Associations Between Cognitive Function on Return to Work, Readiness to Return to Work and Work Continuation After Return to Work: A Longitudinal Study of Workers With Major Depressive Disorder.

Q3 Medicine
Ryutaro Furusawa, Kosuke Mafune, Ayako Hino, Akiomi Inoue, Hisashi Eguchi
{"title":"Associations Between Cognitive Function on Return to Work, Readiness to Return to Work and Work Continuation After Return to Work: A Longitudinal Study of Workers With Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Ryutaro Furusawa, Kosuke Mafune, Ayako Hino, Akiomi Inoue, Hisashi Eguchi","doi":"10.7888/juoeh.47.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the association between readiness to return to work, cognitive function, and work continuation after returning to work in workers with major depressive disorder. We assessed whether cognitive assessments in THINC-it could be used as intermediate variables to explain the association between The Psychiatric rework readiness scale (PRRS) total score and work continuation one year after returning to work in workers with major depressive disorder. Twenty-four individuals participated. The psychiatric rework readiness scale total score was significantly associated with work continuation one year after return to work (β = 0.197, 95% CI [0.002, 0.391]). PRRS total score and the five-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D5) were also significantly associated (β = 0.072, 95% CI [0.014, 0.130]). However, the indirect effects were not significant for PDQ-D5, Spotter, Symbol Check, Codebreaker, or Trails. Better readiness for return to work in workers with major depressive disorder was associated with a better assessment of the PDQ-D5. Five cognitive assessments as mediating variables did not explain the association between the evaluation of readiness for return to work and work continuation one year later.</p>","PeriodicalId":17570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of UOEH","volume":"47 2","pages":"55-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of UOEH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7888/juoeh.47.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the association between readiness to return to work, cognitive function, and work continuation after returning to work in workers with major depressive disorder. We assessed whether cognitive assessments in THINC-it could be used as intermediate variables to explain the association between The Psychiatric rework readiness scale (PRRS) total score and work continuation one year after returning to work in workers with major depressive disorder. Twenty-four individuals participated. The psychiatric rework readiness scale total score was significantly associated with work continuation one year after return to work (β = 0.197, 95% CI [0.002, 0.391]). PRRS total score and the five-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D5) were also significantly associated (β = 0.072, 95% CI [0.014, 0.130]). However, the indirect effects were not significant for PDQ-D5, Spotter, Symbol Check, Codebreaker, or Trails. Better readiness for return to work in workers with major depressive disorder was associated with a better assessment of the PDQ-D5. Five cognitive assessments as mediating variables did not explain the association between the evaluation of readiness for return to work and work continuation one year later.

重返工作岗位的认知功能、重返工作岗位的准备程度和重返工作岗位后继续工作的关系:一项对重度抑郁症患者的纵向研究。
本研究旨在阐明重性抑郁症患者重返工作岗位的准备程度、认知功能和重返工作岗位后继续工作之间的关系。我们评估了认知评估是否可以作为中间变量来解释精神病学返工准备量表(PRRS)总分与重性抑郁症患者重返工作一年后继续工作之间的关系。共有24人参加。精神病学返工准备量表总分与复工后1年的工作继续程度显著相关(β = 0.197, 95% CI[0.002, 0.391])。PRRS总分与五项知觉缺陷问卷-抑郁(PDQ-D5)也显著相关(β = 0.072, 95% CI[0.014, 0.130])。然而,PDQ-D5、Spotter、Symbol Check、Codebreaker或Trails的间接影响不显著。重度抑郁症患者重返工作岗位的准备程度越高,PDQ-D5的评估水平越高。五项认知评估作为中介变量并不能解释一年后重返工作的准备评估与工作继续之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of UOEH
Journal of UOEH Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Published quarterly: 1 annual volume consisted of 4 numbers. Issued on the 1st of March, June, September and December, respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信