Promoting urban air quality resilience through communication: A stakeholder needs mapping and prioritisation study informed by design thinking

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Roberto Cibin , Dean S. Venables , Marica Cassarino
{"title":"Promoting urban air quality resilience through communication: A stakeholder needs mapping and prioritisation study informed by design thinking","authors":"Roberto Cibin ,&nbsp;Dean S. Venables ,&nbsp;Marica Cassarino","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Air pollution (AP) poses significant global health risks and exacerbates socio-economic inequities, especially in urban contexts. This study mapped stakeholder needs and priorities for developing communication strategies to foster air quality (AQ) resilience, using Cork City, Ireland, as a case study. Employing a Design Thinking approach, the research involved consultations in the form of qualitative interviews and one focus group (n = 62), followed by a quantitative survey (n = 105) to prioritise identified needs. Stakeholders included, among others, residents, policymakers, health professionals, and academics. The needs assessment revealed two key areas related to enhancing communication functions, channels and formats, and addressing policy and systemic issues. Effective AQ communication must address public understanding of AP risks, empower adaptive behaviours, and mobilise civic engagement. Stakeholders emphasised the need for accessible, contextually relevant, and solution-oriented communication. Systemic needs encompassed enhancing local policies, infrastructure, and governance to support behavioural changes, such as reducing car dependence and promoting sustainable heating practices. Consultations revealed social, cultural, and infrastructural challenges to making AQ communication effective, and underscored the necessity of inclusive, participatory approaches. The need prioritisation results indicate that stakeholders value systemic improvements, such as increased urban green spaces and appropriate public transport infrastructure, alongside tailored communication strategies. This research underscores the importance of integrating communication with systemic interventions to enhance urban AQ resilience. The findings informed co-creation of actionable, equitable AQ communication strategies and contribute to broader debates on environmental sustainability and community resilience. Future work should extend participatory methodologies to diverse contexts and emphasize socio-ecological interactions for effective environmental communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air pollution (AP) poses significant global health risks and exacerbates socio-economic inequities, especially in urban contexts. This study mapped stakeholder needs and priorities for developing communication strategies to foster air quality (AQ) resilience, using Cork City, Ireland, as a case study. Employing a Design Thinking approach, the research involved consultations in the form of qualitative interviews and one focus group (n = 62), followed by a quantitative survey (n = 105) to prioritise identified needs. Stakeholders included, among others, residents, policymakers, health professionals, and academics. The needs assessment revealed two key areas related to enhancing communication functions, channels and formats, and addressing policy and systemic issues. Effective AQ communication must address public understanding of AP risks, empower adaptive behaviours, and mobilise civic engagement. Stakeholders emphasised the need for accessible, contextually relevant, and solution-oriented communication. Systemic needs encompassed enhancing local policies, infrastructure, and governance to support behavioural changes, such as reducing car dependence and promoting sustainable heating practices. Consultations revealed social, cultural, and infrastructural challenges to making AQ communication effective, and underscored the necessity of inclusive, participatory approaches. The need prioritisation results indicate that stakeholders value systemic improvements, such as increased urban green spaces and appropriate public transport infrastructure, alongside tailored communication strategies. This research underscores the importance of integrating communication with systemic interventions to enhance urban AQ resilience. The findings informed co-creation of actionable, equitable AQ communication strategies and contribute to broader debates on environmental sustainability and community resilience. Future work should extend participatory methodologies to diverse contexts and emphasize socio-ecological interactions for effective environmental communication.
通过沟通促进城市空气质量的恢复力:利益相关者需要通过设计思维进行制图和优先级研究
空气污染构成重大的全球健康风险,并加剧了社会经济不平等,尤其是在城市环境中。本研究以爱尔兰科克市为例,绘制了利益相关者在制定促进空气质量(AQ)恢复力的沟通策略方面的需求和优先事项。采用设计思维方法,研究包括以定性访谈和一个焦点小组(n = 62)的形式进行磋商,然后进行定量调查(n = 105),以确定确定的需求的优先级。除其他外,利益攸关方包括居民、政策制定者、卫生专业人员和学者。需求评估揭示了与加强沟通功能、渠道和形式以及解决政策和系统问题有关的两个关键领域。有效的空气质量沟通必须解决公众对空气质量风险的理解,增强适应性行为的能力,并动员公民参与。利益攸关方强调需要无障碍、情境相关和面向解决方案的沟通。系统性需求包括加强地方政策、基础设施和治理,以支持行为改变,如减少对汽车的依赖和促进可持续供暖实践。磋商揭示了使AQ沟通有效的社会、文化和基础设施方面的挑战,并强调了包容性、参与性方法的必要性。需求优先排序结果表明,利益相关者重视系统改进,例如增加城市绿地和适当的公共交通基础设施,以及量身定制的沟通策略。本研究强调了将沟通与系统干预相结合以增强城市AQ复原力的重要性。研究结果为共同制定可操作、公平的AQ传播战略提供了信息,并有助于就环境可持续性和社区复原力展开更广泛的辩论。今后的工作应将参与式方法扩展到各种情况,并强调社会生态的相互作用,以便进行有效的环境交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信