The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Association of Breastfeeding's Protective Effect on Postpartum Depression: A Comparative Analysis of Prepandemic and Pandemic Cohorts.
Amanda Vozzola, David E Vozzola, Dikea Roussos-Ross
{"title":"The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Association of Breastfeeding's Protective Effect on Postpartum Depression: A Comparative Analysis of Prepandemic and Pandemic Cohorts.","authors":"Amanda Vozzola, David E Vozzola, Dikea Roussos-Ross","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Before the COVID-19 pandemic, research studies indicated that breastfeeding was protective against postpartum depression (PPD). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the protective association between breastfeeding and PPD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective cohort study by comparing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores for patients in two cohorts, pre-COVID-19 (April 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (April 2020 to February 2021). A cross-sectional design using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and stepwise multiple regression analysis (MRA) analyzed the EPDS scores of a prepandemic cohort (<i>N</i> = 448) and a pandemic cohort (<i>N</i> = 468) of women seen at a tertiary academic medical center for their first postpartum visit. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the prepandemic cohort, 77.3% of breastfeeding women exhibited an unlikely risk for PPD compared with 78.5% in the pandemic cohort. Pearson correlations showed that the breastfeeding group in both cohorts had significantly lower EPDS scores, was less likely to exhibit PPD, and had a lower risk of severe PPD. ANOVA showed that nonbreastfeeding women had significantly higher EPDS scores in both cohorts. Stepwise MRA showed that the EPDS item Q8 (\"I have felt sad or miserable\") was the most significant predictor of PPD in breastfeeding women (both cohorts) and nonbreastfeeding women (prepandemic cohort) but had escalated to Q9 (\"I have been so unhappy that I have been crying\") for nonbreastfeeding women in the pandemic cohort. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In both the prepandemic and pandemic cohorts, breastfeeding women had significantly lower EPDS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, research studies indicated that breastfeeding was protective against postpartum depression (PPD). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the protective association between breastfeeding and PPD. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study by comparing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores for patients in two cohorts, pre-COVID-19 (April 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (April 2020 to February 2021). A cross-sectional design using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and stepwise multiple regression analysis (MRA) analyzed the EPDS scores of a prepandemic cohort (N = 448) and a pandemic cohort (N = 468) of women seen at a tertiary academic medical center for their first postpartum visit. Results: In the prepandemic cohort, 77.3% of breastfeeding women exhibited an unlikely risk for PPD compared with 78.5% in the pandemic cohort. Pearson correlations showed that the breastfeeding group in both cohorts had significantly lower EPDS scores, was less likely to exhibit PPD, and had a lower risk of severe PPD. ANOVA showed that nonbreastfeeding women had significantly higher EPDS scores in both cohorts. Stepwise MRA showed that the EPDS item Q8 ("I have felt sad or miserable") was the most significant predictor of PPD in breastfeeding women (both cohorts) and nonbreastfeeding women (prepandemic cohort) but had escalated to Q9 ("I have been so unhappy that I have been crying") for nonbreastfeeding women in the pandemic cohort. Conclusion: In both the prepandemic and pandemic cohorts, breastfeeding women had significantly lower EPDS scores.
期刊介绍:
Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols.
Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes:
Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols
Health consequences of artificial feeding
Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk
Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother
Breastfeeding indications and contraindications
Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications
Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant
Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother
Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication
Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding
The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking
Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital
Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity
International public health issues including social and economic issues.