Novel Noninvasive Tests for Liver Fibrosis: Moving Beyond Simple Tests in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
John T Grady, John W Cyrus, Richard K Sterling
{"title":"Novel Noninvasive Tests for Liver Fibrosis: Moving Beyond Simple Tests in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.","authors":"John T Grady, John W Cyrus, Richard K Sterling","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.02.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Noninvasive tests serve as alternative options to liver biopsy for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. The Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate platelet ratio index, and liver stiffness measurement by transient and magnetic resonance elastography are guideline-supported tools for noninvasive liver disease assessment but are limited by indeterminate ranges and varying diagnostic performance among different patient populations. In this scoping review, we evaluate the performance of novel noninvasive liver disease assessments in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) not discussed in recent professional guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature over the past 5 years (2020 to present) to identify studies evaluating noninvasive liver disease assessments (NILDAs) in MASLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 912 records, 48 met inclusion criteria: 37 through the systematic review and 11 identified by the authors. Of the 15 novel scores, several perform well in steatotic liver disease in validation studies and included routinely available elements. Although several novel scores had good to excellent discrimination, their cost and availability may limit their use in practice. Based on our review, we propose starting with the FIB-4 index, given its availability, low cost, and high negative predictive value. In those with a FIB-4 >1.3, we propose using Agile 3+ or 4 to identify advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NILDAs are effective alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment in MASLD and may serve as a tool to identify patients who are candidates for newer therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.02.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Noninvasive tests serve as alternative options to liver biopsy for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. The Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate platelet ratio index, and liver stiffness measurement by transient and magnetic resonance elastography are guideline-supported tools for noninvasive liver disease assessment but are limited by indeterminate ranges and varying diagnostic performance among different patient populations. In this scoping review, we evaluate the performance of novel noninvasive liver disease assessments in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) not discussed in recent professional guidelines.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature over the past 5 years (2020 to present) to identify studies evaluating noninvasive liver disease assessments (NILDAs) in MASLD.

Results: Of the 912 records, 48 met inclusion criteria: 37 through the systematic review and 11 identified by the authors. Of the 15 novel scores, several perform well in steatotic liver disease in validation studies and included routinely available elements. Although several novel scores had good to excellent discrimination, their cost and availability may limit their use in practice. Based on our review, we propose starting with the FIB-4 index, given its availability, low cost, and high negative predictive value. In those with a FIB-4 >1.3, we propose using Agile 3+ or 4 to identify advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Conclusions: NILDAs are effective alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment in MASLD and may serve as a tool to identify patients who are candidates for newer therapies.

新型无创肝纤维化检测:代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病的简单检测
背景和目的:无创检查可作为肝活检诊断肝纤维化的替代选择。纤维化4 (FIB-4)指数、天冬氨酸血小板比率指数(APRI)和瞬时和磁共振弹性成像测量肝脏硬度是指南支持的无创肝病评估工具,但由于范围不确定和不同患者群体的诊断性能不同而受到限制。在这篇范围综述中,我们评估了新型无创肝病评估在代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)中的表现,在最近的专业指南中没有讨论。方法:我们系统地回顾了过去5年(2020年至今)的文献,以确定在MASLD中评估NILDAs的研究。结果:912条记录中,48条符合纳入标准,其中37条通过系统评价,11条经作者鉴定。在15个新评分中,有几个在验证研究中表现良好,并包括常规可用的元素。虽然一些新颖的分数具有良好到优秀的辨别能力,但它们的成本和可用性可能限制了它们在实践中的使用。基于我们的回顾,我们建议从FIB-4指数开始,因为它的可用性,低成本和高负预测价值。对于FIB-4 >1.3的患者,我们建议使用Agile 3+或4来识别晚期纤维化或肝硬化。结论:NILDAs是评估MASLD纤维化的肝活检的有效替代方法,可以作为确定患者是否需要新疗法的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信