贝数与有孔虫个体大小之间的关系。我们发现COI的进化速度比SSU慢25到1000倍,因此分类分辨率很差。然而,我们观察到COI拷贝数与有孔虫大小有显著关系。这些结果表明,SSU和COI可以互补,SSU适合于捕获分类多样性,而COI可用于检索群落组成的原始信息。
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.