Understanding Cancer Care for Nursing Home Residents Living With Dementia: An Ethnographic Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Olivia Claire Robinson, Claire Surr, Laura Ashley
{"title":"Understanding Cancer Care for Nursing Home Residents Living With Dementia: An Ethnographic Study.","authors":"Olivia Claire Robinson, Claire Surr, Laura Ashley","doi":"10.1002/pon.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the United Kingdom (UK), 1 in 13 people living with dementia also have cancer. At some point, 41.3% of this population group will require care home support. Limited research has examined the care and support needs of people with dementia and comorbid cancer (DCC) in nursing homes (NHs). This study aimed to explore the care experiences of NH residents with DCC, their families, nursing home staff (NHS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to identify challenges and good practices, to develop recommendations for practice improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focussed ethnography using interviews, observations, informal conversations, and review of care plan documentation. Data were analysed using ethnographically informed reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight HCPs, Six NHS, 5 family caregivers and 7 residents with DCC were recruited from five NHs in Northern England. Two themes were developed: Complexities around cancer referral and treatment decision-making and Relative invisibility of a resident's clinical cancer diagnosis. Findings suggested residents with DCC were not included in best interest decision-making due to the potential distress knowing about a cancer diagnosis would cause. Families, HCPs and NH staff made collective decisions on the behalf of residents. Often cancer referral was deemed not appropriate. Thus, people with dementia had a clinical-only cancer diagnosis, resulting in limited formal information about the cancer in care documentation and staff knowledge. Potential consequences of having a clinical-only cancer diagnosis included: misattributing cancer symptoms to dementia, reactive care responses to cancer symptoms and the possibility of inadequately managed cancer symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing earlier discussions about feasible care outcomes is crucial. These conversations should include considerations around hospital referral for oncology care or care through palliation in the NH. Without appropriate recognition of a clinical-only cancer diagnosis and support for staff it could lead to advancement of symptoms that might be challenging and less well managed. We outline several recommendations to support NHS to deliver person-centred care to residents with DCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 6","pages":"e70184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the United Kingdom (UK), 1 in 13 people living with dementia also have cancer. At some point, 41.3% of this population group will require care home support. Limited research has examined the care and support needs of people with dementia and comorbid cancer (DCC) in nursing homes (NHs). This study aimed to explore the care experiences of NH residents with DCC, their families, nursing home staff (NHS) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to identify challenges and good practices, to develop recommendations for practice improvement.

Methods: A focussed ethnography using interviews, observations, informal conversations, and review of care plan documentation. Data were analysed using ethnographically informed reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Eight HCPs, Six NHS, 5 family caregivers and 7 residents with DCC were recruited from five NHs in Northern England. Two themes were developed: Complexities around cancer referral and treatment decision-making and Relative invisibility of a resident's clinical cancer diagnosis. Findings suggested residents with DCC were not included in best interest decision-making due to the potential distress knowing about a cancer diagnosis would cause. Families, HCPs and NH staff made collective decisions on the behalf of residents. Often cancer referral was deemed not appropriate. Thus, people with dementia had a clinical-only cancer diagnosis, resulting in limited formal information about the cancer in care documentation and staff knowledge. Potential consequences of having a clinical-only cancer diagnosis included: misattributing cancer symptoms to dementia, reactive care responses to cancer symptoms and the possibility of inadequately managed cancer symptoms.

Conclusions: Implementing earlier discussions about feasible care outcomes is crucial. These conversations should include considerations around hospital referral for oncology care or care through palliation in the NH. Without appropriate recognition of a clinical-only cancer diagnosis and support for staff it could lead to advancement of symptoms that might be challenging and less well managed. We outline several recommendations to support NHS to deliver person-centred care to residents with DCC.

了解老年痴呆症养老院居民的癌症护理:一项民族志研究。
目的:在英国,每13名痴呆症患者中就有1人同时患有癌症。在某种程度上,41.3%的这一人群将需要养老院的支持。有限的研究检查了养老院(NHs)中痴呆症和共病癌症(DCC)患者的护理和支持需求。本研究旨在探讨患有DCC的NH居民,他们的家人,养老院工作人员(NHS)和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的护理经验,并确定挑战和良好的做法,制定实践改进建议。方法:采用访谈、观察、非正式谈话和回顾护理计划文件的方法进行集中的人种志研究。数据分析使用民族志信息的反身性主题分析。结果:从英格兰北部的5个NHS中招募了8名HCPs, 6名NHS, 5名家庭护理人员和7名患有DCC的居民。两个主题:围绕癌症转诊和治疗决策的复杂性和住院医生临床癌症诊断的相对不可见性。研究结果表明,由于了解癌症诊断可能导致的潜在痛苦,患有DCC的居民没有被纳入最佳利益决策。家庭、卫生保健服务提供者和国家卫生院工作人员代表居民作出集体决定。通常癌症转诊被认为是不合适的。因此,患有痴呆症的人只有临床癌症诊断,导致在护理文件和工作人员知识中关于癌症的正式信息有限。仅进行临床癌症诊断的潜在后果包括:将癌症症状错误地归因于痴呆,对癌症症状的反应性护理反应以及癌症症状管理不当的可能性。结论:实施早期讨论可行的护理结果是至关重要的。这些对话应包括考虑到医院转诊肿瘤护理或护理通过姑息治疗在NH。如果没有对临床癌症诊断的适当认识和对工作人员的支持,就可能导致可能具有挑战性和管理不善的症状的进展。我们概述了一些建议,以支持国民保健服务提供以人为本的护理居民与DCC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信