Clinical laboratory directorship in Asia-Pacific and North America: Current practices and pathways to global framework development

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Mohammad Erfan Zare , Atefeh Nasir Kansestani , Reza Meshkani , Kannan Vaidyanathan , Chao Qi , Guangwei Dai , Feng Zhao , Rui An , Jun Zhang
{"title":"Clinical laboratory directorship in Asia-Pacific and North America: Current practices and pathways to global framework development","authors":"Mohammad Erfan Zare ,&nbsp;Atefeh Nasir Kansestani ,&nbsp;Reza Meshkani ,&nbsp;Kannan Vaidyanathan ,&nbsp;Chao Qi ,&nbsp;Guangwei Dai ,&nbsp;Feng Zhao ,&nbsp;Rui An ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical laboratories are essential to modern healthcare, playing a critical role in diagnosing, monitoring, and managing diseases. Laboratory directors, as the highest authority in the laboratory, are responsible for overseeing operations, ensuring test accuracy, maintaining quality control, and safeguarding patient safety. These directors are highly qualified professionals, but the qualifications required for the role vary significantly across countries. In some countries, medical doctors (MDs) are the standard, while in others, non-MD clinical scientists are eligible for the position. This variation presents challenges, leading to ongoing discussions in scientific societies about the best pathways to prepare individuals for this critical role. This debate underscores the need to balance clinical expertise with specialized scientific knowledge to meet the evolving demands of laboratory medicine. To address these challenges, establishing a global common pathway for laboratory directorship qualifications is essential. Recognizing the diversity of qualification systems across countries is crucial for developing a pathway that can be globally adaptable and applicable to various healthcare contexts. Drawing inspiration from successful models around the world will be key in shaping such a framework. Europe, with its well-documented qualification frameworks, has made significant efforts toward harmonizing standards for laboratory directorship. However, data on qualification systems in regions like Asia-Pacific and North America remain limited. This review aims to evaluate the current qualification requirements in these regions, compare them to established models, and discuss the feasibility of creating a globally standardized pathway for laboratory director qualifications. The findings could serve as the foundation for developing a more detailed, common curriculum by international scientific societies such as the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), addressing the demands of various countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"576 ","pages":"Article 120407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125002864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical laboratories are essential to modern healthcare, playing a critical role in diagnosing, monitoring, and managing diseases. Laboratory directors, as the highest authority in the laboratory, are responsible for overseeing operations, ensuring test accuracy, maintaining quality control, and safeguarding patient safety. These directors are highly qualified professionals, but the qualifications required for the role vary significantly across countries. In some countries, medical doctors (MDs) are the standard, while in others, non-MD clinical scientists are eligible for the position. This variation presents challenges, leading to ongoing discussions in scientific societies about the best pathways to prepare individuals for this critical role. This debate underscores the need to balance clinical expertise with specialized scientific knowledge to meet the evolving demands of laboratory medicine. To address these challenges, establishing a global common pathway for laboratory directorship qualifications is essential. Recognizing the diversity of qualification systems across countries is crucial for developing a pathway that can be globally adaptable and applicable to various healthcare contexts. Drawing inspiration from successful models around the world will be key in shaping such a framework. Europe, with its well-documented qualification frameworks, has made significant efforts toward harmonizing standards for laboratory directorship. However, data on qualification systems in regions like Asia-Pacific and North America remain limited. This review aims to evaluate the current qualification requirements in these regions, compare them to established models, and discuss the feasibility of creating a globally standardized pathway for laboratory director qualifications. The findings could serve as the foundation for developing a more detailed, common curriculum by international scientific societies such as the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), addressing the demands of various countries.
亚太和北美的临床实验室主任:目前的做法和全球框架发展的途径。
临床实验室对现代医疗保健至关重要,在诊断、监测和管理疾病方面发挥着关键作用。实验室主任作为实验室的最高权力机构,负责监督操作,确保检测准确性,维护质量控制,保障患者安全。这些董事都是非常合格的专业人员,但各国担任这一职务所需的资格差别很大。在一些国家,医生(md)是标准,而在其他国家,非md临床科学家也有资格获得该职位。这种变化带来了挑战,导致科学界正在讨论为个人准备这一关键角色的最佳途径。这场辩论强调需要平衡临床专业知识与专业科学知识,以满足实验室医学不断发展的需求。为了应对这些挑战,建立实验室主任资格的全球共同途径至关重要。认识到各国资格制度的多样性对于制定可在全球范围内适应并适用于各种卫生保健环境的途径至关重要。从世界各地的成功模式中汲取灵感将是形成这样一个框架的关键。欧洲拥有完善的资质框架,已经为协调实验室主任的标准做出了重大努力。然而,亚太和北美等地区资格体系的数据仍然有限。本综述旨在评估这些地区目前的资格要求,将其与已建立的模型进行比较,并讨论创建全球标准化实验室主任资格途径的可行性。这些发现可以作为国际科学学会(如国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会(IFCC))制定更详细的共同课程的基础,以解决各国的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信