Medha Vallurupalli , Nikhil D. Shah , Samhitha Yadalla , Raj M. Vyas
{"title":"Promoting patient health literacy in burn care through artificial intelligence language learning models: A study of text analysis and simplification","authors":"Medha Vallurupalli , Nikhil D. Shah , Samhitha Yadalla , Raj M. Vyas","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health literacy is essential in patient care, especially in burn treatment, where understanding care information can significantly influence recovery outcomes. Despite national guidelines recommending that patient education materials be written at a 6th- to 8th-grade reading level, many resources exceed this complexity, exacerbating poor health literacy and patient outcomes. This study investigates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence language learning models in simplifying patient-facing burn care information to adhere to these readability standards. Fifteen excerpts from academic institutions' burn care materials were evaluated for readability using a traditional readability calculator and four AI models: ChatGPT 4o, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI. The traditional readability calculator provided a baseline score, which was compared to the scores from the AI models. Results indicated that ChatGPT 4o and Microsoft Copilot had readability scores that were comparable to the readability scores provided by the traditional calculator. Additionally, when tasked with simplifying the texts, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI reduced the readability scores to within the desired 6th to 8th-grade level. These findings suggest that AI models, particularly Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI, can effectively simplify medical texts, making them more accessible to patients. However, clinician oversight is necessary to ensure the accuracy and appropriateness of the simplified materials, promoting better health literacy and patient outcomes in burn care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 107548"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925001779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health literacy is essential in patient care, especially in burn treatment, where understanding care information can significantly influence recovery outcomes. Despite national guidelines recommending that patient education materials be written at a 6th- to 8th-grade reading level, many resources exceed this complexity, exacerbating poor health literacy and patient outcomes. This study investigates the effectiveness of artificial intelligence language learning models in simplifying patient-facing burn care information to adhere to these readability standards. Fifteen excerpts from academic institutions' burn care materials were evaluated for readability using a traditional readability calculator and four AI models: ChatGPT 4o, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI. The traditional readability calculator provided a baseline score, which was compared to the scores from the AI models. Results indicated that ChatGPT 4o and Microsoft Copilot had readability scores that were comparable to the readability scores provided by the traditional calculator. Additionally, when tasked with simplifying the texts, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI reduced the readability scores to within the desired 6th to 8th-grade level. These findings suggest that AI models, particularly Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Meta AI, can effectively simplify medical texts, making them more accessible to patients. However, clinician oversight is necessary to ensure the accuracy and appropriateness of the simplified materials, promoting better health literacy and patient outcomes in burn care.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.