Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Conrad Wiermann , Malin Hanne Bockwoldt , Daniel Uteau , Stephan Peth , Anneka Mordhorst , Heiner Fleige
{"title":"Present state of soil structure: A comparison of cropland and grassland soils in North Germany","authors":"Conrad Wiermann ,&nbsp;Malin Hanne Bockwoldt ,&nbsp;Daniel Uteau ,&nbsp;Stephan Peth ,&nbsp;Anneka Mordhorst ,&nbsp;Heiner Fleige","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (Müller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106681"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to analyse soil structure of representative crop (45 sites) and grassland (58 sites) soils and furthermore to identify differences in soil structure features between these sites in Northern Germany. Using the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT), published by Zink et al. (2011), the present state of soil structure was investigated. Additionally, the orientation of the pore system was analysed by combining the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Finally, the influence of soil structure features on crop yield of different arable plants was determined according to the concept of the Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (Müller et al., 2013). While (sub-) soil compaction within the transition layer, connecting top- and subsoil, was identified on 15 % of the on arable sites, on grassland sites in contrast only a negligible small proportion showed these features. Regarding the correlation of soil quality and crop yield, the results also show differences between arable and grassland sites: on arable soils a correlation was found with a coefficient of determination of nearly 50 % (R²=0.46), on grassland sites in contrast this correlation could not be identified. The conclusions of this study are the overriding importance of soil structure on arable soils regarding plant yield and management efficiency. In contrast, plant growth and yield on grassland soils are more likely determined by management practices (e.g. fertilisation, number of cuts) and the influencing groundwater than by soil structure features. Furthermore, the results show investigation methods should be adapted to grassland soils in order to analyse the complex interactions of soil, sward (including the dense rooting system) and environmental conditions.
土壤结构现状:德国北部农田和草地土壤的比较
本研究的目的是分析代表性作物(45个地点)和草地(58个地点)土壤的土壤结构,并进一步确定德国北部这些地点之间土壤结构特征的差异。利用Zink et al.(2011)出版的压实验证工具(CVT)对土壤结构现状进行了研究。此外,通过结合垂直和水平导水率分析了孔隙系统的取向。最后,根据Muencheberg土壤质量评级(m ller et al., 2013)的概念,确定土壤结构特征对不同可耕地植物作物产量的影响。在15% %的耕地场地上发现了连接表层和底土的过渡层(亚)土壤压实,相比之下,在草地场地上只有微不足道的一小部分表现出这些特征。在土壤质量与作物产量的相关性方面,结果也显示出耕地与草地之间的差异:在耕地土壤上,相关系数接近50 % (R²=0.46),而在草地上则不存在这种相关性。本研究的结论是,土壤结构对耕地土壤的植物产量和管理效率至关重要。相比之下,草地土壤上的植物生长和产量更可能取决于管理做法(如施肥、刈割次数)和影响地下水,而不是土壤结构特征。为了分析土壤、草地(包括茂密的生根系统)和环境条件之间复杂的相互作用,调查方法应适应草地土壤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信