Perceptions of Directive and Nondirective Therapy Statements

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Olivia G. Glasgow, Jeffrey S. Berman
{"title":"Perceptions of Directive and Nondirective Therapy Statements","authors":"Olivia G. Glasgow,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Berman","doi":"10.1002/capr.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Therapist communication style is one of many factors that may influence the outcome of psychotherapy. Some published research exists on the influence of whether the therapist is using a more or less directive form of speech; however, much of what is available is outdated. The present study assesses directive and nondirective therapist responses to recordings of client concerns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were randomly assigned to view two stimuli including the different therapist response types and were then asked to rate the therapists on perceived empathy and skill. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to assess differences between perceptions of directive and nondirective therapist responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicate that male therapists using directive statements were perceived as more skillful and empathic than those using nondirective statements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of the current study encourage male therapists to utilise directive statements when discussing client concerns, such as providing skill suggestions or therapy homework.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Therapist communication style is one of many factors that may influence the outcome of psychotherapy. Some published research exists on the influence of whether the therapist is using a more or less directive form of speech; however, much of what is available is outdated. The present study assesses directive and nondirective therapist responses to recordings of client concerns.

Method

Participants were randomly assigned to view two stimuli including the different therapist response types and were then asked to rate the therapists on perceived empathy and skill. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to assess differences between perceptions of directive and nondirective therapist responses.

Results

The results indicate that male therapists using directive statements were perceived as more skillful and empathic than those using nondirective statements.

Conclusion

The findings of the current study encourage male therapists to utilise directive statements when discussing client concerns, such as providing skill suggestions or therapy homework.

指导性和非指导性治疗陈述的认知
治疗师的沟通方式是影响心理治疗效果的众多因素之一。一些已发表的研究是关于治疗师是否使用指导性语言的影响;然而,很多可用的东西都过时了。本研究评估指令性和非指令性治疗师对来访者关注记录的反应。方法被试被随机分配观看两种刺激,包括不同的治疗师反应类型,然后被要求对治疗师的共情感知和技能进行评分。一项重复测量的方差分析被用来评估指导性和非指导性治疗师反应的感知差异。结果使用指导性陈述的男性治疗师被认为比使用非指导性陈述的男性治疗师更有技巧和共情能力。目前的研究结果鼓励男性治疗师在讨论来访者关注的问题时使用指导性陈述,例如提供技能建议或治疗作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信