Marko Kohtamäki, Rodrigo Rabetino, Vinit Parida, Paavo Ritala
{"title":"Strategy in the digitalization era","authors":"Marko Kohtamäki, Rodrigo Rabetino, Vinit Parida, Paavo Ritala","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ever since the rise of the Internet, digitalization has been increasingly shaping firms’ business processes and models. The rapid rise of digital technologies has perhaps even changed some of the fundamentals of strategy, including strategic decision-making, cognition, discourse and practices. However, limited effort has been made to structure the strategy-oriented academic discourse in the digitalization era. This essay begins by defining and positioning the digital transformation from a strategic perspective. We provide grounds for this essay based on the existing research on a literature search and review to add theoretical structure to the field through the bibliometric mapping of 626 digital transformation studies from high-quality academic journals (AJG3 and AJG4 journal quality levels). Based on the analysis, we identify four clusters of research perspectives: (1) digital transformation, (2) digital strategy, (3) digital business model innovation and (4) digital marketing. Our essay contributes to the emerging digital transformation literature by positioning these different perspectives in digital phenomena that are relevant and adjacent to strategy and strategizing. Finally, we position the special issue papers in the research perspectives identified, and we suggest potential avenues for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"27 3","pages":"309-323"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ever since the rise of the Internet, digitalization has been increasingly shaping firms’ business processes and models. The rapid rise of digital technologies has perhaps even changed some of the fundamentals of strategy, including strategic decision-making, cognition, discourse and practices. However, limited effort has been made to structure the strategy-oriented academic discourse in the digitalization era. This essay begins by defining and positioning the digital transformation from a strategic perspective. We provide grounds for this essay based on the existing research on a literature search and review to add theoretical structure to the field through the bibliometric mapping of 626 digital transformation studies from high-quality academic journals (AJG3 and AJG4 journal quality levels). Based on the analysis, we identify four clusters of research perspectives: (1) digital transformation, (2) digital strategy, (3) digital business model innovation and (4) digital marketing. Our essay contributes to the emerging digital transformation literature by positioning these different perspectives in digital phenomena that are relevant and adjacent to strategy and strategizing. Finally, we position the special issue papers in the research perspectives identified, and we suggest potential avenues for future research.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.