Advances in organ protection: ischemic preconditioning and erythropoietin as protective strategies.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jingying Wang, Wanlu Tao, Zhentao Guo, Jinxin Liu
{"title":"Advances in organ protection: ischemic preconditioning and erythropoietin as protective strategies.","authors":"Jingying Wang, Wanlu Tao, Zhentao Guo, Jinxin Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04586-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and erythropoietin (EPO) are known for their protective effects against organ damage caused by ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion (I/R), and certain drugs. This review aims to summarize the literature on IPC and EPO, focusing on their mechanisms and exploring their relationship in organ protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed databases was conducted using keywords, such as IPC, EPO, ischemia-reperfusion, and organ protection. Articles were screened for relevance to IPC or EPO-mediated organ protection, excluding studies on hypoxic preconditioning and pharmacological preconditioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IPC and EPO have demonstrated protective effects across various organs, including kidneys, liver, heart, small intestine, retina, stomach, pancreas, and nervous system. They exert their effects through anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-inflammatory mechanisms involving distinct signaling pathways. Evidence suggests a potential interaction between IPC and EPO, with IPC potentially elevating serum EPO levels and EPO enhancing the protective effects of IPC, particularly in the heart via the JAK-STAT pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPC and EPO hold promise as therapeutic strategies for mitigating organ damage in ischemic conditions. Further research is needed to elucidate their interaction in organ protection given the current limitations in evidence. Nonetheless, their individual mechanisms and clinical applications underscore their potential utility in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04586-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and erythropoietin (EPO) are known for their protective effects against organ damage caused by ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion (I/R), and certain drugs. This review aims to summarize the literature on IPC and EPO, focusing on their mechanisms and exploring their relationship in organ protection.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed databases was conducted using keywords, such as IPC, EPO, ischemia-reperfusion, and organ protection. Articles were screened for relevance to IPC or EPO-mediated organ protection, excluding studies on hypoxic preconditioning and pharmacological preconditioning.

Results: IPC and EPO have demonstrated protective effects across various organs, including kidneys, liver, heart, small intestine, retina, stomach, pancreas, and nervous system. They exert their effects through anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-inflammatory mechanisms involving distinct signaling pathways. Evidence suggests a potential interaction between IPC and EPO, with IPC potentially elevating serum EPO levels and EPO enhancing the protective effects of IPC, particularly in the heart via the JAK-STAT pathway.

Conclusions: IPC and EPO hold promise as therapeutic strategies for mitigating organ damage in ischemic conditions. Further research is needed to elucidate their interaction in organ protection given the current limitations in evidence. Nonetheless, their individual mechanisms and clinical applications underscore their potential utility in clinical settings.

器官保护研究进展:缺血预处理和促红细胞生成素作为保护策略。
背景:缺血预处理(IPC)和促红细胞生成素(EPO)对缺血、缺血再灌注(I/R)和某些药物引起的器官损伤具有保护作用。本文综述了IPC和EPO的相关文献,重点阐述了它们的作用机制,并探讨了它们在器官保护中的关系。方法:以IPC、EPO、缺血再灌注、器官保护等关键词对PubMed数据库进行综合检索。筛选与IPC或epo介导的器官保护相关的文章,不包括缺氧预处理和药物预处理的研究。结果:IPC和EPO在多个器官,包括肾脏、肝脏、心脏、小肠、视网膜、胃、胰腺和神经系统中显示出保护作用。它们通过涉及不同信号通路的抗凋亡、抗氧化应激和抗炎机制发挥作用。有证据表明IPC和EPO之间存在潜在的相互作用,IPC可能提高血清EPO水平,而EPO通过JAK-STAT途径增强IPC的保护作用,特别是在心脏中。结论:IPC和EPO有望作为减轻缺血性器官损伤的治疗策略。鉴于目前证据有限,需要进一步研究阐明它们在器官保护中的相互作用。尽管如此,它们的个体机制和临床应用强调了它们在临床环境中的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信