Safety Profile of Lithium: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Hao Zhu, Jack Guo, Hannah Lui, Patrick Ip
{"title":"Safety Profile of Lithium: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Hao Zhu, Jack Guo, Hannah Lui, Patrick Ip","doi":"10.1159/000546602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Although lithium has long been considered the gold standard for mood stabilization in the treatment of bipolar disorder, growing concerns about its adverse events have significantly undermined its once-trusted status. This study aims to conduct a pharmacovigilance analysis of lithium to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its safety profile. Methods Four disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were employed to detect potential signals between lithium and various adverse events. Results Analysis of 6,909 adverse event reports (AERs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) showed that lithium-related adverse events occur in the endocrine, renal or urinary, nervous, and psychiatric systems. Well-known adverse events, such as hypothyroidism, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and ataxia, were found. In addition, several previously overlooked adverse events, such as renal oncocytoma, benign parathyroid tumour, and Adams-Stokes syndrome, were identified. Conclusion By analyzing real-world data, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of lithium's safety profile, offering critical evidence for its clinical risk. However, given the inherent limitations of FAERS, such as underreporting of minor symptoms, the findings should be interpreted cautiously.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Although lithium has long been considered the gold standard for mood stabilization in the treatment of bipolar disorder, growing concerns about its adverse events have significantly undermined its once-trusted status. This study aims to conduct a pharmacovigilance analysis of lithium to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its safety profile. Methods Four disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were employed to detect potential signals between lithium and various adverse events. Results Analysis of 6,909 adverse event reports (AERs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) showed that lithium-related adverse events occur in the endocrine, renal or urinary, nervous, and psychiatric systems. Well-known adverse events, such as hypothyroidism, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and ataxia, were found. In addition, several previously overlooked adverse events, such as renal oncocytoma, benign parathyroid tumour, and Adams-Stokes syndrome, were identified. Conclusion By analyzing real-world data, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of lithium's safety profile, offering critical evidence for its clinical risk. However, given the inherent limitations of FAERS, such as underreporting of minor symptoms, the findings should be interpreted cautiously.

锂的安全性:使用FDA不良事件报告系统的歧化分析。
虽然锂一直被认为是治疗双相情感障碍中稳定情绪的黄金标准,但对其不良事件的日益关注已经大大破坏了它曾经被信任的地位。本研究旨在对锂进行药物警戒性分析,以提供对其安全性更全面的了解。方法采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM) 4种歧化分析方法,检测锂与各种不良事件之间的潜在信号。结果对来自FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的6909份不良事件报告(AERs)的分析显示,锂相关不良事件发生在内分泌、肾脏或泌尿系统、神经系统和精神系统。众所周知的不良事件,如甲状腺功能减退,肾源性尿崩症和共济失调,被发现。此外,还发现了一些以前被忽视的不良事件,如肾嗜瘤细胞瘤、良性甲状旁腺瘤和Adams-Stokes综合征。结论通过分析真实数据,本研究对锂的安全性进行了全面评估,为其临床风险提供了关键证据。然而,考虑到FAERS固有的局限性,如轻微症状的漏报,研究结果应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信