Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU-Reward Task.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ha Jeong Park, Annmarie MacNamara
{"title":"Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU-Reward Task.","authors":"Ha Jeong Park, Annmarie MacNamara","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

等待它:npu -奖励任务中对比回避的防御反应和个体差异。
防御反应(惊吓)在预期暂时不可预测(>可预测)威胁时增加。在预期奖励的过程中,惊吓似乎也被增强了,但这是如何受到时间不可预测性的影响的,此前还没有研究过。除了不可预测性之外,受试者之间在如何准备和试图调节他们对动机显著事件的反应方面的差异可能会影响对奖励的防御性反应。具体来说,对比回避是一种自我报告的避免情绪变化的倾向,虽然通常研究与消极事件有关,但理论上它适用于积极事件,这可以为情绪的更大的向下转移奠定基础。本研究采用无(N)奖励、可预测(P)奖励和不可预测(U)奖励任务的新范式,考察了时间不可预测性和个体差异在对比回避中对惊视眨眼和脑电成分、奖励积极性(RewP)在预期和接受奖励反馈中的影响。65名参与者在EEG和EMG数据收集过程中完成了NPU-reward任务,并完成了对比回避问卷(担忧版)。惊吓眨眼仅在P和N奖励提示时增强(即,不是U和N)。相比之下,P和U奖励反馈的RewP都比N奖励反馈大。此外,相比于U奖励间刺激间隔,在P奖励间刺激间隔中,具有更大对比度回避的个体有更大的惊吓眨眼。因此,奖励传递的时间可能对调节预期性防御反射很重要,而对比回避可能会干扰奖励反馈后防御反应的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信