Limited Knowledge on Asthma and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique Among Health Care Professionals Attending Asthmatic Patients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Grace Ambrose Shayo, Aisha Awadh, Mwanaada Ahmed Kilima
{"title":"Limited Knowledge on Asthma and Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique Among Health Care Professionals Attending Asthmatic Patients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.","authors":"Grace Ambrose Shayo, Aisha Awadh, Mwanaada Ahmed Kilima","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Receiving wrong health education from health care professionals (HCPs) might contribute to patients' poor inhaler technique. We set out to investigate HCPs' knowledge on asthma and metered-dose inhaler technique in selected health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a cross-sectional study done from August 2020 to February 2021, participant's demographics were recorded. The inhaler technique was assessed using a 12-step checklist. Participants had correct inhaler technique when all the steps were performed correctly; otherwise, the technique was poor. An 18-question questionnaire for health care professional knowledge was used to assess asthma knowledge. One point was awarded to each correctly answered question, whereas a zero point was given to a wrongly answered or unanswered question. Knowledge was adequate if the score was 13/18 or higher. Chi-square was used to compare categorical data, while analysis of variance was used for comparison of mean scores for asthma knowledge and inhaler technique. A <i>p</i> value ≤0.05 was considered significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 114 participants were enrolled; 57% were medical officers, and 59.6% had work experience of <5 years. The majority (53.5%) had no training on inhaler technique, and 75% had inadequate knowledge on asthma. Good asthma knowledge was associated with age ≥40 years (<i>p</i> = 0.039) and being a medical specialist (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Only 4.4% of the participants did all the steps of inhaler technique correctly. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Knowledge on asthma and inhaler use technique is generally lacking among health care professionals. In-service training on asthma and inhaler demonstration should be considered for HCPs in asthma clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Receiving wrong health education from health care professionals (HCPs) might contribute to patients' poor inhaler technique. We set out to investigate HCPs' knowledge on asthma and metered-dose inhaler technique in selected health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Methods: In a cross-sectional study done from August 2020 to February 2021, participant's demographics were recorded. The inhaler technique was assessed using a 12-step checklist. Participants had correct inhaler technique when all the steps were performed correctly; otherwise, the technique was poor. An 18-question questionnaire for health care professional knowledge was used to assess asthma knowledge. One point was awarded to each correctly answered question, whereas a zero point was given to a wrongly answered or unanswered question. Knowledge was adequate if the score was 13/18 or higher. Chi-square was used to compare categorical data, while analysis of variance was used for comparison of mean scores for asthma knowledge and inhaler technique. A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 114 participants were enrolled; 57% were medical officers, and 59.6% had work experience of <5 years. The majority (53.5%) had no training on inhaler technique, and 75% had inadequate knowledge on asthma. Good asthma knowledge was associated with age ≥40 years (p = 0.039) and being a medical specialist (p = 0.002). Only 4.4% of the participants did all the steps of inhaler technique correctly. Conclusion: Knowledge on asthma and inhaler use technique is generally lacking among health care professionals. In-service training on asthma and inhaler demonstration should be considered for HCPs in asthma clinics.

坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的哮喘患者的医疗保健专业人员对哮喘和加压计量吸入器技术的了解有限。
从卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)接受错误的健康教育可能导致患者吸入器技术不良。我们着手在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆选定的卫生设施中调查医务人员对哮喘和计量吸入器技术的知识。方法:在2020年8月至2021年2月进行的横断面研究中,记录了参与者的人口统计数据。采用12步检查表对吸入器技术进行评估。当所有步骤都正确执行时,参与者具有正确的吸入器技术;否则,技术很差。采用18题卫生保健专业知识问卷对哮喘知识进行评估。正确回答一个问题得一分,错误回答或未回答一个问题得零分。如果得分在13/18或更高,知识就足够了。分类数据比较采用卡方分析,哮喘知识和吸入器技术的平均得分比较采用方差分析。p值≤0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共纳入114名受试者;57%是医务人员,59.6%有工作经验(p = 0.039)和专科医生(p = 0.002)。只有4.4%的参与者正确地完成了吸入器技术的所有步骤。结论:卫生保健专业人员普遍缺乏哮喘知识和吸入器使用技术。应考虑对哮喘病诊所的医务人员进行在职哮喘培训和吸入器示范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信