Evolving Paradigms in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in Taiwan: A Comparative Study of 2003 and 2021.

IF 0.8 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Chia-Hao Chou, Cheng-Jen Chen, Wei-Ting Shi, Chia-Hsiang Hsu, Po-Chang Huang, I-Chun Ma, Ming-Yuan Hong
{"title":"Evolving Paradigms in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in Taiwan: A Comparative Study of 2003 and 2021.","authors":"Chia-Hao Chou, Cheng-Jen Chen, Wei-Ting Shi, Chia-Hsiang Hsu, Po-Chang Huang, I-Chun Ma, Ming-Yuan Hong","doi":"10.6705/j.jacme.202506_15(2).0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The observational study examines the evolution of emergency medicine residency programs in Taiwan, comparing key program attributes between 2003 and 2021. To identify significant changes in emergency medicine resident program structure, educational resources, and operational aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the previous study carried out in 2003, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 22 specified items across four domains: contact information, training content, faculty and research, and patient care and benefits, comparing key program attributes between 2003 and 2021. Chi-Square test used for the categorical variables statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of programs detailing faculty descriptions increased markedly from 63% in 2003 to 95% in 2021, while the mention of residency director roles rose from 4% to 32% in the same period. Conversely, the detailed enumeration of faculty numbers and elective course features saw a decline. Furthermore, the study identified stable areas, such as benefits other than salary and patient numbers, suggesting established standards or external limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The substantial improvements in program structure and educational resources highlight ongoing efforts to enhance training quality and adapt to the changing healthcare landscape. This study contributes valuable insights into the progression of emergency medicine residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acute medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acute medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202506_15(2).0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The observational study examines the evolution of emergency medicine residency programs in Taiwan, comparing key program attributes between 2003 and 2021. To identify significant changes in emergency medicine resident program structure, educational resources, and operational aspects.

Methods: According to the previous study carried out in 2003, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 22 specified items across four domains: contact information, training content, faculty and research, and patient care and benefits, comparing key program attributes between 2003 and 2021. Chi-Square test used for the categorical variables statistical analysis.

Results: The proportion of programs detailing faculty descriptions increased markedly from 63% in 2003 to 95% in 2021, while the mention of residency director roles rose from 4% to 32% in the same period. Conversely, the detailed enumeration of faculty numbers and elective course features saw a decline. Furthermore, the study identified stable areas, such as benefits other than salary and patient numbers, suggesting established standards or external limitations.

Conclusions: The substantial improvements in program structure and educational resources highlight ongoing efforts to enhance training quality and adapt to the changing healthcare landscape. This study contributes valuable insights into the progression of emergency medicine residency.

台湾急诊科住院医师课程发展模式:2003年与2021年之比较研究。
背景:本观察性研究探讨台湾急诊医学住院医师计划的演变,比较2003年至2021年间的关键计划属性。确定急诊医学住院医师项目结构、教育资源和操作方面的重大变化。方法:根据2003年开展的前期研究,我们对联系方式、培训内容、教师和研究、患者护理和福利等4个领域的22个指定项目进行了综合分析,比较了2003年至2021年的关键项目属性。分类变量采用卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:详细描述教师描述的项目比例从2003年的63%显著增加到2021年的95%,而住院医师主任角色的提及也从4%上升到32%。相反,详细列举教员人数和选修课特征的数量却减少了。此外,该研究确定了稳定的领域,如工资和患者数量以外的福利,表明了既定的标准或外部限制。结论:项目结构和教育资源的实质性改进突出了提高培训质量和适应不断变化的医疗保健环境的持续努力。本研究为急诊医学住院医师的发展提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of acute medicine
Journal of acute medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信