A Systematic Investigation of the Common Genetic Architecture of Substance Use Traits and the Relationship with Mental Health.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Joëlle A Pasman, Andrea G Allegrini, Adria Tunez, Abdel Abdellaoui, Dirk J A Smit, Michel G Nivard, Jacqueline M Vink, Karin J H Verweij
{"title":"A Systematic Investigation of the Common Genetic Architecture of Substance Use Traits and the Relationship with Mental Health.","authors":"Joëlle A Pasman, Andrea G Allegrini, Adria Tunez, Abdel Abdellaoui, Dirk J A Smit, Michel G Nivard, Jacqueline M Vink, Karin J H Verweij","doi":"10.1159/000546680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding shared and unique genetic vulnerability for substance use traits will give insight into the etiology of their comorbidity with psychiatric and other health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied genomic structural equation modeling to summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to map the genetic architecture of fourteen substance use traits across five substances (tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opioids) and three stages (initiation, frequency, and dependence). We systematically compared data-driven and theory-based models and conducted sensitivity analyses. We estimated the genetic correlations between the latent factors and psychiatric, physical, socioeconomic, cognitive, and social traits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A wide range of models could be fit to the data. A data-driven 4-factor model was the most parsimonious, although bifactor models per substance or per stage also fit well. The four factors from the data-driven model were named smoking/other, dependence, alcohol, and cannabis. F1-smoking/other was most strongly related to socioeconomic traits (negatively), whereas F2-dependence and F4-cannabis were mostly related to externalizing and risk behavior (positively). F3-alcohol showed weaker overlap with unfavorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic risk for substance use traits is partly overlapping, both per substance and per stage of use. Contrasting such categories' liability profiles provides insight into differences in their etiology and associations with poor outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding shared and unique genetic vulnerability for substance use traits will give insight into the etiology of their comorbidity with psychiatric and other health outcomes.

Methods: We applied genomic structural equation modeling to summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to map the genetic architecture of fourteen substance use traits across five substances (tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opioids) and three stages (initiation, frequency, and dependence). We systematically compared data-driven and theory-based models and conducted sensitivity analyses. We estimated the genetic correlations between the latent factors and psychiatric, physical, socioeconomic, cognitive, and social traits.

Results: A wide range of models could be fit to the data. A data-driven 4-factor model was the most parsimonious, although bifactor models per substance or per stage also fit well. The four factors from the data-driven model were named smoking/other, dependence, alcohol, and cannabis. F1-smoking/other was most strongly related to socioeconomic traits (negatively), whereas F2-dependence and F4-cannabis were mostly related to externalizing and risk behavior (positively). F3-alcohol showed weaker overlap with unfavorable outcomes.

Conclusions: Genetic risk for substance use traits is partly overlapping, both per substance and per stage of use. Contrasting such categories' liability profiles provides insight into differences in their etiology and associations with poor outcomes.

物质使用特征的共同遗传结构及其与心理健康的关系的系统调查。
前言:了解物质使用特征的共同和独特的遗传易感性将有助于深入了解其与精神疾病和其他健康结果共病的病因学。方法:我们应用基因组结构方程模型对全基因组关联研究(GWASs)的统计数据进行汇总,绘制了5种物质(烟草、酒精、大麻、可卡因和阿片类药物)和3个阶段(起始、频率、依赖)的14种物质使用特征的遗传结构。我们系统地比较了数据驱动模型和理论驱动模型,并进行了敏感性分析。我们估计了潜在因素与精神、生理、社会经济、认知和社会特征之间的遗传相关性。结果:数据可拟合广泛的模型。数据驱动的4因素模型是最简洁的,尽管每个物质或每个阶段的双因素模型也很适合。数据驱动模型中的四个因素分别是吸烟/其他、依赖、酒精和大麻。f1 -吸烟/其他与社会经济特征的相关性最强(负相关),而f2 -依赖和f4 -大麻与外化和风险行为的相关性最大(正相关)。f3 -醇表现出较弱的重叠和不利的结果。结论:物质使用特征的遗传风险部分重叠,无论是对物质还是对使用阶段。对比这些类别的责任概况可以深入了解其病因差异以及与不良结果的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信