Wieneke van Oorschot , Michelle van Mierlo , Jean Ormiston , Noël Keijsers , Jorik Nonnekes
{"title":"Does the Hawthorne effect influence gait assessment in stroke patients?","authors":"Wieneke van Oorschot , Michelle van Mierlo , Jean Ormiston , Noël Keijsers , Jorik Nonnekes","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gait assessments are essential in post-stroke rehabilitation to quantify impairments, identify underlying causes, and guide treatment. Gait assessments may, however, be influenced by the “Hawthorne effect”, the phenomenon of behavioral change in response to observation<em>.</em> This has not been studied properly in people post-stroke. This study examined the Hawthorne effect during post-stroke gait assessment, distinguishing between observation only and observation plus awareness of gait measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty adults post-stroke walked during three gait conditions: unobserved walking, walking while being observed, and walking with observation plus awareness of gait measurement. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were collected using inertial measurement units. Primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were stride length, stride time, stride time variance and stance time symmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in gait speed<em>,</em> stride length, and stride time. Post-hoc tests showed that observation plus awareness of measurement led to higher gait speed (p = 0.004, diff=0.05 m/s) and stride length (p = 0.010, diff=0.03 m), and shorter stride time (p = 0.020, diff=-0.03 s) compared to unobserved walking. Gait speed was also higher (p = 0.004, diff=0.03 m/s) and stride time was also shorter (p = 0.040, diff=-0.02 s) in the observed plus measured condition compared to the observed condition. No significant differences were found between the observed and unobserved condition, or for stride time variance and stance time symmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While observation plus awareness of gait measurement significantly influenced gait parameters post-stroke, changes were small and did not exceed the minimal clinical important differences. Thus, the Hawthorne effect is unlikely to influence clinical decision-making during post-stroke gait assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 190-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Gait assessments are essential in post-stroke rehabilitation to quantify impairments, identify underlying causes, and guide treatment. Gait assessments may, however, be influenced by the “Hawthorne effect”, the phenomenon of behavioral change in response to observation. This has not been studied properly in people post-stroke. This study examined the Hawthorne effect during post-stroke gait assessment, distinguishing between observation only and observation plus awareness of gait measurement.
Methods
Twenty adults post-stroke walked during three gait conditions: unobserved walking, walking while being observed, and walking with observation plus awareness of gait measurement. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were collected using inertial measurement units. Primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were stride length, stride time, stride time variance and stance time symmetry.
Results
A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in gait speed, stride length, and stride time. Post-hoc tests showed that observation plus awareness of measurement led to higher gait speed (p = 0.004, diff=0.05 m/s) and stride length (p = 0.010, diff=0.03 m), and shorter stride time (p = 0.020, diff=-0.03 s) compared to unobserved walking. Gait speed was also higher (p = 0.004, diff=0.03 m/s) and stride time was also shorter (p = 0.040, diff=-0.02 s) in the observed plus measured condition compared to the observed condition. No significant differences were found between the observed and unobserved condition, or for stride time variance and stance time symmetry.
Conclusion
While observation plus awareness of gait measurement significantly influenced gait parameters post-stroke, changes were small and did not exceed the minimal clinical important differences. Thus, the Hawthorne effect is unlikely to influence clinical decision-making during post-stroke gait assessment.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.