Association of health care policy and trends in cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Daniel L. Pelzman , Danielle Sharbaugh , Jonathan G. Yabes , Jonathan Lin , Maria Pere , Ravy Vajravelu , David Wilson , Margarita Zuley , Sarah Taylor , Benjamin J. Davies , Lindsay M. Sabik , Bruce L. Jacobs
{"title":"Association of health care policy and trends in cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Daniel L. Pelzman ,&nbsp;Danielle Sharbaugh ,&nbsp;Jonathan G. Yabes ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lin ,&nbsp;Maria Pere ,&nbsp;Ravy Vajravelu ,&nbsp;David Wilson ,&nbsp;Margarita Zuley ,&nbsp;Sarah Taylor ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Davies ,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Sabik ,&nbsp;Bruce L. Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cancer screening trends and associations with statewide containment policies during the COVID-19 pandemic are not fully understood. We sought to examine trends in screening rates for prostate, breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer from March to December 2020, and to examine whether statewide containment policies were associated with screening rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort studying using the Healthjump dataset, which comprises encounter-level data for more than 40 million patients across the United States. Individuals with at least one cancer screening test between 1/2016 and 12/2020 were included. Expected screenings during the pandemic were calculated using a seasonally-adjusted model and compared with observed values. The association with containment policies was estimated by comparing these ratios to statewide stringency indices measured by the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a negative, significant association between statewide stringency policies and observed-to-expected screening ratios for all cancers. In addition, there was a rapid decrease in the observed-to-expected screening ratios for all cancers in April 2020 followed by a rise in screening for all cancers in the latter half of 2020. Prostate, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening increased beyond expected counts, while breast cancer screening approached expected counts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More stringent statewide containment policies were negatively associated with screening rates. These rates decreased during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, but subsequently increased to normal or near-normal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125001146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cancer screening trends and associations with statewide containment policies during the COVID-19 pandemic are not fully understood. We sought to examine trends in screening rates for prostate, breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer from March to December 2020, and to examine whether statewide containment policies were associated with screening rates.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort studying using the Healthjump dataset, which comprises encounter-level data for more than 40 million patients across the United States. Individuals with at least one cancer screening test between 1/2016 and 12/2020 were included. Expected screenings during the pandemic were calculated using a seasonally-adjusted model and compared with observed values. The association with containment policies was estimated by comparing these ratios to statewide stringency indices measured by the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker.

Results

There was a negative, significant association between statewide stringency policies and observed-to-expected screening ratios for all cancers. In addition, there was a rapid decrease in the observed-to-expected screening ratios for all cancers in April 2020 followed by a rise in screening for all cancers in the latter half of 2020. Prostate, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening increased beyond expected counts, while breast cancer screening approached expected counts.

Conclusions

More stringent statewide containment policies were negatively associated with screening rates. These rates decreased during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, but subsequently increased to normal or near-normal.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的卫生保健政策和癌症筛查趋势协会
在COVID-19大流行期间,癌症筛查趋势及其与全州遏制政策的关系尚不完全清楚。我们试图研究2020年3月至12月期间前列腺癌、乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结肠癌和肺癌筛查率的趋势,并研究全州范围内的遏制政策是否与筛查率相关。方法我们使用Healthjump数据集进行了回顾性队列研究,该数据集包括美国超过4000万患者的接触水平数据。在2016年1月至2020年12月期间至少进行过一次癌症筛查的个体被纳入研究。使用季节性调整模型计算大流行期间的预期筛查,并与观测值进行比较。通过将这些比率与牛津COVID-19政府反应追踪器测量的全州严格性指数进行比较,估计了与遏制政策的关联。结果全州范围内的严格政策与所有癌症的观察到的预期筛查比率之间存在显著的负相关。此外,2020年4月,所有癌症的观察到的与预期的筛查比率迅速下降,随后在2020年下半年,所有癌症的筛查比率上升。前列腺癌、宫颈癌、结肠癌和肺癌的筛查数量超出了预期,而乳腺癌的筛查数量接近预期。结论全州范围内更严格的防控政策与筛查率呈负相关。这些比率在COVID-19大流行的早期阶段有所下降,但随后上升至正常或接近正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信