Ozden Kilinc , Jay Bharat Bisen , Anthony Maroun , Ethan Johnson , Sandra Quinn , Daniel Kim , Daniel C. Lee , Michael Markl , Bradley D. Allen
{"title":"4D Flow MRI derived aortic pulse wave velocity and wall shear stress in Covid-19","authors":"Ozden Kilinc , Jay Bharat Bisen , Anthony Maroun , Ethan Johnson , Sandra Quinn , Daniel Kim , Daniel C. Lee , Michael Markl , Bradley D. Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the changes in aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and wall shear stress (WSS) in COVID-19 using 4D Flow MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-seven COVID-19 patients and 37 healthy controls underwent thoracic cardiovascular MRI. The PWV and WSS comparisons were performed using independent <em>t</em>-test. Peak velocity (PV)-peak WSS correlations in patients; aortic dimension-regional WSS correlations; PWV-age correlations were reported using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The global aortic PWV was higher in the patient group (<em>p</em> = 0.007). There was a positive correlation between patient age and PWV values (<em>r</em> = 0.650, <em>p</em> = 0.000). The patient ascending aorta (AAo) WSS levels were lower in the entire cohort, in the subgroup of ages between 50 and 70, and in the age/gender matched subgroup (<em>p</em> < 0.05 for all). Voxelwise 5 % PV was lower in the patient group (<em>p</em> = 0.005) and showed strong correlation with the 5 % peak WSS (<em>r</em> = 0.957). In the patient group there was a negative correlation between the maximal aortic dimension and AAo WSS (<em>r</em> = −0.398, <em>p</em> = 0.014) and aortic arch WSS (<em>r</em> = −0.388, <em>p</em> = 0.017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The alterations to aortic stiffness in COVID-19 might be a late effect of the disease and should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow-ups. The reasons behind the low AAo WSS levels in the COVID-19 group appears to be multifactorial and further work in larger cohorts eliminating the baseline aortic diameter and preexisting atherosclerotic risk factor differences is needed to validate our results and to establish reproducibility of the technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 110524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712500124X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the changes in aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and wall shear stress (WSS) in COVID-19 using 4D Flow MRI.
Methods
Thirty-seven COVID-19 patients and 37 healthy controls underwent thoracic cardiovascular MRI. The PWV and WSS comparisons were performed using independent t-test. Peak velocity (PV)-peak WSS correlations in patients; aortic dimension-regional WSS correlations; PWV-age correlations were reported using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis.
Results
The global aortic PWV was higher in the patient group (p = 0.007). There was a positive correlation between patient age and PWV values (r = 0.650, p = 0.000). The patient ascending aorta (AAo) WSS levels were lower in the entire cohort, in the subgroup of ages between 50 and 70, and in the age/gender matched subgroup (p < 0.05 for all). Voxelwise 5 % PV was lower in the patient group (p = 0.005) and showed strong correlation with the 5 % peak WSS (r = 0.957). In the patient group there was a negative correlation between the maximal aortic dimension and AAo WSS (r = −0.398, p = 0.014) and aortic arch WSS (r = −0.388, p = 0.017).
Conclusion
The alterations to aortic stiffness in COVID-19 might be a late effect of the disease and should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow-ups. The reasons behind the low AAo WSS levels in the COVID-19 group appears to be multifactorial and further work in larger cohorts eliminating the baseline aortic diameter and preexisting atherosclerotic risk factor differences is needed to validate our results and to establish reproducibility of the technique.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology