Transitioning towards standardised circular economy assessments; application to high-value production from OFMSW biogas

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
D. Renfrew , V. Vasilaki , G.A. Tsalidis , V. Perez , S Danishvar , F. Perez , Buch C. González , R. Muñoz , E. Katsou
{"title":"Transitioning towards standardised circular economy assessments; application to high-value production from OFMSW biogas","authors":"D. Renfrew ,&nbsp;V. Vasilaki ,&nbsp;G.A. Tsalidis ,&nbsp;V. Perez ,&nbsp;S Danishvar ,&nbsp;F. Perez ,&nbsp;Buch C. González ,&nbsp;R. Muñoz ,&nbsp;E. Katsou","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Publication of the European Green Deal, and subsequent Circular Economy Action Plan, establishes improving resource circularity as a key pillar of Europe’s sustainable development plan. However, a higher degree of circularity does not automatically result in a more sustainable economy, meaning the newly published ISO59020 for circularity performance measurement and assessment demands the completion of complementary sustainability analysis to support decision making. Therefore, this work aims to complete a holistic circularity assessment in line with ISO59020, by assessing both conventional and novel production processes of a high value cosmetic ingredient, that has potential to be generated from waste-derived biogas. This was achieved by applying standardised methods for circularity and environmental (life cycle assessment), economic (technoeconomic assessment), and social (social life cycle assessment) sustainability assessment. The novel process performed poorly in terms of water and emissions circularity, meaning investments are required for water upgrading and recycling technologies, and that CO<sub>2</sub> emissions should be recirculated to the biogas generation plant. However, even though the process performed well across sustainability dimensions, it was clear the process was vulnerable to performance deterioration if circularity and sustainability assessment results were considered independently. Specifically, the impacts of local water usage and grid electricity did not impact sustainability performance, whilst circularity indicators showed reliance on large freshwater demands and highly renewable grid electricity to maintain performance. Therefore, the need for harmonised assessments of circularity and sustainability is clear, and further work is needed to develop robust tools for combining impact indicators into a single, easily utilised metric.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108427"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Publication of the European Green Deal, and subsequent Circular Economy Action Plan, establishes improving resource circularity as a key pillar of Europe’s sustainable development plan. However, a higher degree of circularity does not automatically result in a more sustainable economy, meaning the newly published ISO59020 for circularity performance measurement and assessment demands the completion of complementary sustainability analysis to support decision making. Therefore, this work aims to complete a holistic circularity assessment in line with ISO59020, by assessing both conventional and novel production processes of a high value cosmetic ingredient, that has potential to be generated from waste-derived biogas. This was achieved by applying standardised methods for circularity and environmental (life cycle assessment), economic (technoeconomic assessment), and social (social life cycle assessment) sustainability assessment. The novel process performed poorly in terms of water and emissions circularity, meaning investments are required for water upgrading and recycling technologies, and that CO2 emissions should be recirculated to the biogas generation plant. However, even though the process performed well across sustainability dimensions, it was clear the process was vulnerable to performance deterioration if circularity and sustainability assessment results were considered independently. Specifically, the impacts of local water usage and grid electricity did not impact sustainability performance, whilst circularity indicators showed reliance on large freshwater demands and highly renewable grid electricity to maintain performance. Therefore, the need for harmonised assessments of circularity and sustainability is clear, and further work is needed to develop robust tools for combining impact indicators into a single, easily utilised metric.
向标准化循环经济评估过渡;应用于固体废物沼气的高价值生产
《欧洲绿色协议》和随后的《循环经济行动计划》的发布,将改善资源循环作为欧洲可持续发展计划的关键支柱。然而,更高的循环度并不会自动导致更可持续的经济,这意味着新发布的ISO59020循环性能测量和评估要求完成补充的可持续性分析,以支持决策。因此,这项工作旨在通过评估一种高价值化妆品成分的传统和新型生产工艺,完成符合ISO59020的整体循环评估,这种高价值化妆品成分有可能从废物衍生的沼气中产生。这是通过应用循环和环境(生命周期评估)、经济(技术经济评估)和社会(社会生命周期评估)可持续性评估的标准化方法实现的。这种新工艺在水和排放循环方面表现不佳,这意味着需要对水的升级和循环利用技术进行投资,而且二氧化碳排放应该再循环到沼气发电厂。然而,尽管该过程在可持续性各方面表现良好,但如果单独考虑循环性和可持续性评估结果,显然该过程容易受到绩效恶化的影响。具体而言,当地用水和电网电力的影响不影响可持续性绩效,而循环指标显示依赖于大量淡水需求和高度可再生的电网电力来维持绩效。因此,对循环性和可持续性进行统一评估的必要性是明确的,需要进一步开展工作,开发强有力的工具,将影响指标合并为一个易于使用的单一指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信