Effect of Position Change After Induction of Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine on Duration of Analgesia and Opioid Demand in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Candidates.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.5812/aapm-153617
Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Masoud Forouzmehr
{"title":"Effect of Position Change After Induction of Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine on Duration of Analgesia and Opioid Demand in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Candidates.","authors":"Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Masoud Forouzmehr","doi":"10.5812/aapm-153617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-induction positioning influences the onset speed of the sensory block by affecting anesthetic distribution. Techniques such as using opioids and extending recovery stays aim to enhance this process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of transitioning patients from a sitting to a lateral position immediately after the induction of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under spinal anesthesia at Shahid Labafinejad Hospital in 2023 were divided into intervention (lateral position) and control (supine position) groups. Blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate were recorded upon entering recovery, then every 10 minutes up to 60 minutes, and every 15 minutes up to 120 minutes post-operation. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at specified intervals. Patient satisfaction with analgesia quality was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 35 patients in the lateral group and 34 in the supine group. Pain levels significantly differed between the groups over time (P = 0.0001). The lateral group had a longer analgesia duration (28.8 ± 10.0 minutes vs. 22.9 ± 2.9 minutes, P = 0.105) and lower total narcotic consumption (21.7 ± 5.8 mg vs. 30.4 ± 10.2 mg, P = 0.012). Mean arterial pressure changes showed no significant difference (P = 0.061). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the lateral group (P = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transitioning from the sitting to lateral position post-induction with hyperbaric bupivacaine enhances hemodynamic stability, improves drug distribution in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and enhances sensory block quality. This approach increases postoperative analgesia duration, reduces opioid use and related complications, and decreases the duration of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e153617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-153617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-induction positioning influences the onset speed of the sensory block by affecting anesthetic distribution. Techniques such as using opioids and extending recovery stays aim to enhance this process.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of transitioning patients from a sitting to a lateral position immediately after the induction of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under spinal anesthesia at Shahid Labafinejad Hospital in 2023 were divided into intervention (lateral position) and control (supine position) groups. Blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate were recorded upon entering recovery, then every 10 minutes up to 60 minutes, and every 15 minutes up to 120 minutes post-operation. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at specified intervals. Patient satisfaction with analgesia quality was also evaluated.

Results: The study included 35 patients in the lateral group and 34 in the supine group. Pain levels significantly differed between the groups over time (P = 0.0001). The lateral group had a longer analgesia duration (28.8 ± 10.0 minutes vs. 22.9 ± 2.9 minutes, P = 0.105) and lower total narcotic consumption (21.7 ± 5.8 mg vs. 30.4 ± 10.2 mg, P = 0.012). Mean arterial pressure changes showed no significant difference (P = 0.061). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the lateral group (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Transitioning from the sitting to lateral position post-induction with hyperbaric bupivacaine enhances hemodynamic stability, improves drug distribution in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and enhances sensory block quality. This approach increases postoperative analgesia duration, reduces opioid use and related complications, and decreases the duration of surgery.

Abstract Image

0.5%高压布比卡因诱导腰麻后体位变化对经皮肾镜手术患者镇痛时间和阿片类药物需求的影响。
背景:诱导后定位通过影响麻醉分布影响感觉阻滞的发生速度。使用阿片类药物和延长恢复期等技术旨在加强这一过程。目的:本研究旨在评估0.5%布比卡因高压脊髓麻醉诱导后,患者从坐位立即转变为侧卧位对术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的影响。方法:本前瞻性随机临床试验将于2023年在Shahid Labafinejad医院行脊髓麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的患者分为干预组(侧卧位)和对照组(仰卧位)。术后每10分钟至60分钟记录一次血压、平均动脉压(MAP)和心率,每15分钟至120分钟记录一次心率。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)每隔一段时间评估疼痛程度。同时评价患者对镇痛质量的满意度。结果:侧卧组35例,仰卧组34例。两组间疼痛程度随时间变化差异显著(P = 0.0001)。侧卧组镇痛时间较长(28.8±10.0 min∶22.9±2.9 min, P = 0.105),总麻醉用量较低(21.7±5.8 mg∶30.4±10.2 mg, P = 0.012)。平均动脉压变化差异无统计学意义(P = 0.061)。侧卧组患者满意度显著高于侧卧组(P = 0.0001)。结论:高压布比卡因诱导后由坐位过渡到侧卧位可增强血流动力学稳定性,改善药物在脑脊液(CSF)中的分布,增强感觉阻滞质量。这种方法增加了术后镇痛时间,减少了阿片类药物的使用和相关并发症,并缩短了手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信