{"title":"Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU-Reward Task.","authors":"Ha Jeong Park, Annmarie MacNamara","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.