Does the Hawthorne effect influence gait assessment in stroke patients?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Wieneke van Oorschot , Michelle van Mierlo , Jean Ormiston , Noël Keijsers , Jorik Nonnekes
{"title":"Does the Hawthorne effect influence gait assessment in stroke patients?","authors":"Wieneke van Oorschot ,&nbsp;Michelle van Mierlo ,&nbsp;Jean Ormiston ,&nbsp;Noël Keijsers ,&nbsp;Jorik Nonnekes","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gait assessments are essential in post-stroke rehabilitation to quantify impairments, identify underlying causes, and guide treatment. Gait assessments may, however, be influenced by the “Hawthorne effect”, the phenomenon of behavioral change in response to observation<em>.</em> This has not been studied properly in people post-stroke. This study examined the Hawthorne effect during post-stroke gait assessment, distinguishing between observation only and observation plus awareness of gait measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty adults post-stroke walked during three gait conditions: unobserved walking, walking while being observed, and walking with observation plus awareness of gait measurement. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were collected using inertial measurement units. Primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were stride length, stride time, stride time variance and stance time symmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in gait speed<em>,</em> stride length, and stride time. Post-hoc tests showed that observation plus awareness of measurement led to higher gait speed (p = 0.004, diff=0.05 m/s) and stride length (p = 0.010, diff=0.03 m), and shorter stride time (p = 0.020, diff=-0.03 s) compared to unobserved walking. Gait speed was also higher (p = 0.004, diff=0.03 m/s) and stride time was also shorter (p = 0.040, diff=-0.02 s) in the observed plus measured condition compared to the observed condition. No significant differences were found between the observed and unobserved condition, or for stride time variance and stance time symmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While observation plus awareness of gait measurement significantly influenced gait parameters post-stroke, changes were small and did not exceed the minimal clinical important differences. Thus, the Hawthorne effect is unlikely to influence clinical decision-making during post-stroke gait assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 190-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gait assessments are essential in post-stroke rehabilitation to quantify impairments, identify underlying causes, and guide treatment. Gait assessments may, however, be influenced by the “Hawthorne effect”, the phenomenon of behavioral change in response to observation. This has not been studied properly in people post-stroke. This study examined the Hawthorne effect during post-stroke gait assessment, distinguishing between observation only and observation plus awareness of gait measurement.

Methods

Twenty adults post-stroke walked during three gait conditions: unobserved walking, walking while being observed, and walking with observation plus awareness of gait measurement. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were collected using inertial measurement units. Primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were stride length, stride time, stride time variance and stance time symmetry.

Results

A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in gait speed, stride length, and stride time. Post-hoc tests showed that observation plus awareness of measurement led to higher gait speed (p = 0.004, diff=0.05 m/s) and stride length (p = 0.010, diff=0.03 m), and shorter stride time (p = 0.020, diff=-0.03 s) compared to unobserved walking. Gait speed was also higher (p = 0.004, diff=0.03 m/s) and stride time was also shorter (p = 0.040, diff=-0.02 s) in the observed plus measured condition compared to the observed condition. No significant differences were found between the observed and unobserved condition, or for stride time variance and stance time symmetry.

Conclusion

While observation plus awareness of gait measurement significantly influenced gait parameters post-stroke, changes were small and did not exceed the minimal clinical important differences. Thus, the Hawthorne effect is unlikely to influence clinical decision-making during post-stroke gait assessment.
霍桑效应是否影响脑卒中患者的步态评估?
步态评估在卒中后康复中对量化损伤、确定潜在原因和指导治疗至关重要。然而,步态评估可能受到“霍桑效应”(Hawthorne effect)的影响,即对观察做出反应的行为改变现象。这在中风后的人群中还没有得到适当的研究。本研究考察了脑卒中后步态评估中的霍桑效应,区分了仅观察和观察加意识的步态测量。方法20例成人脑卒中后步行,分为三种步态:不被观察的步行、被观察的步行和观察加步态测量意识的步行。采用惯性测量单元采集步态时空参数。主要终点是步态速度。次要指标为步幅、步幅时间、步幅时间方差和站姿时间对称性。结果重复测量方差分析显示,两组患者在步速、步长和步幅时间上存在显著差异。事后测试显示,观察测量+意识导致更高的步态速度(p = 0.004,差异= 0.05 m / s)和步幅(p = 0.010,差异= 0.03 m),和跨步时间短(p = 0.020,差异= -0.03 s)而未被注意的行走。与观察组相比,观察加测量组的步态速度更快(p = 0.004,diff=0.03 m/s),步幅时间也更短(p = 0.040,diff=-0.02 s)。在观察和未观察条件之间,或在步幅时间方差和姿态时间对称性之间,没有发现显著差异。结论观察加步态测量意识对卒中后步态参数有显著影响,但变化不大,不超过最小的临床重要差异。因此,霍桑效应不太可能影响中风后步态评估的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信