Freedom of Choice in the United States: Patient Autonomy Is Driving Decision-Making in Bariatric Surgery.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Peter Habib, Christen Chaconas, Vadim Lyuksemburg, Marc Sarran, Francisco Quinteros, Rami Lutfi
{"title":"Freedom of Choice in the United States: Patient Autonomy Is Driving Decision-Making in Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Peter Habib, Christen Chaconas, Vadim Lyuksemburg, Marc Sarran, Francisco Quinteros, Rami Lutfi","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07918-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity affects over 650 million adults worldwide, with bariatric surgery being the most effective long-term treatment. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly performed procedures in the USA. Increased access to online information allows patients to self-educate, often leading to predetermined surgical choices. This study evaluates how self-education influences decision-making and whether specialist consultation alters patient preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study (May 2021-May 2022) included adults eligible for SG or RYGB. Patients completed surveys on surgical preferences and educational sources before receiving standardized consultations. Those with diabetes were presented with an evidence-based diabetes remission calculator (Cleveland Clinic, Individualized Metabolic Surgery Score). Final surgical choices were analyzed before and after consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 429 patients, 74.1% had a predetermined surgical choice, with 81.4% preferring SG. Internet searches influenced 67%, and 51% self-referred via online research. Despite evidence-based recommendations, only 34% of diabetic patients changed their predetermined choice after consulting a specialist. Many remained committed to their preference despite objective data suggesting a more optimal option.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient self-education, often based on non-evidence-based sources, significantly influences surgical decision-making, sometimes contradicting medical recommendations. This presents a challenge for healthcare providers striving to balance patient autonomy with evidence-based care. More patients are arriving with predetermined surgical choices, effective strategies are needed to navigate these dynamics, enhance patient understanding, and optimize both surgical outcomes and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07918-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity affects over 650 million adults worldwide, with bariatric surgery being the most effective long-term treatment. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly performed procedures in the USA. Increased access to online information allows patients to self-educate, often leading to predetermined surgical choices. This study evaluates how self-education influences decision-making and whether specialist consultation alters patient preferences.

Methods: A prospective cohort study (May 2021-May 2022) included adults eligible for SG or RYGB. Patients completed surveys on surgical preferences and educational sources before receiving standardized consultations. Those with diabetes were presented with an evidence-based diabetes remission calculator (Cleveland Clinic, Individualized Metabolic Surgery Score). Final surgical choices were analyzed before and after consultation.

Results: Among 429 patients, 74.1% had a predetermined surgical choice, with 81.4% preferring SG. Internet searches influenced 67%, and 51% self-referred via online research. Despite evidence-based recommendations, only 34% of diabetic patients changed their predetermined choice after consulting a specialist. Many remained committed to their preference despite objective data suggesting a more optimal option.

Conclusions: Patient self-education, often based on non-evidence-based sources, significantly influences surgical decision-making, sometimes contradicting medical recommendations. This presents a challenge for healthcare providers striving to balance patient autonomy with evidence-based care. More patients are arriving with predetermined surgical choices, effective strategies are needed to navigate these dynamics, enhance patient understanding, and optimize both surgical outcomes and satisfaction.

美国的选择自由:患者自主正在推动减肥手术的决策。
背景:全世界有超过6.5亿成年人患有肥胖症,减肥手术是最有效的长期治疗方法。套筒胃切除术(SG)和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)是美国最常见的手术。越来越多的在线信息使患者能够自我教育,往往导致预先确定的手术选择。本研究评估自我教育如何影响决策,以及专家咨询是否会改变患者的偏好。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究(2021年5月- 2022年5月)纳入了符合SG或RYGB条件的成年人。患者在接受标准化会诊前完成手术偏好和教育来源的调查。糖尿病患者使用基于证据的糖尿病缓解计算器(克利夫兰诊所,个体化代谢手术评分)。会诊前后分析最终的手术选择。结果:在429例患者中,74.1%的患者有预先确定的手术选择,81.4%的患者选择SG。67%的人受网络搜索的影响,51%的人通过网络搜索自我提及。尽管有循证建议,但只有34%的糖尿病患者在咨询专家后改变了他们的预定选择。尽管客观数据显示有更优的选择,但许多人仍然坚持自己的偏好。结论:患者自我教育往往基于非循证来源,显著影响手术决策,有时与医学建议相矛盾。这对努力平衡患者自主权和循证护理的医疗保健提供者提出了挑战。越来越多的患者到达时都有预先确定的手术选择,需要有效的策略来驾驭这些动态,增强患者的理解,并优化手术结果和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信