The consensus and dissent model in the graph model for conflict resolution with interval fuzzy preferences with application to doctor-patient disputes

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Dayong Wang , Yejun Xu
{"title":"The consensus and dissent model in the graph model for conflict resolution with interval fuzzy preferences with application to doctor-patient disputes","authors":"Dayong Wang ,&nbsp;Yejun Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategic conflicts, such as doctor–patient disputes, have become a major societal concern, with increased media attention exacerbating tensions among stakeholders. A key challenge in such conflicts is information asymmetry, which leads to uncertainty in the expression of decision-maker (DM) preferences. Existing consensus models in conflict analysis typically assume clear and consistent DM preferences, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios characterized by ambiguity and complexity. Thus, within the framework of the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), this paper first attempts to characterize DM’s uncertainty and resolve conflicts by considering interval fuzzy consensus and dissent preference between two DMs. The innovation of this work lies in promoting the research of consensus and dissent model in GMCR in uncertain fields. Specifically, the first work reflects the DM’s real judgments over states using interval fuzzy scales and then converts them into clear values, which can be applied to conflict analysis process. More importantly, the logical stability definitions and matrix stability definitions of the consensus and dissent model in the GMCR framework under interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) for two DMs are determined. In addition, we introduce the specific solving and analysis steps for resolving real life conflicts by using proposed models. Compared to existing consensus models in conflict decision-making with crisp preferences, DM’s IFPRs in new proposed GMCR provides a new way to characterize DM’s uncertainty and constructs a set of stability definitions in uncertainty decision making situations. Finally, in order to illustrate the correctness and scientificity of the new proposed GMCR model, it is applied to real-life doctor-patient disputes in China. The model’s validity and applicability are demonstrated through a case study of doctor–patient disputes in China, with the stability analysis offering practical insights for conflict resolution in uncertain environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 113392"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494625007033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategic conflicts, such as doctor–patient disputes, have become a major societal concern, with increased media attention exacerbating tensions among stakeholders. A key challenge in such conflicts is information asymmetry, which leads to uncertainty in the expression of decision-maker (DM) preferences. Existing consensus models in conflict analysis typically assume clear and consistent DM preferences, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios characterized by ambiguity and complexity. Thus, within the framework of the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), this paper first attempts to characterize DM’s uncertainty and resolve conflicts by considering interval fuzzy consensus and dissent preference between two DMs. The innovation of this work lies in promoting the research of consensus and dissent model in GMCR in uncertain fields. Specifically, the first work reflects the DM’s real judgments over states using interval fuzzy scales and then converts them into clear values, which can be applied to conflict analysis process. More importantly, the logical stability definitions and matrix stability definitions of the consensus and dissent model in the GMCR framework under interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) for two DMs are determined. In addition, we introduce the specific solving and analysis steps for resolving real life conflicts by using proposed models. Compared to existing consensus models in conflict decision-making with crisp preferences, DM’s IFPRs in new proposed GMCR provides a new way to characterize DM’s uncertainty and constructs a set of stability definitions in uncertainty decision making situations. Finally, in order to illustrate the correctness and scientificity of the new proposed GMCR model, it is applied to real-life doctor-patient disputes in China. The model’s validity and applicability are demonstrated through a case study of doctor–patient disputes in China, with the stability analysis offering practical insights for conflict resolution in uncertain environments.
区间模糊偏好冲突解决图模型中的共识与异议模型及其在医患纠纷中的应用
战略冲突,如医患纠纷,已成为一个主要的社会问题,媒体的日益关注加剧了利益相关者之间的紧张关系。这种冲突的一个关键挑战是信息不对称,它导致决策者偏好表达的不确定性。冲突分析中现有的共识模型通常假设了明确一致的决策偏好,限制了它们在具有模糊性和复杂性的现实场景中的适用性。因此,本文首先尝试在冲突解决图模型(GMCR)框架内,通过考虑区间模糊共识和异议偏好来表征决策决策的不确定性并解决冲突。本文的创新之处在于推动了不确定领域中GMCR共识与异议模型的研究。具体来说,第一项工作是用区间模糊尺度反映决策人对状态的真实判断,然后将其转化为清晰的值,用于冲突分析过程。更重要的是,确定了区间模糊偏好关系(IFPRs)下GMCR框架中共识与异议模型的逻辑稳定性定义和矩阵稳定性定义。此外,我们还介绍了使用所提出的模型来解决现实生活中的冲突的具体求解和分析步骤。与现有的具有明确偏好的冲突决策共识模型相比,新提出的GMCR中的决策ifpr提供了一种新的方法来表征决策的不确定性,并构建了一套不确定性决策情景下的稳定性定义。最后,为了说明新提出的GMCR模型的正确性和科学性,将其应用于中国现实生活中的医患纠纷。通过对中国医患纠纷的案例研究,验证了模型的有效性和适用性,稳定性分析为不确定环境下的冲突解决提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信