Trial-By-Trial Variation In Upper Extremity Movement Smoothness After Acute Stroke Relates To Clinical Assessments And Corticospinal Tract Injury.

IF 3.7
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-31 DOI:10.1177/15459683251340916
Sarah K Cavanagh, Perman Gochyyev, Rashida Nayeem, Aliceson N Dusang, Taya Hamilton, Julie A DiCarlo, Steven A Kautz, Dagmar Sternad, Conor Walsh, Leigh Hochberg, David J Lin
{"title":"Trial-By-Trial Variation In Upper Extremity Movement Smoothness After Acute Stroke Relates To Clinical Assessments And Corticospinal Tract Injury.","authors":"Sarah K Cavanagh, Perman Gochyyev, Rashida Nayeem, Aliceson N Dusang, Taya Hamilton, Julie A DiCarlo, Steven A Kautz, Dagmar Sternad, Conor Walsh, Leigh Hochberg, David J Lin","doi":"10.1177/15459683251340916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundVariability in movement is critical for performance under dynamic conditions. Stroke causes focal injury to the motor system, disrupts voluntary motor control, and leads to less smooth and more variable upper extremity movements. Few studies have characterized trial-by-trial variation in upper extremity movement smoothness and its clinical and neuroanatomic correlates in the first week post-stroke.ObjectiveTo evaluate trial-by-trial variation in upper extremity movement smoothness during planar reaching and relate it to clinical outcomes and neuroanatomical injury after acute stroke.MethodsTwenty-two patients (4.4 ± 1.7 days post-stroke) and 22 able-bodied adults completed a planar center-out reaching task. Smoothness was quantified with spectral arc length (SPARC). Median and interquartile range (IQR, a quantification of trial-by-trial variation) of SPARC values were assessed. Patients completed a clinical assessment battery acutely and at 90 days post-stroke. MRI-derived stroke lesions were analyzed to estimate basal ganglia, motor cortex, and corticospinal tract injury. Intraclass correlation, Spearman's correlation, and multivariate regression evaluated trial-by-trial variation and its relation to clinical assessments, outcomes, and neuroanatomical injury.ResultsPost-stroke reaching was less smooth and more variable (larger IQR) compared to able-bodied adults. Variability in post-stroke smoothness was primarily driven by within-subject, trial-by-trial variation. More variable smoothness, even after controlling for median smoothness, related to worse performance on clinical assessments and 90-day outcomes. More variable smoothness related to greater corticospinal tract injury (ρ = 0.537, <i>P</i> = .011), but not to basal ganglia or motor cortex injury.ConclusionTrial-by-trial variation of movement is valuable for understanding sensorimotor control post-stroke and has implications for targeted neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"639-652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251340916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundVariability in movement is critical for performance under dynamic conditions. Stroke causes focal injury to the motor system, disrupts voluntary motor control, and leads to less smooth and more variable upper extremity movements. Few studies have characterized trial-by-trial variation in upper extremity movement smoothness and its clinical and neuroanatomic correlates in the first week post-stroke.ObjectiveTo evaluate trial-by-trial variation in upper extremity movement smoothness during planar reaching and relate it to clinical outcomes and neuroanatomical injury after acute stroke.MethodsTwenty-two patients (4.4 ± 1.7 days post-stroke) and 22 able-bodied adults completed a planar center-out reaching task. Smoothness was quantified with spectral arc length (SPARC). Median and interquartile range (IQR, a quantification of trial-by-trial variation) of SPARC values were assessed. Patients completed a clinical assessment battery acutely and at 90 days post-stroke. MRI-derived stroke lesions were analyzed to estimate basal ganglia, motor cortex, and corticospinal tract injury. Intraclass correlation, Spearman's correlation, and multivariate regression evaluated trial-by-trial variation and its relation to clinical assessments, outcomes, and neuroanatomical injury.ResultsPost-stroke reaching was less smooth and more variable (larger IQR) compared to able-bodied adults. Variability in post-stroke smoothness was primarily driven by within-subject, trial-by-trial variation. More variable smoothness, even after controlling for median smoothness, related to worse performance on clinical assessments and 90-day outcomes. More variable smoothness related to greater corticospinal tract injury (ρ = 0.537, P = .011), but not to basal ganglia or motor cortex injury.ConclusionTrial-by-trial variation of movement is valuable for understanding sensorimotor control post-stroke and has implications for targeted neurorehabilitation.

急性脑卒中后上肢运动平稳性的试验差异与临床评估和皮质脊髓束损伤有关。
运动的可变性对动态条件下的表现至关重要。中风引起运动系统的局灶性损伤,扰乱自主运动控制,导致上肢运动不顺畅和更多变。很少有研究描述中风后第一周上肢运动平稳性及其临床和神经解剖学相关性的试验间变化。目的评价急性脑卒中后上肢平面伸展运动平稳性随试验的变化,并将其与临床预后和神经解剖损伤联系起来。方法22例患者(脑卒中后4.4±1.7 d)和22例健全成人完成平面中心向外伸手任务。光滑度用光谱弧长(SPARC)量化。评估了SPARC值的中位数和四分位数范围(IQR,一种逐试验变化的量化)。患者在中风后急性期和90天完成了临床评估。对mri衍生的脑卒中病变进行分析,以评估基底节区、运动皮层和皮质脊髓束损伤。类内相关、Spearman相关和多变量回归评估了每项试验的变异及其与临床评估、结果和神经解剖损伤的关系。结果与身体健全的成年人相比,脑卒中后到达不太顺畅,更可变(IQR更大)。卒中后平滑度的可变性主要是由受试者内部、试验间的变化所驱动的。即使在控制了中位平滑度之后,更多的变量平滑度与临床评估和90天预后的较差表现有关。更多的变量平滑度与皮质脊髓束损伤程度有关(ρ = 0.537, P = 0.011),但与基底节区或运动皮质损伤无关。结论每次试验的运动变化对理解脑卒中后感觉运动控制有价值,并对有针对性的神经康复有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信