Child maltreatment and resilience in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Natalia E Fares-Otero, Julia Carranza-Neira, Jacqueline S Womersley, Aniko Stegemann, Inga Schalinski, Eduard Vieta, Georgina Spies, Soraya Seedat
{"title":"Child maltreatment and resilience in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Natalia E Fares-Otero, Julia Carranza-Neira, Jacqueline S Womersley, Aniko Stegemann, Inga Schalinski, Eduard Vieta, Georgina Spies, Soraya Seedat","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725001205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify associations between overall and subtypes of CM, global/trait resilience, and five resilience domains (coping, self-esteem, emotion regulation, self-efficacy, and well-being) in adults, and to examine moderators and mediators of these associations. A systematic search was undertaken on 12 June 2024 to identify published peer-reviewed articles in five databases (PROSPERO-CRD42023394120). Of 15,262 records, 203 studies were included, comprising 145,317 adults (M <i><sub>age</sub></i> = 29.62 years; 34.96% males); 183 studies and 557 effect sizes were pooled in random-effect meta-analyses. Overall CM and its subtypes were negatively associated with global/trait resilience and its domains (<i>r</i> = -0.081 to -0.330). Emotional abuse/neglect showed the largest magnitude of effect (<i>r</i> = -0.213 to -0.321). There was no meta-analytic evidence for an association between sexual abuse and coping, and physical abuse/neglect and self-esteem. Meta-regressions identified age, sample size, and study quality as moderators. Subgroup analyses found that associations between emotional abuse and emotion regulation were stronger, while associations between emotional abuse and self-esteem were weaker, in western <i>versus</i> non-western countries. No differences were found in associations between CM and resilience in clinical <i>versus</i> non-clinical samples. Narrative synthesis identified several mediators. Associations were of small magnitude and there were a limited number of studies, especially studies assessing CM subtypes, such as physical neglect, bullying, or domestic violence, and resilience domains, such as coping or self-efficacy, in males, and clinical samples. CM exposure negatively impacts resilience in adults, an effect observed across multiple maltreatment types and resilience domains. Interventions focused on resilience in adults with CM histories are needed to improve health and psychosocial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify associations between overall and subtypes of CM, global/trait resilience, and five resilience domains (coping, self-esteem, emotion regulation, self-efficacy, and well-being) in adults, and to examine moderators and mediators of these associations. A systematic search was undertaken on 12 June 2024 to identify published peer-reviewed articles in five databases (PROSPERO-CRD42023394120). Of 15,262 records, 203 studies were included, comprising 145,317 adults (M age = 29.62 years; 34.96% males); 183 studies and 557 effect sizes were pooled in random-effect meta-analyses. Overall CM and its subtypes were negatively associated with global/trait resilience and its domains (r = -0.081 to -0.330). Emotional abuse/neglect showed the largest magnitude of effect (r = -0.213 to -0.321). There was no meta-analytic evidence for an association between sexual abuse and coping, and physical abuse/neglect and self-esteem. Meta-regressions identified age, sample size, and study quality as moderators. Subgroup analyses found that associations between emotional abuse and emotion regulation were stronger, while associations between emotional abuse and self-esteem were weaker, in western versus non-western countries. No differences were found in associations between CM and resilience in clinical versus non-clinical samples. Narrative synthesis identified several mediators. Associations were of small magnitude and there were a limited number of studies, especially studies assessing CM subtypes, such as physical neglect, bullying, or domestic violence, and resilience domains, such as coping or self-efficacy, in males, and clinical samples. CM exposure negatively impacts resilience in adults, an effect observed across multiple maltreatment types and resilience domains. Interventions focused on resilience in adults with CM histories are needed to improve health and psychosocial outcomes.

儿童虐待与成年后的适应能力:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化成人CM的总体和亚型、整体/特质弹性和五个弹性领域(应对、自尊、情绪调节、自我效能和幸福感)之间的关联,并研究这些关联的调节因子和中介因子。于2024年6月12日进行了系统检索,以确定五个数据库(PROSPERO-CRD42023394120)中已发表的同行评议文章。在15,262份记录中,包括203项研究,包括145,317名成年人(M年龄= 29.62岁;34.96%的男性);183项研究和557个效应量被纳入随机效应荟萃分析。总体CM及其亚型与整体/性状弹性及其域呈负相关(r = -0.081 ~ -0.330)。情绪虐待/忽视的影响幅度最大(r = -0.213 ~ -0.321)。没有元分析证据表明性虐待与应对、身体虐待/忽视与自尊之间存在关联。meta回归发现年龄、样本量和研究质量是调节因素。亚组分析发现,在西方国家和非西方国家,情绪虐待和情绪调节之间的联系更强,而情绪虐待和自尊之间的联系较弱。在临床和非临床样本中,CM和恢复力之间没有差异。叙事综合确定了几个中介。相关性较小,研究数量有限,特别是评估CM亚型(如身体忽视、欺凌或家庭暴力)和弹性领域(如应对或自我效能)的研究,在男性和临床样本中。在多种虐待类型和恢复力领域中观察到,CM暴露对成人的恢复力有负面影响。需要采取干预措施,重点关注有CM病史的成年人的恢复力,以改善健康和社会心理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信