Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy during parenthood in British Columbia

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Alex Halonen, Heidi Sze Lok Fan, Stephanie Masina, Rishma Chooniedass, Elizabeth Keys, Marie Tarrant
{"title":"Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy during parenthood in British Columbia","authors":"Alex Halonen,&nbsp;Heidi Sze Lok Fan,&nbsp;Stephanie Masina,&nbsp;Rishma Chooniedass,&nbsp;Elizabeth Keys,&nbsp;Marie Tarrant","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>COVID-19 vaccine uptake was significantly lower in children under 12 when compared with adults. Vaccine hesitancy was a potential key contributor to the challenges faced in COVID-19 vaccine uptake</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted across British Columbia, Canada, from October to December 2021 to understand the COVID-19 vaccine perceptions of parents of children under 12 years of age. Participants completed a modified version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS). Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with parental vaccine hesitancy and to explore the relationship between parental vaccine intentions and vaccine hesitancy</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 993 parents participated in the study. One-half of parents (52.1 %) were vaccine hesitant for pediatric COVID-19 vaccines. For every additional child under 12 in a household, parents were more hesitant (adjusted odds ration [aOR] 1.69, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.28–2.24). Vaccinated parents (aOR 0.01, 95 % CI 0.004–0.02 vs. unvaccinated parents) and parents of children immunized for influenza (aOR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.12–0.29 vs. parents of children not immunized for influenzas) were less likely to be hesitant. Participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine recommendation from their healthcare provider were also less likely to be hesitant (aOR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.18–0.79). Vaccine hesitant parents were less likely to intend to vaccinate their child when compared with a parent who was not vaccine hesitant (aOR 0.001, 95 % CI 0.0004–0.005)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings from this study identify factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making, supporting the application of the VHS in clinical practice to allow for more strategic implementation of vaccine-promotion resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 127305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25006024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

COVID-19 vaccine uptake was significantly lower in children under 12 when compared with adults. Vaccine hesitancy was a potential key contributor to the challenges faced in COVID-19 vaccine uptake

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey was conducted across British Columbia, Canada, from October to December 2021 to understand the COVID-19 vaccine perceptions of parents of children under 12 years of age. Participants completed a modified version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS). Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with parental vaccine hesitancy and to explore the relationship between parental vaccine intentions and vaccine hesitancy

Results

A total of 993 parents participated in the study. One-half of parents (52.1 %) were vaccine hesitant for pediatric COVID-19 vaccines. For every additional child under 12 in a household, parents were more hesitant (adjusted odds ration [aOR] 1.69, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.28–2.24). Vaccinated parents (aOR 0.01, 95 % CI 0.004–0.02 vs. unvaccinated parents) and parents of children immunized for influenza (aOR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.12–0.29 vs. parents of children not immunized for influenzas) were less likely to be hesitant. Participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine recommendation from their healthcare provider were also less likely to be hesitant (aOR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.18–0.79). Vaccine hesitant parents were less likely to intend to vaccinate their child when compared with a parent who was not vaccine hesitant (aOR 0.001, 95 % CI 0.0004–0.005)

Conclusion

The findings from this study identify factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making, supporting the application of the VHS in clinical practice to allow for more strategic implementation of vaccine-promotion resources.
了解不列颠哥伦比亚省父母对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫
与成人相比,12岁以下儿童的covid -19疫苗接种率显着降低。疫苗犹豫是COVID-19疫苗接种面临挑战的潜在关键因素method于2021年10月至12月在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省进行了一项在线横断面调查,以了解12岁以下儿童父母对COVID-19疫苗的看法。参与者完成了修改版本的疫苗犹豫量表(VHS)。采用Logistic回归模型识别父母疫苗犹豫的相关因素,探讨父母疫苗接种意愿与疫苗犹豫的关系。结果共有993名父母参与了研究。一半的家长(52.1%)对儿童COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决。家庭中每增加一个12岁以下的孩子,父母就会更加犹豫(调整后的优势比[aOR] 1.69, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.28-2.24)。接种疫苗的父母(aOR为0.01,95% CI为0.004-0.02,未接种疫苗的父母)和接种流感疫苗儿童的父母(aOR为0.18,95% CI为0.12-0.29,未接种流感疫苗儿童的父母)不太可能犹豫不决。接受医疗保健提供者推荐的COVID-19疫苗的参与者也不太可能犹豫不决(aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.79)。与没有疫苗犹豫的父母相比,疫苗犹豫的父母更不愿意为孩子接种疫苗(aOR 0.001, 95% CI 0.0004-0.005)结论本研究的结果确定了影响COVID-19疫苗决策的因素,支持VHS在临床实践中的应用,以便更有战略地实施疫苗推广资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信