Patient Satisfaction in Ophthalmology: The Impact of Remote Scribes.

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ryung Lee, Jeanette Du, Eric L Wan, Geena Kim, Mohsin H Ali, Michael M Lai
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction in Ophthalmology: The Impact of Remote Scribes.","authors":"Ryung Lee, Jeanette Du, Eric L Wan, Geena Kim, Mohsin H Ali, Michael M Lai","doi":"10.1177/24741264251340104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To determine whether remote scribing is associated with patient satisfaction. <b>Methods:</b> Physicians were included based on predetermined criteria. For all physicians, Net Promoter Score response data were collected for 3 consecutive months immediately before and 6 months after the transition to remote scribes. Over 2 years, 272 885 responses were analyzed. Patient time spent in the office was also assessed. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-three physicians transitioned to remote scribes between March 2022 and September 2023. For participating physicians, the mean Net Promoter Score rating improved from 9.34 to 9.44 (<i>P</i> = .008) for \"likelihood of recommending physician\" and from 9.54 to 9.60 (<i>P</i> < .001) for \"likelihood of recommending practice.\" After the transition, the mean time spent in the \"primary waiting room\" decreased from 14.88 minutes to 13.41 minutes (<i>P</i> < .001) and the mean time spent in the \"exam room\" decreased from 22.89 minutes to 21.22 minutes (<i>P</i> < .001). All secondary outcomes improved after the transition. <b>Conclusions:</b> After implementing remote scribes and based on Net Promoter Score ratings, patient satisfaction scores improved and patient wait time decreased. Physicians may consider using remote scribes to enhance patient satisfaction and clinical flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251340104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251340104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether remote scribing is associated with patient satisfaction. Methods: Physicians were included based on predetermined criteria. For all physicians, Net Promoter Score response data were collected for 3 consecutive months immediately before and 6 months after the transition to remote scribes. Over 2 years, 272 885 responses were analyzed. Patient time spent in the office was also assessed. Results: Twenty-three physicians transitioned to remote scribes between March 2022 and September 2023. For participating physicians, the mean Net Promoter Score rating improved from 9.34 to 9.44 (P = .008) for "likelihood of recommending physician" and from 9.54 to 9.60 (P < .001) for "likelihood of recommending practice." After the transition, the mean time spent in the "primary waiting room" decreased from 14.88 minutes to 13.41 minutes (P < .001) and the mean time spent in the "exam room" decreased from 22.89 minutes to 21.22 minutes (P < .001). All secondary outcomes improved after the transition. Conclusions: After implementing remote scribes and based on Net Promoter Score ratings, patient satisfaction scores improved and patient wait time decreased. Physicians may consider using remote scribes to enhance patient satisfaction and clinical flow.

眼科患者满意度:远程抄写员的影响。
目的:确定远程抄写是否与患者满意度相关。方法:根据预先确定的标准纳入医生。对于所有的医生,在转换到远程抄写员之前和之后的连续3个月收集净推荐值反应数据。在2年多的时间里,分析了272 885份回复。患者在办公室的时间也被评估。结果:2022年3月至2023年9月期间,23名医生转为远程抄写员。对于参与的医生,“推荐医生的可能性”的平均净推荐评分从9.34提高到9.44 (P = 0.008),“推荐实践的可能性”的平均净推荐评分从9.54提高到9.60 (P < 0.001)。转换后,在“主候诊室”的平均时间从14.88分钟减少到13.41分钟(P < 0.001),在“检查室”的平均时间从22.89分钟减少到21.22分钟(P < 0.001)。所有次要结果均在过渡后得到改善。结论:实施远程抄写器后,基于净推荐评分评分,患者满意度得分提高,患者等待时间减少。医生可以考虑使用远程抄写员来提高患者满意度和临床流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信