Tahir S. Kafil MD , Manuel L. Ribeiro Neto MD , Marc A. Judson MD , Leslie T. Cooper Jr. MD , Jordana Kron MD , Jan C. Grutters MD , David H. Birnie MD, MBChB , Ronald Witteles MD , Emer Joyce MD, PhD , Edward J. Miller MD, PhD , Amit S. Patel MD , Daniel A. Culver DO , Christine L. Jellis MD, PhD
{"title":"Global Practices in Cardiac Imaging for Cardiac Sarcoidosis","authors":"Tahir S. Kafil MD , Manuel L. Ribeiro Neto MD , Marc A. Judson MD , Leslie T. Cooper Jr. MD , Jordana Kron MD , Jan C. Grutters MD , David H. Birnie MD, MBChB , Ronald Witteles MD , Emer Joyce MD, PhD , Edward J. Miller MD, PhD , Amit S. Patel MD , Daniel A. Culver DO , Christine L. Jellis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac imaging is a cornerstone in the initial diagnosis, management, and follow-up of cardiac sarcoidosis. However, ordering thresholds, access, and follow-up imaging vary across the globe.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>A Delphi study was conducted to define areas of consensus and areas requiring further study in the use of cardiac imaging in suspected or established cardiac sarcoidosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts in cardiac sarcoidosis completed a modified 2-round Delphi study. The study evaluated clinical decision making regarding the use of cardiac imaging, including indication thresholds, interpretation, and interval follow-up imaging. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement or disagreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 89 experts in cardiac sarcoidosis (89 in round 1 and 75 in round 2) participated, representing 61 centers in 13 countries. Consensus was reached on 22 of 46 items (48%) in round 1 and 21 of 29 items (72%) in round 2. There was a low threshold to order advanced cardiac imaging for new rhythm abnormalities or ventricular dysfunction detected on echocardiography in patients with established extracardiac sarcoidosis. <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography was an important co-primary modality with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for initial diagnosis. If CMR was the first test, there was consensus to proceed to FDG–positron emission tomography after any abnormal CMR result or even after normal CMR result in the setting of moderate or high pretest probability for cardiac sarcoidosis. There was consensus that late gadolinium enhancement quantification was important, but there was no consensus on the threshold of risk or on how best to quantify late gadolinium enhancement. Similarly, reduction in FDG uptake was an important factor in guiding treatment response, but there was no consensus on how to best quantify FDG uptake or what constituted an adequate radiographic response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Several consensus areas for cardiac imaging in suspected and established cardiac sarcoidosis were identified. This consensus study identified areas of priority for future prospective, controlled, multicenter research studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":"18 6","pages":"Pages 679-692"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X25002049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cardiac imaging is a cornerstone in the initial diagnosis, management, and follow-up of cardiac sarcoidosis. However, ordering thresholds, access, and follow-up imaging vary across the globe.
Objectives
A Delphi study was conducted to define areas of consensus and areas requiring further study in the use of cardiac imaging in suspected or established cardiac sarcoidosis.
Methods
An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts in cardiac sarcoidosis completed a modified 2-round Delphi study. The study evaluated clinical decision making regarding the use of cardiac imaging, including indication thresholds, interpretation, and interval follow-up imaging. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement or disagreement.
Results
A total of 89 experts in cardiac sarcoidosis (89 in round 1 and 75 in round 2) participated, representing 61 centers in 13 countries. Consensus was reached on 22 of 46 items (48%) in round 1 and 21 of 29 items (72%) in round 2. There was a low threshold to order advanced cardiac imaging for new rhythm abnormalities or ventricular dysfunction detected on echocardiography in patients with established extracardiac sarcoidosis. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography was an important co-primary modality with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for initial diagnosis. If CMR was the first test, there was consensus to proceed to FDG–positron emission tomography after any abnormal CMR result or even after normal CMR result in the setting of moderate or high pretest probability for cardiac sarcoidosis. There was consensus that late gadolinium enhancement quantification was important, but there was no consensus on the threshold of risk or on how best to quantify late gadolinium enhancement. Similarly, reduction in FDG uptake was an important factor in guiding treatment response, but there was no consensus on how to best quantify FDG uptake or what constituted an adequate radiographic response.
Conclusions
Several consensus areas for cardiac imaging in suspected and established cardiac sarcoidosis were identified. This consensus study identified areas of priority for future prospective, controlled, multicenter research studies.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography.
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy.
In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.