Teachers’ experiences in co-creating an implementation plan for a public health intervention: a Health CASCADE study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Janneke de Boer , Lea Rahel Delfmann , Lauren McCaffrey , Greet Cardon , Teatske Altenburg , Benedicte Deforche , Veerle Van Oeckel , Maïté Verloigne
{"title":"Teachers’ experiences in co-creating an implementation plan for a public health intervention: a Health CASCADE study","authors":"Janneke de Boer ,&nbsp;Lea Rahel Delfmann ,&nbsp;Lauren McCaffrey ,&nbsp;Greet Cardon ,&nbsp;Teatske Altenburg ,&nbsp;Benedicte Deforche ,&nbsp;Veerle Van Oeckel ,&nbsp;Maïté Verloigne","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>When co-creating school-based public health interventions, it is crucial to involve teachers alongside students as they are often deliverers of the school-based intervention (components), and fulfil a key role in the implementation of the intervention. This study investigates teachers’ experiences during the co-creation process of developing an implementation plan of a healthy sleep intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Qualitative observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experiences of teachers involved in the action group (<em>n</em> = 6) were derived from transcripts of all co-creation sessions (<em>n</em> = 6) and one semi-structured focus group. Reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) in NVivo 14 was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The co-creation process took place within the highly demanding school context, which influenced teachers' co-creation experience. Teachers preferred a guided process, to make efficient use of their time. Positive experiences were principal support, the ability to share their opinion, and decision-making power. Negative experiences were inter-role conflict, low group cohesion due to the high absence level, and lacking support of their fellow colleagues. In addition, misunderstanding the aim of the co-creation process impacted teachers’ motivation, as they expected to focus on the health problem rather than developing an implementation plan to tackle the health problem among adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Since teachers are not trained as health promotors, co-creation processes for implementing school-based public health interventions should be guided by researchers. These processes should incorporate capacity-building activities to enhance teachers’ knowledge and skills in the health topic and intervention implementation, while minimising time demands to facilitate their participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 105784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

When co-creating school-based public health interventions, it is crucial to involve teachers alongside students as they are often deliverers of the school-based intervention (components), and fulfil a key role in the implementation of the intervention. This study investigates teachers’ experiences during the co-creation process of developing an implementation plan of a healthy sleep intervention.

Study design

Qualitative observational study.

Methods

Experiences of teachers involved in the action group (n = 6) were derived from transcripts of all co-creation sessions (n = 6) and one semi-structured focus group. Reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) in NVivo 14 was performed.

Results

The co-creation process took place within the highly demanding school context, which influenced teachers' co-creation experience. Teachers preferred a guided process, to make efficient use of their time. Positive experiences were principal support, the ability to share their opinion, and decision-making power. Negative experiences were inter-role conflict, low group cohesion due to the high absence level, and lacking support of their fellow colleagues. In addition, misunderstanding the aim of the co-creation process impacted teachers’ motivation, as they expected to focus on the health problem rather than developing an implementation plan to tackle the health problem among adolescents.

Conclusions

Since teachers are not trained as health promotors, co-creation processes for implementing school-based public health interventions should be guided by researchers. These processes should incorporate capacity-building activities to enhance teachers’ knowledge and skills in the health topic and intervention implementation, while minimising time demands to facilitate their participation.
教师共同制定公共卫生干预实施计划的经验:一项健康级联研究
在共同制定校本公共卫生干预措施时,至关重要的是让教师与学生一起参与,因为他们往往是校本干预措施(组成部分)的提供者,并在实施干预措施方面发挥关键作用。本研究探讨教师在共同创作健康睡眠干预实施方案的过程中的经验。研究设计定性观察性研究。方法参与行动小组的教师(n = 6)的经验来源于所有共同创造会议(n = 6)和一个半结构化焦点小组的记录。对NVivo 14进行反身性主题分析(RTA)。结果共同创造过程发生在高要求的学校环境中,这影响了教师的共同创造体验。教师们更喜欢有指导的过程,以有效地利用他们的时间。积极的经历是主要的支持、分享意见的能力和决策权。负性体验为角色间冲突、缺勤程度高导致的团队凝聚力低、缺乏同事支持。此外,对共同创造过程的目的的误解影响了教师的动机,因为他们希望把重点放在健康问题上,而不是制定一个解决青少年健康问题的实施计划。结论由于教师没有接受过健康促进者的培训,因此实施基于学校的公共卫生干预措施的共同创造过程应由研究人员指导。这些进程应包括能力建设活动,以提高教师在保健主题和干预措施实施方面的知识和技能,同时尽量减少为促进他们参与所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信