Perceived Social Norms and Vaccine Hesitancy

IF 7.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Robert C. Dempsey, Alex M. Wood
{"title":"Perceived Social Norms and Vaccine Hesitancy","authors":"Robert C. Dempsey, Alex M. Wood","doi":"10.1177/09637214251340023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccines are an important tool for preventing serious illness and avoiding deaths. Vaccine hesitancy, the delay or refusal of vaccines when available or offered, is one of the top 10 threats to global public health. The acceptance and uptake, delay, or refusal of vaccines has direct health implications for individuals, their close contacts, and indirectly for others in their environment and wider social networks. Vaccination uptake/hesitancy is the product of human decision-making and is influenced by various psychological and social factors, including perceived social norms. Individuals will often consider others’ vaccine-related attitudes and/or behaviors to guide their own decision-making. One potential way of reducing vaccine hesitancy is by changing people’s (mis)perceptions of these vaccine-related social norms through feedback interventions that highlight the actual vaccination norms (e.g., that most others would take a vaccine if offered). This article takes a social norms perspective toward understanding vaccine hesitancy, discusses how and why perceived social norms may be influential in hesitancy, and outlines ways psychological science can better understand the perceived social norms implicated in vaccine hesitancy.","PeriodicalId":10802,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251340023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccines are an important tool for preventing serious illness and avoiding deaths. Vaccine hesitancy, the delay or refusal of vaccines when available or offered, is one of the top 10 threats to global public health. The acceptance and uptake, delay, or refusal of vaccines has direct health implications for individuals, their close contacts, and indirectly for others in their environment and wider social networks. Vaccination uptake/hesitancy is the product of human decision-making and is influenced by various psychological and social factors, including perceived social norms. Individuals will often consider others’ vaccine-related attitudes and/or behaviors to guide their own decision-making. One potential way of reducing vaccine hesitancy is by changing people’s (mis)perceptions of these vaccine-related social norms through feedback interventions that highlight the actual vaccination norms (e.g., that most others would take a vaccine if offered). This article takes a social norms perspective toward understanding vaccine hesitancy, discusses how and why perceived social norms may be influential in hesitancy, and outlines ways psychological science can better understand the perceived social norms implicated in vaccine hesitancy.
感知社会规范和疫苗犹豫
疫苗是预防严重疾病和避免死亡的重要工具。疫苗犹豫,即在可获得或提供疫苗时延迟或拒绝接种,是全球公共卫生面临的十大威胁之一。接受和接受、延迟或拒绝接种疫苗对个人及其密切接触者具有直接的健康影响,并间接影响其环境和更广泛的社会网络中的其他人。接种疫苗的接受/犹豫是人类决策的产物,并受到各种心理和社会因素的影响,包括感知到的社会规范。个人通常会考虑他人与疫苗有关的态度和/或行为来指导自己的决策。减少疫苗犹豫的一种潜在方法是,通过强调实际疫苗接种规范的反馈干预措施(例如,如果提供疫苗,大多数人会接种疫苗),改变人们对这些与疫苗相关的社会规范的(错误)看法。本文从社会规范的角度来理解疫苗犹豫,讨论了感知到的社会规范如何以及为什么会影响到犹豫,并概述了心理科学可以更好地理解与疫苗犹豫有关的感知到的社会规范的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Current Directions in Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Current Directions in Psychological Science publishes reviews by leading experts covering all of scientific psychology and its applications. Each issue of Current Directions features a diverse mix of reports on various topics such as language, memory and cognition, development, the neural basis of behavior and emotions, various aspects of psychopathology, and theory of mind. These articles allow readers to stay apprised of important developments across subfields beyond their areas of expertise and bodies of research they might not otherwise be aware of. The articles in Current Directions are also written to be accessible to non-experts, making them ideally suited for use in the classroom as teaching supplements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信