SpikeNAS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Spiking Neural Network Architecture

Gengchen Sun;Zhengkun Liu;Lin Gan;Hang Su;Ting Li;Wenfeng Zhao;Biao Sun
{"title":"SpikeNAS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Spiking Neural Network Architecture","authors":"Gengchen Sun;Zhengkun Liu;Lin Gan;Hang Su;Ting Li;Wenfeng Zhao;Biao Sun","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2025.3534136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, neural architecture search (NAS) has marked significant advancements, yet its efficacy is marred by the dependence on substantial computational resources. To mitigate this, the development of NAS benchmarks has emerged, offering datasets that enumerate all potential network architectures and their performances within a predefined search space. Nonetheless, these benchmarks predominantly focus on convolutional architectures, which are criticized for their limited interpretability and suboptimal hardware efficiency. Recognizing the untapped potential of spiking neural networks (SNNs)—often hailed as the third generation of neural networks due to their biological realism and computational thrift—this study introduces SpikeNAS-Bench. As a pioneering benchmark for SNN, SpikeNAS-Bench utilizes a cell-based search space, integrating leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with variable thresholds as candidate operations. It encompasses 15 625 candidate architectures, rigorously evaluated on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and Tiny-ImageNet datasets. This article delves into the architectural nuances of SpikeNAS-Bench, leveraging various criteria to underscore the benchmark's utility and presenting insights that could steer future NAS algorithm designs. Moreover, we assess the benchmark's consistency through three distinct proxy types: zero-cost-based, early-stop-based, and predictor-based proxies. Additionally, the article benchmarks seven contemporary NAS algorithms to attest to SpikeNAS-Bench's broad applicability. We commit to providing training logs, diagnostic data for all candidate architectures, and we promise to release all code and datasets postacceptance, aiming to catalyze further exploration and innovation within the SNN domain.","PeriodicalId":73305,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","volume":"6 6","pages":"1614-1625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10855683/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, neural architecture search (NAS) has marked significant advancements, yet its efficacy is marred by the dependence on substantial computational resources. To mitigate this, the development of NAS benchmarks has emerged, offering datasets that enumerate all potential network architectures and their performances within a predefined search space. Nonetheless, these benchmarks predominantly focus on convolutional architectures, which are criticized for their limited interpretability and suboptimal hardware efficiency. Recognizing the untapped potential of spiking neural networks (SNNs)—often hailed as the third generation of neural networks due to their biological realism and computational thrift—this study introduces SpikeNAS-Bench. As a pioneering benchmark for SNN, SpikeNAS-Bench utilizes a cell-based search space, integrating leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with variable thresholds as candidate operations. It encompasses 15 625 candidate architectures, rigorously evaluated on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and Tiny-ImageNet datasets. This article delves into the architectural nuances of SpikeNAS-Bench, leveraging various criteria to underscore the benchmark's utility and presenting insights that could steer future NAS algorithm designs. Moreover, we assess the benchmark's consistency through three distinct proxy types: zero-cost-based, early-stop-based, and predictor-based proxies. Additionally, the article benchmarks seven contemporary NAS algorithms to attest to SpikeNAS-Bench's broad applicability. We commit to providing training logs, diagnostic data for all candidate architectures, and we promise to release all code and datasets postacceptance, aiming to catalyze further exploration and innovation within the SNN domain.
SpikeNAS-Bench:对峰值神经网络架构的NAS算法进行基准测试
近年来,神经结构搜索(neural architecture search, NAS)取得了显著的进步,但对大量计算资源的依赖影响了其有效性。为了缓解这种情况,NAS基准测试的开发已经出现,提供了在预定义的搜索空间内列举所有潜在网络架构及其性能的数据集。尽管如此,这些基准测试主要关注卷积架构,这些架构因其有限的可解释性和次优的硬件效率而受到批评。由于认识到峰值神经网络(snn)未开发的潜力,本研究引入了SpikeNAS-Bench。snn通常被誉为第三代神经网络,因为它们具有生物现实性和计算节俭性。作为SNN的先驱基准,SpikeNAS-Bench利用基于细胞的搜索空间,集成具有可变阈值的泄漏集成和激活神经元作为候选操作。它包含15625个候选架构,在CIFAR10、CIFAR100和Tiny-ImageNet数据集上进行了严格的评估。本文深入研究了SpikeNAS-Bench架构上的细微差别,利用各种标准来强调基准测试的实用性,并提出了可以指导未来NAS算法设计的见解。此外,我们通过三种不同的代理类型评估基准的一致性:基于零成本的代理、基于早期停止的代理和基于预测器的代理。此外,本文还对七种当代NAS算法进行了基准测试,以证明SpikeNAS-Bench的广泛适用性。我们承诺为所有候选架构提供训练日志和诊断数据,并承诺在接受后发布所有代码和数据集,旨在促进SNN领域的进一步探索和创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信