A Highly Sensitive Multiplex Antibody Assay Reduces Window Period for Detection of Babesia microti Infection.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-31 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf253
Scott Meredith, Ankit Puri, Victoria F Majam, Hong Zheng, Miranda S Oakley, Laura Tonnetti, Susan L Stramer, Sanjai Kumar
{"title":"A Highly Sensitive Multiplex Antibody Assay Reduces Window Period for Detection of <i>Babesia microti</i> Infection.","authors":"Scott Meredith, Ankit Puri, Victoria F Majam, Hong Zheng, Miranda S Oakley, Laura Tonnetti, Susan L Stramer, Sanjai Kumar","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The health burden of <i>Babesia microti</i>, the primary causative agent of human babesiosis in the United States, is significant and increasing. Diagnosis of clinical babesiosis still remains challenging, resulting in misdiagnosis and underreporting. The gold standard for detection of <i>B. microti</i>-specific antibody, immunofluorescence assay (IFA), is cumbersome and resource-intensive. A high-throughput assay to detect serological biomarkers of <i>B. microti</i> exposure would facilitate epidemiological studies and clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a multiantigen, high-throughput, and highly sensitive Luminex bead-based assay (LBA) for detection of <i>Babesia microti</i>--specific antibodies in babesiosis patients and endemic populations. Serum samples from 191 individuals who had confirmed <i>B. microti</i> exposure (IFA or polymerase chain reaction [PCR] positive) were screened for antibody reactivity to 4 immunodominant antigens-MCFRP1, BAHCS1, SERA1, and PiβS1-by LBA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4 antigens evaluated, MCFRP1 and BAHCS1 were the most sensitive biomarkers for <i>B. microti</i> exposure, detecting 96.6% and 100% of IFA+/PCR+ and 75.3% and 87.6% of IFA+/PCR- samples, respectively. The \"window period\" before IFA-detectable seroconversion is of particular concern for clinical diagnosis using serological detection methods. Importantly, combining all 4 antigens allowed detection of 6/13 (46.2%) PCR-positive cases that were missed by IFA. No single antigen yielded reactivity to more than 3/13 (23.1%) IFA-/PCR+ cases in our LBA, indicating diversity in the polarization of early immune responses following <i>B. microti</i> exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination of these antigens in our LBA would reduce the window period before IFA-detectable seroconversion of detection in <i>Babesia microti</i>-exposed individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 6","pages":"ofaf253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health burden of Babesia microti, the primary causative agent of human babesiosis in the United States, is significant and increasing. Diagnosis of clinical babesiosis still remains challenging, resulting in misdiagnosis and underreporting. The gold standard for detection of B. microti-specific antibody, immunofluorescence assay (IFA), is cumbersome and resource-intensive. A high-throughput assay to detect serological biomarkers of B. microti exposure would facilitate epidemiological studies and clinical diagnosis.

Methods: We developed a multiantigen, high-throughput, and highly sensitive Luminex bead-based assay (LBA) for detection of Babesia microti--specific antibodies in babesiosis patients and endemic populations. Serum samples from 191 individuals who had confirmed B. microti exposure (IFA or polymerase chain reaction [PCR] positive) were screened for antibody reactivity to 4 immunodominant antigens-MCFRP1, BAHCS1, SERA1, and PiβS1-by LBA.

Results: Among the 4 antigens evaluated, MCFRP1 and BAHCS1 were the most sensitive biomarkers for B. microti exposure, detecting 96.6% and 100% of IFA+/PCR+ and 75.3% and 87.6% of IFA+/PCR- samples, respectively. The "window period" before IFA-detectable seroconversion is of particular concern for clinical diagnosis using serological detection methods. Importantly, combining all 4 antigens allowed detection of 6/13 (46.2%) PCR-positive cases that were missed by IFA. No single antigen yielded reactivity to more than 3/13 (23.1%) IFA-/PCR+ cases in our LBA, indicating diversity in the polarization of early immune responses following B. microti exposure.

Conclusions: Combination of these antigens in our LBA would reduce the window period before IFA-detectable seroconversion of detection in Babesia microti-exposed individuals.

一种高灵敏度的多重抗体试验减少了检测巴贝斯虫感染的窗口期。
背景:在美国,微巴贝斯虫是人类巴贝斯虫病的主要病原体,其健康负担显著且不断增加。临床巴贝斯虫病的诊断仍然具有挑战性,导致误诊和漏报。检测微螺旋体特异性抗体的金标准,免疫荧光法(IFA),是繁琐和资源密集的。采用高通量检测方法检测微孢子虫暴露的血清学生物标志物,将有助于流行病学研究和临床诊断。方法:我们开发了一种多抗原、高通量、高灵敏度的Luminex微珠检测方法(LBA),用于检测巴贝斯虫病患者和流行人群的微小巴贝斯虫特异性抗体。通过LBA筛选191例确诊微螺旋体暴露(IFA或聚合酶链反应[PCR]阳性)的血清样本,检测其对4种免疫优势抗原mcfrp1、BAHCS1、SERA1和pi β s1的抗体反应性。结果:在所评估的4种抗原中,MCFRP1和BAHCS1是微孢子虫暴露最敏感的生物标志物,分别对IFA+/PCR+的检出率为96.6%和100%,对IFA+/PCR-的检出率为75.3%和87.6%。在使用血清学检测方法进行临床诊断时,ifa可检测血清转化前的“窗口期”尤其值得关注。重要的是,结合所有4种抗原可以检测出6/13(46.2%)的pcr阳性病例。在我们的LBA中,没有任何一种抗原对3/13(23.1%)以上的IFA-/PCR+病例产生反应性,这表明微螺旋体暴露后早期免疫反应的极化存在多样性。结论:在我们的LBA中联合使用这些抗原可以缩短暴露于巴贝斯虫个体的ifa检测血清转化的窗口期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信