Influence of age on outcomes in prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Julia Dorothea Michels-Zetsche, Evelyn Röser, Hilal Ersöz, Benjamin Neetz, Jana C Dahlhoff, Biljana Joves, Frederik Trinkmann, Philipp Höger, Konstantina Kontogianni, Cornelia Weissmann, Max Barre, Sebastian Fähndrich, Florian Bornitz, Michael M Müller, Felix Herth, Franziska Trudzinski
{"title":"Influence of age on outcomes in prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Julia Dorothea Michels-Zetsche, Evelyn Röser, Hilal Ersöz, Benjamin Neetz, Jana C Dahlhoff, Biljana Joves, Frederik Trinkmann, Philipp Höger, Konstantina Kontogianni, Cornelia Weissmann, Max Barre, Sebastian Fähndrich, Florian Bornitz, Michael M Müller, Felix Herth, Franziska Trudzinski","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older age has been identified in many studies as a predictor of poor outcomes in intensive care, including weaning failure. Age is a risk factor for prolonged weaning, resulting in an increased number of geriatric patients being referred to specialist weaning centres. The aim of our analysis was to investigate weaning outcomes in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed patients in prolonged weaning at Thoraxklinik Heidelberg from 1 December 2008 to 31 December 2023. We classified three groups: ≤64, 65-79 and ≥80 years of age. The patients' characteristics and weaning success, as well as weaning failure (continued invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death), were analysed using group comparisons and logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 915 patients (64.9±13.7 years, 39.3% female) underwent prolonged weaning. 73.3% were successfully weaned, 20.2% were discharged with IMV and 6.6% died. 40.5% of the patients were ≤64 years, 49.7% were 65-79 years and 9.7% were ≥80 years old. There was a significant difference in weaning success: in the group ≤64 years the success rate was 79.0%, 65-79 years 70.3% and ≥80 years 64.0%, p=0002. The patients' characteristics differ in the age groups, with more postoperative patients, delirium and cardiovascular comorbidities and less neuromuscular disease and malignancy in ≥80 years old patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>64% of carefully selected patients ≥80 years of age could be successfully weaned in a specialised centre instead of being discharged from a general intensive care unit with continuing IMV in an outpatient intensive care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older age has been identified in many studies as a predictor of poor outcomes in intensive care, including weaning failure. Age is a risk factor for prolonged weaning, resulting in an increased number of geriatric patients being referred to specialist weaning centres. The aim of our analysis was to investigate weaning outcomes in different age groups.

Methods: We analysed patients in prolonged weaning at Thoraxklinik Heidelberg from 1 December 2008 to 31 December 2023. We classified three groups: ≤64, 65-79 and ≥80 years of age. The patients' characteristics and weaning success, as well as weaning failure (continued invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death), were analysed using group comparisons and logistic regression analyses.

Results: During the study period, 915 patients (64.9±13.7 years, 39.3% female) underwent prolonged weaning. 73.3% were successfully weaned, 20.2% were discharged with IMV and 6.6% died. 40.5% of the patients were ≤64 years, 49.7% were 65-79 years and 9.7% were ≥80 years old. There was a significant difference in weaning success: in the group ≤64 years the success rate was 79.0%, 65-79 years 70.3% and ≥80 years 64.0%, p=0002. The patients' characteristics differ in the age groups, with more postoperative patients, delirium and cardiovascular comorbidities and less neuromuscular disease and malignancy in ≥80 years old patients.

Conclusions: 64% of carefully selected patients ≥80 years of age could be successfully weaned in a specialised centre instead of being discharged from a general intensive care unit with continuing IMV in an outpatient intensive care setting.

年龄对机械通气延长脱机结局的影响。
背景:在许多研究中,年龄较大已被确定为重症监护不良结果的预测因子,包括断奶失败。年龄是延长断奶时间的一个危险因素,导致越来越多的老年患者被转介到专科断奶中心。我们分析的目的是调查不同年龄组的断奶结果。方法:我们分析了2008年12月1日至2023年12月31日在海德堡thoraxklink延长脱机的患者。我们将患者分为≤64岁、65-79岁和≥80岁三组。采用组间比较和logistic回归分析分析患者的特征和脱机成功率,以及脱机失败(持续有创机械通气(IMV)和死亡)。结果:在研究期间,915例患者(64.9±13.7岁,女性39.3%)延长了断奶时间。73.3%成功断奶,20.2%出院,6.6%死亡。40.5%的患者年龄≤64岁,49.7%的患者年龄在65 ~ 79岁,9.7%的患者年龄≥80岁。断奶成功率差异有统计学意义:≤64岁组为79.0%,65 ~ 79岁组为70.3%,≥80岁组为64.0%,p=0002。不同年龄组患者特点不同,≥80岁患者术后谵妄、心血管合并症较多,神经肌肉疾病和恶性肿瘤较少。结论:在精心挑选的≥80岁的患者中,有64%可以在专门中心成功断奶,而不是从普通重症监护病房出院,在门诊重症监护环境中继续进行IMV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信