Equine veterinarians' care priorities regarding vaccination, colic, lameness and pre-purchase scenarios.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Yteke Elte, Inga Wolframm, Hans Vernooij, Mirjam Nielen, René van Weeren
{"title":"Equine veterinarians' care priorities regarding vaccination, colic, lameness and pre-purchase scenarios.","authors":"Yteke Elte, Inga Wolframm, Hans Vernooij, Mirjam Nielen, René van Weeren","doi":"10.1111/evj.14537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equine veterinarians play a crucial role in maintaining equine health and ensuring client satisfaction. Understanding their perspectives on key aspects of veterinary care is essential for optimising outcomes for both clients and horses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and compare the importance equine veterinarians place on seven key aspects of client satisfaction in equine veterinary practice (quality of care, quality of service, horsemanship, interpersonal skills, transfer of knowledge, financial aspects and professionalism) across four different scenarios.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 246 equine veterinarians participated in the online survey, which included ranking the seven aspects of equine veterinary care across four scenarios. The data were analysed using Friedman tests to assess differences within and across scenarios, followed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc comparisons. Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine differences between groups of veterinarians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quality of care was ranked most important in the colic (median rank: 1, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-2) and lameness (median rank: 1, IQR: 1-2) scenarios (p < 0.001), reflecting the critical nature of these conditions. Quality of service showed no differences in ranking across the scenarios. Professionalism was ranked significantly more important in the pre-purchase scenario (median rank: 2, IQR: 1-3) compared to other scenarios (p < 0.001). Financial aspects were consistently ranked least important (median rank: 7, IQR: 6-7, p < 0.001). No differences in ranking were found between different groups of veterinarians.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Participants may not accurately represent the diversity and characteristics of the entire equine veterinary population. The scenarios do not fully encompass the diversity of equine veterinary practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equine veterinarians prioritise quality of care, quality of service and professionalism in their practice, with some variations depending on the clinical scenario. Financial aspects were consistently given the lowest priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Equine veterinarians play a crucial role in maintaining equine health and ensuring client satisfaction. Understanding their perspectives on key aspects of veterinary care is essential for optimising outcomes for both clients and horses.

Objectives: To identify and compare the importance equine veterinarians place on seven key aspects of client satisfaction in equine veterinary practice (quality of care, quality of service, horsemanship, interpersonal skills, transfer of knowledge, financial aspects and professionalism) across four different scenarios.

Study design: A cross-sectional survey-based study.

Methods: A total of 246 equine veterinarians participated in the online survey, which included ranking the seven aspects of equine veterinary care across four scenarios. The data were analysed using Friedman tests to assess differences within and across scenarios, followed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc comparisons. Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine differences between groups of veterinarians.

Results: Quality of care was ranked most important in the colic (median rank: 1, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-2) and lameness (median rank: 1, IQR: 1-2) scenarios (p < 0.001), reflecting the critical nature of these conditions. Quality of service showed no differences in ranking across the scenarios. Professionalism was ranked significantly more important in the pre-purchase scenario (median rank: 2, IQR: 1-3) compared to other scenarios (p < 0.001). Financial aspects were consistently ranked least important (median rank: 7, IQR: 6-7, p < 0.001). No differences in ranking were found between different groups of veterinarians.

Main limitations: Participants may not accurately represent the diversity and characteristics of the entire equine veterinary population. The scenarios do not fully encompass the diversity of equine veterinary practice.

Conclusions: Equine veterinarians prioritise quality of care, quality of service and professionalism in their practice, with some variations depending on the clinical scenario. Financial aspects were consistently given the lowest priority.

马兽医关于疫苗接种、绞痛、跛行和购买前情景的护理重点。
背景:马兽医在维护马的健康和确保客户满意度方面发挥着至关重要的作用。了解他们对兽医护理关键方面的看法对于优化客户和马匹的结果至关重要。目的:在四种不同的情况下,确定并比较马兽医在马兽医实践中对客户满意度的七个关键方面(护理质量、服务质量、马术、人际交往能力、知识转移、财务方面和专业精神)的重要性。研究设计:基于横断面调查的研究。方法:共有246名马兽医参与了在线调查,包括对4种场景下马兽医护理的7个方面进行排名。使用Friedman检验对数据进行分析,以评估方案内部和方案之间的差异,随后使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Bonferroni校正进行事后比较。使用Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验来确定兽医组之间的差异。结果:在绞痛(中位数排名:1,四分位间距[IQR]: 1-2)和跛行(中位数排名:1,IQR: 1-2)情况下,护理质量被评为最重要的(p)。主要局限性:参与者可能无法准确代表整个马兽医群体的多样性和特征。这些情景并没有完全涵盖马兽医实践的多样性。结论:马兽医在实践中优先考虑护理质量、服务质量和专业性,根据临床情况有一些变化。财政方面一直是最不优先的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信