Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.5812/aapm-156833
Rabab Mohamed Mohamed, Ashraf Elsayed Elgahrib Abdalla, Mohsen M Eissa, Reda Khalil Abdelrahman, Mohamed Galal Flefel, Asmaa Abdelbadie, Jehan Mohammad Ezzat Hamed Darwish
{"title":"Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy.","authors":"Rabab Mohamed Mohamed, Ashraf Elsayed Elgahrib Abdalla, Mohsen M Eissa, Reda Khalil Abdelrahman, Mohamed Galal Flefel, Asmaa Abdelbadie, Jehan Mohammad Ezzat Hamed Darwish","doi":"10.5812/aapm-156833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol is commonly used for sedation during colonoscopy but often requires high doses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the outcomes of propofol alone versus propofol combined with clonidine for colonoscopy sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 60 adult patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) received propofol alone, while group 2 (G2) received propofol plus 2 μg/kg clonidine intravenously over 10 minutes. Propofol infusion was initiated at 25 - 75 μg/kg/min IV for the first 10 - 15 minutes, then titrated to 25 - 50 μg/kg/min based on clinical response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sedation onset was significantly faster in G2 than in G1 (P = 0.001). The total propofol requirement was 22% lower in G2 (P = 0.001). Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly lower in G2 at induction and at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were higher in G2 (P = 0.042). The observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score after induction was lower in G2 (P = 0.015), indicating deeper sedation. However, Aldrete scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were lower in G2 (P = 0.001), suggesting a slower recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of clonidine to propofol for colonoscopy sedation led to faster sedation onset, reduced propofol requirements, improved patient satisfaction, and deeper sedation, but with potentially prolonged recovery times.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e156833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-156833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Propofol is commonly used for sedation during colonoscopy but often requires high doses.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of propofol alone versus propofol combined with clonidine for colonoscopy sedation.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 60 adult patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) received propofol alone, while group 2 (G2) received propofol plus 2 μg/kg clonidine intravenously over 10 minutes. Propofol infusion was initiated at 25 - 75 μg/kg/min IV for the first 10 - 15 minutes, then titrated to 25 - 50 μg/kg/min based on clinical response.

Results: Sedation onset was significantly faster in G2 than in G1 (P = 0.001). The total propofol requirement was 22% lower in G2 (P = 0.001). Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly lower in G2 at induction and at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were higher in G2 (P = 0.042). The observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score after induction was lower in G2 (P = 0.015), indicating deeper sedation. However, Aldrete scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were lower in G2 (P = 0.001), suggesting a slower recovery.

Conclusions: The addition of clonidine to propofol for colonoscopy sedation led to faster sedation onset, reduced propofol requirements, improved patient satisfaction, and deeper sedation, but with potentially prolonged recovery times.

可乐定用于结肠镜检查异丙酚镇静的附加效应。
背景:异丙酚常用于结肠镜检查时的镇静,但通常需要大剂量。目的:本研究旨在比较丙泊酚单用与丙泊酚联合可乐定用于结肠镜镇静的效果。方法:在这项随机、双盲对照试验中,纳入60例计划择期结肠镜检查的成年患者。将患者分为两组:1组(G1)单独给予异丙酚,2组(G2)给予异丙酚加可乐定2 μg/kg静脉滴注10分钟。异丙酚静脉滴注剂量为25 ~ 75 μg/kg/min,滴注前10 ~ 15分钟,根据临床反应逐渐调至25 ~ 50 μg/kg/min。结果:G2组镇静起效明显快于G1组(P = 0.001)。G2组丙泊酚总需用量降低22% (P = 0.001)。诱导时和结束时,G2组心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)均显著降低(P < 0.05)。患者满意度评分在G2组较高(P = 0.042)。诱导后观察者的警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)评分G2较低(P = 0.015),提示镇静程度较深。然而,麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的Aldrete评分在G2组较低(P = 0.001),表明恢复较慢。结论:在异丙酚中加入可乐定用于结肠镜镇静可使镇静起效更快,减少异丙酚的需用,提高患者满意度,加深镇静,但可能延长恢复时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信