Albert Leng, Preetham Bachina, Olivia Liu, Benjamin Shou, Charles Racz, David A Giliver, Ilya Shpitser, Glenn J R Whitman, Sung-Min Cho
{"title":"Enhancing Survival Prediction After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Using Machine Learning.","authors":"Albert Leng, Preetham Bachina, Olivia Liu, Benjamin Shou, Charles Racz, David A Giliver, Ilya Shpitser, Glenn J R Whitman, Sung-Min Cho","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-hospital mortality after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains high. This study compared the performance of the Survival after Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) score with machine learning (ML) models incorporating rich electronic medical record data to evaluate survival for patients on VA-ECMO support. We retrospectively reviewed adults undergoing VA-ECMO (2016-2022) at a single tertiary care center. The CatBoost algorithm was trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) on 74 extracted vital signs, laboratory values, and ventilator settings. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was used to identify key predictive features for logistic regression. Overall, 194 VA-ECMO patients (median age = 58 years, 36.6% female) were included, with 133 (69%) experiencing mortality. The SAVE score was compared to two predictive models: a pre-ECMO model (≤ 24 hours before cannulation) and an on-ECMO model (including up to the first 48 hours of ECMO). The LOOCV area under the receiver-operator characteristics curves (AUC) for the SAVE score, pre-ECMO, and on-ECMO models was 0.73, 0.77, and 0.83, respectively. Logistic regressions using ML-identified variables showed stepwise AUC improvements: 0.82 (pre-ECMO), 0.86 (on-ECMO), and 0.89 (combined). A novel, interpretable ML model predicted survival for VA-ECMO patients with accuracy comparable to the SAVE score. Incorporating on-ECMO variables significantly increased predictive performance and revealed novel variables associated with survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In-hospital mortality after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains high. This study compared the performance of the Survival after Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) score with machine learning (ML) models incorporating rich electronic medical record data to evaluate survival for patients on VA-ECMO support. We retrospectively reviewed adults undergoing VA-ECMO (2016-2022) at a single tertiary care center. The CatBoost algorithm was trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) on 74 extracted vital signs, laboratory values, and ventilator settings. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was used to identify key predictive features for logistic regression. Overall, 194 VA-ECMO patients (median age = 58 years, 36.6% female) were included, with 133 (69%) experiencing mortality. The SAVE score was compared to two predictive models: a pre-ECMO model (≤ 24 hours before cannulation) and an on-ECMO model (including up to the first 48 hours of ECMO). The LOOCV area under the receiver-operator characteristics curves (AUC) for the SAVE score, pre-ECMO, and on-ECMO models was 0.73, 0.77, and 0.83, respectively. Logistic regressions using ML-identified variables showed stepwise AUC improvements: 0.82 (pre-ECMO), 0.86 (on-ECMO), and 0.89 (combined). A novel, interpretable ML model predicted survival for VA-ECMO patients with accuracy comparable to the SAVE score. Incorporating on-ECMO variables significantly increased predictive performance and revealed novel variables associated with survival.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.