Advancements in robotic-assisted spine surgery: A literature review and technology comparison

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jonathan Hammond , Stefano Priola
{"title":"Advancements in robotic-assisted spine surgery: A literature review and technology comparison","authors":"Jonathan Hammond ,&nbsp;Stefano Priola","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Since the first spinal robotic system was developed in 2004, there have been many innovations in the field of neurosurgery including new robotic systems that utilize optical tracking systems (OTS) like the Mazor X Stealth Edition. OTS is an effective navigation system with high accuracy, yet it does have certain limitations like line-of-sight obstructions. Recently, alternative technology like electromagnetic navigation has been explored to address this challenge and shown promising results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature review was completed using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect to identify all current spinal robotic systems. Information regarding 8i Robotics was obtained directly from the manufacturer based on company-reported specifications.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There are currently six spinal robotic systems available, all of which utilize OTS for navigation. One of the main challenges of this type of navigation is line of sight obstructions which can result in decreased accuracy and cause delays in time. Recent development involves the use of EM navigation which has not been done in spine surgery thus far. Since EM navigation eliminates the need for line of sight, it creates an efficient and flexible environment for the surgeon to work in. However, EM navigation is not without challenges, including electromagnetic interference from metallic objects, which can disrupt signals and decrease accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>OTS remains the gold standard in robotic spine surgery due to its proven safety and accuracy. However, EM navigation presents a promising alternative by addressing line-of-sight limitations while maintaining high accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 102056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925000684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Since the first spinal robotic system was developed in 2004, there have been many innovations in the field of neurosurgery including new robotic systems that utilize optical tracking systems (OTS) like the Mazor X Stealth Edition. OTS is an effective navigation system with high accuracy, yet it does have certain limitations like line-of-sight obstructions. Recently, alternative technology like electromagnetic navigation has been explored to address this challenge and shown promising results.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was completed using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect to identify all current spinal robotic systems. Information regarding 8i Robotics was obtained directly from the manufacturer based on company-reported specifications.

Discussion

There are currently six spinal robotic systems available, all of which utilize OTS for navigation. One of the main challenges of this type of navigation is line of sight obstructions which can result in decreased accuracy and cause delays in time. Recent development involves the use of EM navigation which has not been done in spine surgery thus far. Since EM navigation eliminates the need for line of sight, it creates an efficient and flexible environment for the surgeon to work in. However, EM navigation is not without challenges, including electromagnetic interference from metallic objects, which can disrupt signals and decrease accuracy.

Conclusion

OTS remains the gold standard in robotic spine surgery due to its proven safety and accuracy. However, EM navigation presents a promising alternative by addressing line-of-sight limitations while maintaining high accuracy.
机器人辅助脊柱手术的进展:文献综述和技术比较
自2004年开发出第一个脊柱机器人系统以来,神经外科领域出现了许多创新,包括利用光学跟踪系统(OTS)的新型机器人系统,如Mazor X隐身版。OTS是一种有效的高精度导航系统,但也存在一定的局限性,如视线障碍等。最近,人们探索了电磁导航等替代技术来解决这一挑战,并取得了可喜的成果。方法利用PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、ScienceDirect等数据库,对现有的脊柱机器人系统进行全面的文献综述。关于8i Robotics的信息是根据公司报告的规格直接从制造商处获得的。目前有六个可用的脊柱机器人系统,它们都利用OTS进行导航。这种导航的主要挑战之一是视线障碍,这可能导致精度降低并导致时间延迟。最近的发展涉及到EM导航的使用,这在脊柱手术中迄今尚未实现。由于EM导航消除了视线的需要,它为外科医生创造了一个高效灵活的工作环境。然而,电磁导航并非没有挑战,包括来自金属物体的电磁干扰,这可能会破坏信号并降低精度。结论机器人脊柱手术的安全性和准确性是机器人脊柱手术的金标准。然而,EM导航提供了一种很有前途的替代方案,可以在保持高精度的同时解决视线限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信