How is professionalism measured in health care professions?

Anas Alnasser , Brett Williams , Cameron M Gosling
{"title":"How is professionalism measured in health care professions?","authors":"Anas Alnasser ,&nbsp;Brett Williams ,&nbsp;Cameron M Gosling","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2025.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping study aims to explore the available literature, key concepts, and strategic approaches for measuring professionalism in the health sector. The central research question is: How is professionalism evaluated across various healthcare fields?</div><div>Professionalism is essential for quality care and trust within healthcare institutions. Understanding how it is measured can enhance healthcare delivery.</div><div>This review was conducted following the JBI approach and adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</div><div>Electronic databases were systematically searched for articles published between 2005 and 2024. A total of 1,558 articles were identified, and after screening titles and abstracts, 44 papers were included for analysis.</div><div>The review revealed a diverse range of valid and reliable methods used to measure and describe professionalism in healthcare. Included studies utilized both qualitative and quantitative approaches and spanned various contexts, highlighting the adaptability and robustness of measurement techniques.</div><div>The findings underscore the critical role of professionalism in delivering quality care and fostering trust in healthcare settings. Employing multiple measurement approaches is essential for effectively assessing healthcare personnel's behaviour, ultimately enhancing trust and service quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632025000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping study aims to explore the available literature, key concepts, and strategic approaches for measuring professionalism in the health sector. The central research question is: How is professionalism evaluated across various healthcare fields?
Professionalism is essential for quality care and trust within healthcare institutions. Understanding how it is measured can enhance healthcare delivery.
This review was conducted following the JBI approach and adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Electronic databases were systematically searched for articles published between 2005 and 2024. A total of 1,558 articles were identified, and after screening titles and abstracts, 44 papers were included for analysis.
The review revealed a diverse range of valid and reliable methods used to measure and describe professionalism in healthcare. Included studies utilized both qualitative and quantitative approaches and spanned various contexts, highlighting the adaptability and robustness of measurement techniques.
The findings underscore the critical role of professionalism in delivering quality care and fostering trust in healthcare settings. Employing multiple measurement approaches is essential for effectively assessing healthcare personnel's behaviour, ultimately enhancing trust and service quality.
如何衡量卫生保健专业的专业性?
本研究旨在探讨现有文献、关键概念和衡量卫生部门专业精神的战略方法。研究的核心问题是:如何在不同的医疗保健领域评估专业精神?专业精神对于医疗机构内的优质护理和信任至关重要。了解如何衡量可以提高医疗服务质量。本综述遵循JBI方法并遵循PRISMA-ScR指南进行。电子数据库系统地检索了2005年至2024年间发表的文章。共纳入1558篇文献,经标题和摘要筛选,共纳入44篇进行分析。回顾揭示了各种有效和可靠的方法用于测量和描述在医疗保健专业。纳入的研究利用了定性和定量方法,跨越了各种背景,突出了测量技术的适应性和稳健性。研究结果强调了专业精神在提供高质量护理和促进医疗机构信任方面的关键作用。采用多种测量方法对于有效评估医护人员的行为,最终提高信任和服务质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health sciences review (Oxford, England)
Health sciences review (Oxford, England) Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信