Implications of lumbosacral transitional anatomy on vertebral numbering: evaluation of 3147 adult full-length spine radiographs.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shahbaaz A Sabri, Renzo A Laynes, Clayton J Hoffman, Joseph C Chavarria, Parker J Prusick, Rachael E Weesner, Nathanial Stringer, James P Farrell, David Gimarc, Mary K Lowry, Vikas Patel, David Ou-Yang, Evalina Burger-Van Der Walt, Christopher J Kleck
{"title":"Implications of lumbosacral transitional anatomy on vertebral numbering: evaluation of 3147 adult full-length spine radiographs.","authors":"Shahbaaz A Sabri, Renzo A Laynes, Clayton J Hoffman, Joseph C Chavarria, Parker J Prusick, Rachael E Weesner, Nathanial Stringer, James P Farrell, David Gimarc, Mary K Lowry, Vikas Patel, David Ou-Yang, Evalina Burger-Van Der Walt, Christopher J Kleck","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.FOCUS2555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When evaluating anomalous vertebral anatomy, limited consensus exists on how to best label vertebrae, leading to numbering discrepancies between radiologists and surgeons. Errors in vertebral numbering can have devastating implications for patients, especially when intraoperative numbering errors occur. Analyzing whole-spine radiographs and identifying patterns of transitional anatomy relative to vertebral numbering could allow for a consistent numbering method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution cross-sectional study included patients older than 18 years of age who underwent full-length spine imaging at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 31, 2018, to March 31, 2020. Patients with deformity or congenital fusion were included. A retrospective analysis was performed on full-length spine radiographs obtained in 3147 patients. The number of presacral mobile segments, number of ribs, and presence of hypoplastic or incomplete ribs were identified and recorded. Results were reviewed by a committee of musculoskeletal radiologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic spine surgeons, with verification through interobserver analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3147 patients (age range 18-89 years), 2868 (91.1%) had the conventional 24 presacral mobile segments (7 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar). Transitional anatomy, defined as having fewer or more than 24 presacral segments, was observed in 279 patients (8.8%). Specifically, 174 patients (5.5%) had 25 presacral segments, 104 patients (3.3%) had 23, and 1 patient (0.03%) had 26. Regarding the number of ribbed vertebrae (thoracic), 2976 patients (94.6%) had 12 ribs, including hypoplastic ribs, while 143 (4.5%) had 11 ribs, and 28 (0.88%) had 13 ribs. The co-occurrence of both lumbosacral transitional anatomy and an abnormal number of ribbed vertebrae (thoracic) was least prevalent and observed in 56 patients (1.8%). Considering the first nonribbed vertebra as the first lumbar vertebra aligned with the most prevalent pattern of transitional anatomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of 3147 patients with full-length spine imaging demonstrated a lower prevalence of ribbed vertebral body anatomical variations compared with transitional lumbosacral anatomy. Based on these findings, the authors suggest further investigation of numbering vertebrae in a cranial to caudal progression, designating the first ribbed vertebra as thoracic (T1) and the first nonribbed vertebra in the lumbar spine as lumbar (L1). The clinical impact of a standardized vertebral numbering system is yet to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 6","pages":"E13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.FOCUS2555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: When evaluating anomalous vertebral anatomy, limited consensus exists on how to best label vertebrae, leading to numbering discrepancies between radiologists and surgeons. Errors in vertebral numbering can have devastating implications for patients, especially when intraoperative numbering errors occur. Analyzing whole-spine radiographs and identifying patterns of transitional anatomy relative to vertebral numbering could allow for a consistent numbering method.

Methods: This single-institution cross-sectional study included patients older than 18 years of age who underwent full-length spine imaging at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 31, 2018, to March 31, 2020. Patients with deformity or congenital fusion were included. A retrospective analysis was performed on full-length spine radiographs obtained in 3147 patients. The number of presacral mobile segments, number of ribs, and presence of hypoplastic or incomplete ribs were identified and recorded. Results were reviewed by a committee of musculoskeletal radiologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic spine surgeons, with verification through interobserver analysis.

Results: Among 3147 patients (age range 18-89 years), 2868 (91.1%) had the conventional 24 presacral mobile segments (7 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar). Transitional anatomy, defined as having fewer or more than 24 presacral segments, was observed in 279 patients (8.8%). Specifically, 174 patients (5.5%) had 25 presacral segments, 104 patients (3.3%) had 23, and 1 patient (0.03%) had 26. Regarding the number of ribbed vertebrae (thoracic), 2976 patients (94.6%) had 12 ribs, including hypoplastic ribs, while 143 (4.5%) had 11 ribs, and 28 (0.88%) had 13 ribs. The co-occurrence of both lumbosacral transitional anatomy and an abnormal number of ribbed vertebrae (thoracic) was least prevalent and observed in 56 patients (1.8%). Considering the first nonribbed vertebra as the first lumbar vertebra aligned with the most prevalent pattern of transitional anatomy.

Conclusions: Evaluation of 3147 patients with full-length spine imaging demonstrated a lower prevalence of ribbed vertebral body anatomical variations compared with transitional lumbosacral anatomy. Based on these findings, the authors suggest further investigation of numbering vertebrae in a cranial to caudal progression, designating the first ribbed vertebra as thoracic (T1) and the first nonribbed vertebra in the lumbar spine as lumbar (L1). The clinical impact of a standardized vertebral numbering system is yet to be determined.

腰骶过渡解剖对椎体编号的影响:3147张成人全长脊柱x线片的评价。
目的:在评估异常椎体解剖时,关于如何最好地标记椎体存在有限的共识,导致放射科医生和外科医生之间的编号差异。椎体编号错误可能对患者造成毁灭性的影响,特别是当术中发生编号错误时。分析全脊柱x线片和识别相对于椎体编号的过渡解剖模式可以允许一致的编号方法。方法:这项单机构横断面研究纳入了2018年1月31日至2020年3月31日在科罗拉多大学医院接受全身脊柱成像的18岁以上患者。包括畸形或先天性融合的患者。回顾性分析了3147例患者的全长脊柱x线片。确定并记录骶前活动节段的数量、肋骨的数量以及发育不良或不完整肋骨的存在。结果由肌肉骨骼放射科医生、神经外科医生和骨科脊柱外科医生组成的委员会进行审查,并通过观察者间分析进行验证。结果:3147例患者(年龄18-89岁)中,2868例(91.1%)有常规的24个骶前活动节段(7个颈椎节段,12个胸椎节段,5个腰椎节段)。279例(8.8%)患者观察到过渡性解剖,定义为骶前节段少于或多于24节。其中,174例(5.5%)患者有25个骶前节段,104例(3.3%)患者有23个,1例(0.03%)患者有26个。在肋椎骨(胸椎)数量上,包括发育不全在内的12根肋骨2976例(94.6%),11根肋骨143例(4.5%),13根肋骨28例(0.88%)。腰骶过渡解剖和肋椎骨(胸椎)数量异常同时出现的情况最少,在56例患者中观察到(1.8%)。考虑到第一节无肋椎体作为第一节腰椎符合最普遍的过渡解剖模式。结论:对3147例患者的全身脊柱成像评估表明,与过渡性腰骶解剖相比,肋椎体解剖变异的发生率较低。基于这些发现,作者建议进一步研究颅椎到尾椎椎体的编号,将第一个肋椎体命名为胸椎(T1),将腰椎第一个非肋椎体命名为腰椎(L1)。标准化椎体编号系统的临床影响还有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信