The Effects of Different Resistance Training Modalities on Muscle Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1159/000546346
Tim Wiedenmann, Steffen Held, Tobias Morat, Ludwig Rappelt, Eduard Isenmann, Elena Berndsen, Nils-Holger Hopp, Lars Donath
{"title":"The Effects of Different Resistance Training Modalities on Muscle Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tim Wiedenmann, Steffen Held, Tobias Morat, Ludwig Rappelt, Eduard Isenmann, Elena Berndsen, Nils-Holger Hopp, Lars Donath","doi":"10.1159/000546346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resistance training is widely recognized as a valuable method to enhance physical function, reduce the risk of falls, and improve overall health, independence and well-being in older adults. The training can be performed through various modalities of which the comparative effects have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This network meta-analysis (NMA) therefore aims to compare and rank different resistance training modalities regarding their effects on strength outcomes in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The studies included in this NMA were identified through a comprehensive search across three health-related and biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus). We included (randomized) controlled trials that assessed the effect of resistance training modes (including: free weight training, machine-based training, bodyweight training, elastic band training, and mixed training) in comparison to each other or to a control condition, focusing on traditional maximal strength outcomes in older individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This NMA includes 102 trials involving 4,754 community-dwelling seniors with a mean age of 70 ± 4 years (range 63-87 years of age). All of the included resistance training modalities yield moderate to large positive effects on strength when compared to a \"no intervention\" control condition. Machine-based training {standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16; 1.52)} elicits the largest effects, followed by free weight (SMD = 1.15 [95% CI: 0.28; 2.03]), elastic band (SMD = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.49; 1.37]), mixed (SMD = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.51; 1.25]), and bodyweight training (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.16; 1.26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-based training elicits the largest effects with the smallest variance. However, our findings demonstrate that various resistance-training modalities can have large positive effects on strength development in older adults. We suggest that, with adequately chosen load criteria such as training intensity, volume and duration of the training period, the selection of the appropriate resistance training type might depend on individual preference, enjoyability, and practicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"576-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Resistance training is widely recognized as a valuable method to enhance physical function, reduce the risk of falls, and improve overall health, independence and well-being in older adults. The training can be performed through various modalities of which the comparative effects have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This network meta-analysis (NMA) therefore aims to compare and rank different resistance training modalities regarding their effects on strength outcomes in older adults.

Methods: The studies included in this NMA were identified through a comprehensive search across three health-related and biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus). We included (randomized) controlled trials that assessed the effect of resistance training modes (including: free weight training, machine-based training, bodyweight training, elastic band training, and mixed training) in comparison to each other or to a control condition, focusing on traditional maximal strength outcomes in older individuals.

Results: This NMA includes 102 trials involving 4,754 community-dwelling seniors with a mean age of 70 ± 4 years (range 63-87 years of age). All of the included resistance training modalities yield moderate to large positive effects on strength when compared to a "no intervention" control condition. Machine-based training {standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16; 1.52)} elicits the largest effects, followed by free weight (SMD = 1.15 [95% CI: 0.28; 2.03]), elastic band (SMD = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.49; 1.37]), mixed (SMD = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.51; 1.25]), and bodyweight training (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.16; 1.26]).

Conclusion: Machine-based training elicits the largest effects with the smallest variance. However, our findings demonstrate that various resistance-training modalities can have large positive effects on strength development in older adults. We suggest that, with adequately chosen load criteria such as training intensity, volume and duration of the training period, the selection of the appropriate resistance training type might depend on individual preference, enjoyability, and practicability.

不同抗阻训练方式对社区老年人肌肉力量的影响:网络荟萃分析。
简介:阻力训练被广泛认为是一种有价值的方法,可以增强身体功能,减少跌倒的风险,改善老年人的整体健康、独立性和幸福感。训练可以通过各种方式进行,其比较效果尚未得到彻底阐明。因此,本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较和排名不同的阻力训练模式对老年人力量结果的影响。方法:通过对三个健康相关和生物医学数据库(PubMed、Web of Science和SPORTDiscus)的综合检索,确定纳入本NMA的研究。我们纳入了(随机)对照试验,这些试验评估了阻力训练模式(包括:自由重量训练、机器训练、体重训练、弹力带训练和混合训练)相互比较或与对照条件比较的效果,重点关注老年人传统的最大力量结果。结果:该NMA包括102项试验,涉及4754名平均年龄为70±4岁(63至87岁)的社区老年人。与“无干预”控制条件相比,所有包括的阻力训练模式对力量产生了中等到较大的积极影响。基于机器的训练(SMD = 1.34) [95% ci: 1.16;1.52])的影响最大,其次是自由体重(SMD = 1.15 [95%-CI: 0.28;2.03]),弹力带(SMD = 0.93 [95%-CI: 0.49;1.37]),混合(SMD = 0.88 [95%-CI: 0.51;1.25])和体重训练(SMD = 0.71 [95%-CI: 0.16;1.26])。结论:机器训练的效果最大,方差最小。然而,我们的研究结果表明,各种阻力训练方式对老年人的力量发展有很大的积极影响。我们建议,在充分选择负荷标准(如训练强度、训练量和训练期持续时间)的情况下,选择合适的阻力训练类型可能取决于个人偏好、享受性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信