Kelsie T Forbush, Yiyang Chen, Sean Joo, Danielle A N Chapa, Kelsey E Hagan, Brianne N Richson, Sarah Johnson-Munguia, Kara A Christensen Pacella, Angeline R Bottera, Marianna L Thomeczek, Brittany K Bohrer, Victoria Perko, Sonakshi Negi, Anjali R Sharma, Emily E Like, Robert W Morgan, Irina A Vanzhula, Jenna Tregarthen, Jorge Palacios, Sara R Gould
{"title":"Preliminary development and validation of the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker.","authors":"Kelsie T Forbush, Yiyang Chen, Sean Joo, Danielle A N Chapa, Kelsey E Hagan, Brianne N Richson, Sarah Johnson-Munguia, Kara A Christensen Pacella, Angeline R Bottera, Marianna L Thomeczek, Brittany K Bohrer, Victoria Perko, Sonakshi Negi, Anjali R Sharma, Emily E Like, Robert W Morgan, Irina A Vanzhula, Jenna Tregarthen, Jorge Palacios, Sara R Gould","doi":"10.1037/pas0001388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few routine outcomes monitoring (ROM) tools available to track changes in eating-disorder (ED) symptom expression. Given that ROM is critical for providing measurement-based care, there is a pressing need to develop ROM tools for EDs. The present study developed and validated the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker (EPCOT). Study 1 included administering the initial EPCOT item pool to college students (<i>N</i> = 380). In Study 2 (Recovery Record), a revised EPCOT item pool was administered to adolescents and adults with an ED (<i>N</i> = 2,196). Participants were retested at 1- to 2-week (<i>n</i> = 964) and 1-month (<i>n</i> = 473) follow-up. Finally, Study 3 (Mechanical Turk sample) was a longitudinal study of community adults who were tested at baseline (<i>N</i> = 305), 1-week (<i>n</i> = 240), and 6-month (<i>n</i> = 172) follow-up. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory analysis and item response theory to identify differential item functioning across weight categories and ED diagnostic groups. The final version of the EPCOT had 24 items and eight scales. The EPCOT showed evidence for moderate-to-good test-retest reliability and good-to-excellent internal consistency, discriminant and convergent validity, and criterion-related validity. Finally, in Study 3, several EPCOT scales demonstrated predictive validity for predicting general and ED-specific psychiatric impairment at 6-month follow-up. The EPCOT showed initial promise as a tool that can be used to help clinicians track progress in therapy over time and may have utility in research contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"331-346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are few routine outcomes monitoring (ROM) tools available to track changes in eating-disorder (ED) symptom expression. Given that ROM is critical for providing measurement-based care, there is a pressing need to develop ROM tools for EDs. The present study developed and validated the Eating Pathology Clinical Outcomes Tracker (EPCOT). Study 1 included administering the initial EPCOT item pool to college students (N = 380). In Study 2 (Recovery Record), a revised EPCOT item pool was administered to adolescents and adults with an ED (N = 2,196). Participants were retested at 1- to 2-week (n = 964) and 1-month (n = 473) follow-up. Finally, Study 3 (Mechanical Turk sample) was a longitudinal study of community adults who were tested at baseline (N = 305), 1-week (n = 240), and 6-month (n = 172) follow-up. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory analysis and item response theory to identify differential item functioning across weight categories and ED diagnostic groups. The final version of the EPCOT had 24 items and eight scales. The EPCOT showed evidence for moderate-to-good test-retest reliability and good-to-excellent internal consistency, discriminant and convergent validity, and criterion-related validity. Finally, in Study 3, several EPCOT scales demonstrated predictive validity for predicting general and ED-specific psychiatric impairment at 6-month follow-up. The EPCOT showed initial promise as a tool that can be used to help clinicians track progress in therapy over time and may have utility in research contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews