Usama Hussein, Wing Kiu Chou, Abhinav Balasubramanian, Jamolbi Rahmatova, Lydia Wilkinson, Arian Arjomandi Rad, Ioannis Dimarakis, Antonios Kourliouros
{"title":"The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Usama Hussein, Wing Kiu Chou, Abhinav Balasubramanian, Jamolbi Rahmatova, Lydia Wilkinson, Arian Arjomandi Rad, Ioannis Dimarakis, Antonios Kourliouros","doi":"10.1111/aor.15025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the current evidence pertaining to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Specifically, the potential of AI/ML in risk stratification, predicting complications, and improving patient outcomes is explored, whereas also identifying key challenges and elucidating avenues of future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies on AI/ML in LVAD implantation up to March 2024. Articles were selected if they utilized AI/ML techniques in LVAD settings and met predefined criteria. A total of 17 studies were included after a rigorous screening and appraisal process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies highlighted the use of ML in five main areas: (1) mortality prediction, where ML models demonstrated higher accuracy compared to traditional models; (2) adverse event prediction, including aortic regurgitation and suction events; (3) myocardial recovery, with ML models outperforming traditional stratification methods; (4) deciphering thrombosis risk, with ML identifying key predictors such as younger age and higher BMI; and (5) right ventricular failure prognostication, within which ML models leveraged hemodynamic and imaging data for superior prediction accuracy. Despite such prevalent advances, challenges including data heterogeneity, lack of causality, and limited generalizability persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI and ML possess transformative potential in optimizing LVAD management, offering both advanced prediction of commonly encountered risk occurrence and personalized care respectively. However, identified issues in AI/ML application, including data interpretability, dataset diversity, and integration into clinical workflows, must be addressed in order to enhance their broader adoption and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This systematic review evaluates the current evidence pertaining to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Specifically, the potential of AI/ML in risk stratification, predicting complications, and improving patient outcomes is explored, whereas also identifying key challenges and elucidating avenues of future research.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies on AI/ML in LVAD implantation up to March 2024. Articles were selected if they utilized AI/ML techniques in LVAD settings and met predefined criteria. A total of 17 studies were included after a rigorous screening and appraisal process.
Results: The included studies highlighted the use of ML in five main areas: (1) mortality prediction, where ML models demonstrated higher accuracy compared to traditional models; (2) adverse event prediction, including aortic regurgitation and suction events; (3) myocardial recovery, with ML models outperforming traditional stratification methods; (4) deciphering thrombosis risk, with ML identifying key predictors such as younger age and higher BMI; and (5) right ventricular failure prognostication, within which ML models leveraged hemodynamic and imaging data for superior prediction accuracy. Despite such prevalent advances, challenges including data heterogeneity, lack of causality, and limited generalizability persist.
Conclusion: AI and ML possess transformative potential in optimizing LVAD management, offering both advanced prediction of commonly encountered risk occurrence and personalized care respectively. However, identified issues in AI/ML application, including data interpretability, dataset diversity, and integration into clinical workflows, must be addressed in order to enhance their broader adoption and impact.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.