Wildland fire smoke exposure disparities by wildland urban interface category and land ownership

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jihoon Jung , Claire L. Schollaert , Yuta J. Masuda , Rachel E. Connolly , Eimy Bonilla , Kane Samuel , Daja Elum , Ryan D. Haugo , John T. Bandzuh , Bok Haeng Baek , Miriam E. Marlier , June T. Spector , Joseph L. Wilkins
{"title":"Wildland fire smoke exposure disparities by wildland urban interface category and land ownership","authors":"Jihoon Jung ,&nbsp;Claire L. Schollaert ,&nbsp;Yuta J. Masuda ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Connolly ,&nbsp;Eimy Bonilla ,&nbsp;Kane Samuel ,&nbsp;Daja Elum ,&nbsp;Ryan D. Haugo ,&nbsp;John T. Bandzuh ,&nbsp;Bok Haeng Baek ,&nbsp;Miriam E. Marlier ,&nbsp;June T. Spector ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Wilkins","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildland fire activity has increased across many regions of the United States, raising concerns about smoke exposure and the health impacts of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Former studies on environmental disparities show smoke impacts vary across communities and regions, but most studies focus on non-spatial factors (e.g., income, race/ethnicity), potentially overlooking the spatial dimension of smoke exposure disparities. We advance this literature by assessing a location’s resilience with spatial aspects of wildland fire smoke exposure for two spatial variables: wildland urban interface (WUI) category and land ownership. We have four research objectives: 1) to identify areas with higher exposure to wildland fire PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 2) to identify areas with greater demographic or socioeconomic vulnerability, 3) to calculate increases in unhealthy air quality days, and 4) to measure the size of the population with high smoke exposure and high vulnerability. We found Native American reservations experience 0.15–0.32 μg/m<sup>3</sup> higher average daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> from wildland fire smoke, along with lower adaptive capacity, higher sensitivity, and higher vulnerability than other land ownership areas. WUI areas also showed at least 60 % higher increase in moderate air quality days (12–35 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and greater sensitivity than non-WUI areas. Most importantly, higher vulnerability areas, defined by the lowest adaptive capacity (≥95th percentile), highest sensitivity (≥95th percentile), and highest overall vulnerability (≥95th percentile), had a higher increase in the number of moderate (12–35 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and unhealthy air quality days (&gt;35 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) compared to their counterparts. These findings provide insights for community-led decision-making, resource allocation, fire management strategies, and public health interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105423"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildland fire activity has increased across many regions of the United States, raising concerns about smoke exposure and the health impacts of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Former studies on environmental disparities show smoke impacts vary across communities and regions, but most studies focus on non-spatial factors (e.g., income, race/ethnicity), potentially overlooking the spatial dimension of smoke exposure disparities. We advance this literature by assessing a location’s resilience with spatial aspects of wildland fire smoke exposure for two spatial variables: wildland urban interface (WUI) category and land ownership. We have four research objectives: 1) to identify areas with higher exposure to wildland fire PM2.5, 2) to identify areas with greater demographic or socioeconomic vulnerability, 3) to calculate increases in unhealthy air quality days, and 4) to measure the size of the population with high smoke exposure and high vulnerability. We found Native American reservations experience 0.15–0.32 μg/m3 higher average daily PM2.5 from wildland fire smoke, along with lower adaptive capacity, higher sensitivity, and higher vulnerability than other land ownership areas. WUI areas also showed at least 60 % higher increase in moderate air quality days (12–35 µg/m3) and greater sensitivity than non-WUI areas. Most importantly, higher vulnerability areas, defined by the lowest adaptive capacity (≥95th percentile), highest sensitivity (≥95th percentile), and highest overall vulnerability (≥95th percentile), had a higher increase in the number of moderate (12–35 µg/m3) and unhealthy air quality days (>35 µg/m3) compared to their counterparts. These findings provide insights for community-led decision-making, resource allocation, fire management strategies, and public health interventions.
荒地城市界面类型和土地所有权的野火烟雾暴露差异
美国许多地区的野火活动有所增加,引发了人们对烟雾暴露和细颗粒物(PM2.5)对健康影响的担忧。以往关于环境差异的研究表明,烟雾影响因社区和地区而异,但大多数研究关注非空间因素(如收入、种族/民族),可能忽视了烟雾暴露差异的空间维度。我们通过对两个空间变量(荒地城市界面(WUI)类别和土地所有权)的野火烟雾暴露的空间方面评估一个地点的弹性来推进这一文献。我们有四个研究目标:1)确定野火PM2.5暴露程度较高的地区,2)确定人口或社会经济脆弱性较大的地区,3)计算不健康空气质量天数的增加,4)测量高烟雾暴露和高脆弱性人口的规模。我们发现,与其他土地所有权地区相比,美国原住民保留区野火烟雾的平均每日PM2.5水平高出0.15-0.32 μg/m3,同时适应能力较低,敏感性较高,脆弱性较高。与非WUI地区相比,WUI地区中等空气质量天数(12-35µg/m3)的增幅至少高出60%,敏感性也更高。最重要的是,由最低适应能力(≥95百分位数)、最高敏感性(≥95百分位数)和最高总体脆弱性(≥95百分位数)定义的高脆弱性地区,与其他地区相比,中等(12-35µg/m3)和不健康空气质量日数(>35µg/m3)的增加幅度更高。这些发现为社区主导的决策、资源分配、火灾管理策略和公共卫生干预提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信