Preliminary development and validation of the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1037/pas0001388
Kelsie T Forbush, Yiyang Chen, Sean Joo, Danielle A N Chapa, Kelsey E Hagan, Brianne N Richson, Sarah Johnson-Munguia, Kara A Christensen Pacella, Angeline R Bottera, Marianna L Thomeczek, Brittany K Bohrer, Victoria Perko, Sonakshi Negi, Anjali R Sharma, Emily E Like, Robert W Morgan, Irina A Vanzhula, Jenna Tregarthen, Jorge Palacios, Sara R Gould
{"title":"Preliminary development and validation of the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker.","authors":"Kelsie T Forbush, Yiyang Chen, Sean Joo, Danielle A N Chapa, Kelsey E Hagan, Brianne N Richson, Sarah Johnson-Munguia, Kara A Christensen Pacella, Angeline R Bottera, Marianna L Thomeczek, Brittany K Bohrer, Victoria Perko, Sonakshi Negi, Anjali R Sharma, Emily E Like, Robert W Morgan, Irina A Vanzhula, Jenna Tregarthen, Jorge Palacios, Sara R Gould","doi":"10.1037/pas0001388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few routine outcomes monitoring (ROM) tools available to track changes in eating-disorder (ED) symptom expression. Given that ROM is critical for providing measurement-based care, there is a pressing need to develop ROM tools for EDs. The present study developed and validated the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker (EPCOT). Study 1 included administering the initial EPCOT item pool to college students (<i>N</i> = 380). In Study 2 (Recovery Record), a revised EPCOT item pool was administered to adolescents and adults with an ED (<i>N</i> = 2,196). Participants were retested at 1- to 2-week (<i>n</i> = 964) and 1-month (<i>n</i> = 473) follow-up. Finally, Study 3 (Mechanical Turk sample) was a longitudinal study of community adults who were tested at baseline (<i>N</i> = 305), 1-week (<i>n</i> = 240), and 6-month (<i>n</i> = 172) follow-up. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory analysis and item response theory to identify differential item functioning across weight categories and ED diagnostic groups. The final version of the EPCOT had 24 items and eight scales. The EPCOT showed evidence for moderate-to-good test-retest reliability and good-to-excellent internal consistency, discriminant and convergent validity, and criterion-related validity. Finally, in Study 3, several EPCOT scales demonstrated predictive validity for predicting general and ED-specific psychiatric impairment at 6-month follow-up. The EPCOT showed initial promise as a tool that can be used to help clinicians track progress in therapy over time and may have utility in research contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"331-346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few routine outcomes monitoring (ROM) tools available to track changes in eating-disorder (ED) symptom expression. Given that ROM is critical for providing measurement-based care, there is a pressing need to develop ROM tools for EDs. The present study developed and validated the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker (EPCOT). Study 1 included administering the initial EPCOT item pool to college students (N = 380). In Study 2 (Recovery Record), a revised EPCOT item pool was administered to adolescents and adults with an ED (N = 2,196). Participants were retested at 1- to 2-week (n = 964) and 1-month (n = 473) follow-up. Finally, Study 3 (Mechanical Turk sample) was a longitudinal study of community adults who were tested at baseline (N = 305), 1-week (n = 240), and 6-month (n = 172) follow-up. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory analysis and item response theory to identify differential item functioning across weight categories and ED diagnostic groups. The final version of the EPCOT had 24 items and eight scales. The EPCOT showed evidence for moderate-to-good test-retest reliability and good-to-excellent internal consistency, discriminant and convergent validity, and criterion-related validity. Finally, in Study 3, several EPCOT scales demonstrated predictive validity for predicting general and ED-specific psychiatric impairment at 6-month follow-up. The EPCOT showed initial promise as a tool that can be used to help clinicians track progress in therapy over time and may have utility in research contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

进食病理临床结果追踪器的初步开发和验证。
很少有常规结局监测(ROM)工具可用于跟踪饮食障碍(ED)症状表达的变化。鉴于ROM对于提供基于测量的护理至关重要,因此迫切需要为急诊开发ROM工具。本研究开发并验证了进食病理临床结果追踪器(EPCOT)。研究1包括对大学生进行初始EPCOT项目池管理(N = 380)。在研究2(恢复记录)中,对患有ED的青少年和成人(N = 2196)实施了修订后的EPCOT项目池。参与者在随访1- 2周(n = 964)和1个月(n = 473)时再次接受测试。最后,研究3 (Mechanical Turk样本)是一项对社区成年人的纵向研究,他们在基线(N = 305)、1周(N = 240)和6个月(N = 172)的随访中进行了测试。分析包括探索性和验证性分析和项目反应理论,以确定不同体重类别和ED诊断组的不同项目功能。最终版本的EPCOT有24个项目和8个量表。EPCOT具有中等至良好的重测信度、良好至优异的内部一致性、判别效度和收敛效度以及标准相关效度。最后,在研究3中,几个EPCOT量表在6个月的随访中显示了预测一般和ed特异性精神障碍的预测有效性。EPCOT最初有望作为一种工具,用于帮助临床医生跟踪治疗进展,并可能在研究背景下发挥作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信