Chronic migraine and bilateral occlusion of the middle meningeal artery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
José Ricardo Vanzin, Luciano Bambini Manzato
{"title":"Chronic migraine and bilateral occlusion of the middle meningeal artery.","authors":"José Ricardo Vanzin, Luciano Bambini Manzato","doi":"10.1177/15910199251337520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMigraine is the most common neurological problem in primary care affecting 18% of women and 6% of men, while chronic migraine affects 2% of the population and refractory migraine is estimated to affect between 5% and 30% of migraine sufferers. The dura is a well-vascularized structure, which is densely innervated by pain fibers. Intra-arterial administration of lidocaine in the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has been used for refractory migraine, promoting pain relief. Patients with chronic headaches who underwent embolization of the MMA for the prevention of chronic subdural hematoma recurrence experienced complete resolution of pain.MethodsBased on this data, we treated 10 patients consecutively with chronic and refractory migraine with a high degree of disability assessed by headache impact test (HIT-6) who experimented with pain relief with lidocaine injection and subsequently underwent definitive bilateral occlusion of the MMA with biological glue.ResultsMean age was 48.2 ± 14.4, with 90% being female, all patients confirmed primary headache in the lidocaine suppression test (LST) and after bilateral occlusion was observed worsening of pain between 0 h and 6 h (-0.9 (95% CI -2.2-0.6, <i>P</i> = 0.193) with complete improvement at discharge within 24 h. In the 30-day follow-up, we observed a significant improvement in HIT-6, 30.5 (95% CI 25.5-35.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001) that lasted up to 6 months. No neurological or technical complications were observed.ConclusionsPatients with chronic or refractory migraine, rigorously selected through the LST, may benefit from bilateral occlusion of the MMA for a period of up to 6 months, without additional risks. Despite the positive results, we must emphasize the preliminary nature of these findings, especially given the small sample size. A multicenter, randomized study is needed to prove the efficacy and safety of this new treatment and it may be an alternative for a specific subset of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251337520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251337520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMigraine is the most common neurological problem in primary care affecting 18% of women and 6% of men, while chronic migraine affects 2% of the population and refractory migraine is estimated to affect between 5% and 30% of migraine sufferers. The dura is a well-vascularized structure, which is densely innervated by pain fibers. Intra-arterial administration of lidocaine in the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has been used for refractory migraine, promoting pain relief. Patients with chronic headaches who underwent embolization of the MMA for the prevention of chronic subdural hematoma recurrence experienced complete resolution of pain.MethodsBased on this data, we treated 10 patients consecutively with chronic and refractory migraine with a high degree of disability assessed by headache impact test (HIT-6) who experimented with pain relief with lidocaine injection and subsequently underwent definitive bilateral occlusion of the MMA with biological glue.ResultsMean age was 48.2 ± 14.4, with 90% being female, all patients confirmed primary headache in the lidocaine suppression test (LST) and after bilateral occlusion was observed worsening of pain between 0 h and 6 h (-0.9 (95% CI -2.2-0.6, P = 0.193) with complete improvement at discharge within 24 h. In the 30-day follow-up, we observed a significant improvement in HIT-6, 30.5 (95% CI 25.5-35.5, P < 0.001) that lasted up to 6 months. No neurological or technical complications were observed.ConclusionsPatients with chronic or refractory migraine, rigorously selected through the LST, may benefit from bilateral occlusion of the MMA for a period of up to 6 months, without additional risks. Despite the positive results, we must emphasize the preliminary nature of these findings, especially given the small sample size. A multicenter, randomized study is needed to prove the efficacy and safety of this new treatment and it may be an alternative for a specific subset of patients.

慢性偏头痛和双侧脑膜中动脉闭塞。
背景:偏头痛是初级保健中最常见的神经系统问题,影响18%的女性和6%的男性,而慢性偏头痛影响2%的人口,难治性偏头痛估计影响5%至30%的偏头痛患者。硬脑膜是一个血管丰富的结构,由疼痛纤维密集支配。在脑膜中动脉(MMA)动脉内给药利多卡因已被用于治疗难治性偏头痛,促进疼痛缓解。慢性头痛患者经MMA栓塞预防慢性硬膜下血肿复发后疼痛完全缓解。方法在此基础上,我们连续治疗了10例慢性难治偏头痛患者,这些患者通过头痛冲击试验(HIT-6)评估为高度残疾,他们先用利多卡因注射缓解疼痛,然后用生物胶封堵双侧MMA。结果患者平均年龄为48.2±14.4岁,女性占90%,所有患者在利多卡因抑制试验(LST)中均确诊为原发性头痛,双侧咬合后疼痛在0 ~ 6 h间加重(-0.9 (95% CI -2.2 ~ 0.6, P = 0.193),出院时24 h内完全改善。在30天的随访中,我们观察到HIT-6的显著改善,为30.5 (95% CI 25.5-35.5, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信